Terry is going to be special, small but a great athlete and just controls the game.
Your team’s starting 5?
- Thread starter Big_C_KU
- Start date
I hear nothing but good things. I really look forward to seeing him play.
So y’all English professors have never said that’s the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard/seen. Get over urself it’s an online message board not a edited publication. Knocking people grammar is what ppl do once they’ve lost the argument.
Urself? Yikes. It’s like texting when I was 13.
I had no argument in this. It’s just very funny to me when someone can’t even type coherently yet they make fun of another’s intelligence. Carry on.
Then look in the mirror bc u lost over and over in this thread. From ur inability to tell what is and isn’t a fact to your idiotic view of what the word vacated means. But by all means, morph into the grammar police, something u stand a chance at winning.
Then look in the mirror bc u lost over and over in this thread. From ur inability to tell what is and isn’t a fact to your idiotic view of what the word vacated means. But by all means, morph into the grammar police, something u stand a chance at winning.
^^^ Wow, you really suck at this. You have been the epitome of "loser" throughout this thread. You should do something else with your time rather than get into a battle of wits as unarmed as you are.
What's gone is gone. Nothing false about that. 2013 title no longer counts.... for anyone. Nothing false about that either. I know facts are foreign to you U6ers..... call them what you will. I'll just keep laughing at you.
Wrong again. Geeze this concept isn’t that hard. 2013 title doesn’t count TO THE NCAA not to any one. It counts for me, I watched it. It counts for the players who still have their championship rings. It literally counts to everyone except the ncaa, and ncaa bitch boys like you who actually defend their crooked operation. Carry on as long as ud like, ill come back if u ever figure out what vacate means.
Lol at cracking jokes about facts while arguing that vacating a game means the game never happened.
Lol at cracking jokes about facts while arguing that vacating a game means the game never happened.
Ironic that Louisville fans are calling the NCAA crooked
When a T-shirt and memory is all you have, your "title" becomes nothing more than folklore, but you do you, buddy.
Along with every other fan base when they let UNC slide. The NCAA has been crooked far before they hammered us.
Hell the fact that izzo is still employed after covering up a rape and tampering with the victim tells me all I need to know about how great the ncaa is. And that’s not even mentioning Nasar, while not basketball related, still NCAA related.
So yea I’d rather be a fan of a team whose players get free stripper parties than one whose Head Coach covers up rapes by his players.
Sorry bud but it will be in the history books FOREVER, we will just have a little * next to it. If the NCAA wasn’t corrupt we wouldn’t be the only ones with an asterisk though.
Which rape did Izzo cover up? Enlighten me. Tom Izzo has never covered up a rape. If I somehow missed out it though you should tell me.
Also, the witness was his godson, but of course ESPN isn’t going to put that in the headline. He asked his god son what happened.
So you’ve never heard that Payne admitted to raping a girl on tape? Him and appling I believe but appling didn’t admit to it on tape I don’t think. And the fact they were never arrested/prosecuted = coverup.
Maybe google it, hard to believe a sparty fan doesn’t remember that.
Maybe google it, hard to believe a sparty fan doesn’t remember that.
She didn’t actually file charges, so there was no criminal investigation at all. If she filed charges it would have been a different story.
How does that mean Izzo covered up rape? Your logic and reasoning are out there.
Yeah, it’s not a great look, but the headline is worse than what happened. It makes it seem like he sought out witnesses of our walk on grabbing a girls butt, which was the sexual assault, but in reality he was asking his god son what happened. I don’t think that’s that unreasonable, asking what happened with one of your players when a family member is there.
BC when his players admitted to him they raped a girl he should have called the police. She wasn’t pressing charges bc of the rich tradition of rape on MSU campus. If she had been a regular woman raped by two non-athlete/local celebrities I have a feeling things would have played out quite differently, and appling and Payne would still be locked up.
Yea headline is def misleading as far as what happened. Headline makes it seem like he was shaking down witnesses.
Payne said he could have saw how she felt that way, she started out having a 3 way with them, when she wanted to stop Payne stopped but Appling wanted to finish. She actually needed to file charges against them in this situation, which she didn’t, so this thing never went anywhere.
Keith Appling is in jail right now for various drug charges. He’s a really shitty human being. It wouldn’t surprise me one but if this was true. Unfortunately, you can’t assume it’s true without a trial. That’s punishment for something that was never proven true.
The argument from most people knowledgeable about the situation is that Izzo at least should have somewhat punished them, even though it wasn’t a criminal investigation, it was something you shouldn’t do as a player and they should have been suspended a game or so, which he didn’t. I think that argument is totally fair, but I don’t know how you can say he covered it up from that. There’s 0 evidence of that, just a lot of rival fan bases wanting it to be true.
I'm thinking Brooks at PG, Zeb Jackson at shooting guard. Dickerson starts. As much as I like Davis, he is a backup.
Don’t forget, Michigan still has the Big Tens # 1 ranked recruit class.
I don’t see Zeb Jackson starting day one at Michigan. He isn’t going to go from a backup guard player on his high school team to a Big Ten starter.
Kentucky:
Mintz
Boston
Clarke
Brooks
Jackson
Bench: Askew, Ware, Allen, Toppin, Fletcher
Pretty typical last 5 years Kentucky roster. Ultra talented, ultra young, missing the experience and a piece here or there to present a real threat when it matters. Anywhere between a 2-8 seed(the sec is going to be good next year), E8 ceiling.
Mintz
Boston
Clarke
Brooks
Jackson
Bench: Askew, Ware, Allen, Toppin, Fletcher
Pretty typical last 5 years Kentucky roster. Ultra talented, ultra young, missing the experience and a piece here or there to present a real threat when it matters. Anywhere between a 2-8 seed(the sec is going to be good next year), E8 ceiling.
Last edited:
Cade Cunningham is probably harder to beat out than Mike Smith or Cole Bajema. He’ll probably be top 10-15 on most lists of “best players of 2020/21”. Not that I’m predicting anything for Jackson, but he was sitting behind the best high school player in the country for arguably the best team in prep history (not hyperbole).
I would value his AAU play more than his play in high school..
From what I have seen and read Jackson is the best player out of that class right now for Michigan
Does he start next year at Michigan who knows.
I do think he will show something during the season and can end up getting a lot of playing time.
From what I have seen and read Jackson is the best player out of that class right now for Michigan
Does he start next year at Michigan who knows.
I do think he will show something during the season and can end up getting a lot of playing time.
Yeah, it’s not like he came off the bench for his local public school. Montverde was as loaded as any HS team I’ve ever seen. Along with Jackson that team had....
2020:
PG Cunningham #1
PF Barnes #7
C Sharpe #12
SF Moody #54
2021:
SG Love #39
PG Nembhard #75
You have Ware twice and left off Fletcher. Missing out on Haarms, they are going to be extremely thin in the front court, especially at "5". Foul trouble will be a major issue. At this point I don't see them adding anyone else of value to the roster, unless the immediate eligibility transfer waiver is put in place for 20-21.
With Haarms I loved the roster. Without him? Yikes. Going into the ultra physical sec with skinny freshman and one returning player inside is gonna be ugly.
Eh, Cal will configure the lineup in a way to make you guys good. He still has talent. Not having the horses down low will hurt your ceiling for sure but you can still win with talented guards.
Well apparently the immediate eligibility transfer rule is supposed to pass for the 20-21 season, so I hope Cal poaches a couple studs from other teams.
Well apparently the immediate eligibility transfer rule is supposed to pass for the 20-21 season, so I hope Cal poaches a couple studs from other teams.
I don't think you guys will suck like we did this past year, I mean I hope you will but Cal will figure it out but BBN may be on suicide watch till that happens.
Similar threads
