UVA Declines White House Invitation
- Thread starter Hank_
- Start date
- Status
Dat, you have a long standing MO here. You minimslize actions of others who you agree with, but exaggerate things you disagree. You are in rare form today for some reason.
You never speak of Farrakan and his antisemitic speeches or his good friend Obama who worships him. Weird huh?
You never speak of Farrakan and his antisemitic speeches or his good friend Obama who worships him. Weird huh?
Just trolling and hoping I'll bring up how "spade" has one connotation as a racial slur.
No I called that liberal a islamaphobe because he talked bad about it
I've never spoken of Farrakhan b/c he is irrelevant. Here: I condemn his alleged antisemitism. President Obama does not worship him, and has no suspicion of antisemitism associated with him.
It is not minimizing to give accurate context that exposes your examples as insufficient. If you're going to claim I have some "long standing MO" that just happens to be an exact duplicate of a longstanding wholesale disagreement with you, you have no room to talk about an MO and you're a hypocrite to try. How about you try to rebut my actual words instead of chickening out there in favor of coming at me personally?
Religion has nothing to do with a moral compass. I encompassed 300 yrs because for some reason you did 250..... Religion doesn't piss me off, its the idiots following it....
Because all religions endorsed slavery, it was ok? Why isn't it ok now then.... It sure as hell wasn't religion that freed the slaves in the US.
Lol. Alleged antisemitism. Why can’t you just call it antisemitism? There is no alleged.
Obama had a relationship with Farrakan and only when he officially announced running for office did he denounce him.
“Since the press hasn’t covered the fact that members of the Congressional Black Caucus in 2005 met with anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan, I’ll make coverage easier. Here are 21 members of Congress today who belonged to the CBC in 2005. Why not ask them if meeting with anti-Semites is ok?”
“Since the press hasn’t covered the fact that members of the Congressional Black Caucus in 2005 met with anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan, I’ll make coverage easier. Here are 21 members of Congress today who belonged to the CBC in 2005. Why not ask them if meeting with anti-Semites is ok?”
We have an elected official who spouts off antisemitic rhetoric regularly. Is she not relevant?
OMG.......typical Dat using "alleged". I wonder if he uses "alleged" KKK leader David Duke's Lmao
That does it for me! Stupidity at its finest, well, alleged" stupidity ..
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I am continuing to monitor the censorship of AMERICAN CITIZENS on social media platforms. This is the United States of America — and we have what’s known as FREEDOM OF SPEECH! We are monitoring and watching, closely!!</p>— Donald J. Trump (@RealDonaldTrump) <a href="">May 3, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Yeah Trump, the republican party needs more turds like these.
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Yeah Trump, the republican party needs more turds like these.
B/c I don't know the specific statements he is referring to, and I suspect they may be "antisemitic" in the same way Rep Omar has been accused of the same (ie, a Muslim can't have anything critical to say about anything even loosely related to Israel w/o Islamophobes freaking out and clutching their pearls).
So it is okay to be antisemitic if you are Muslim. With this logic it would be okay to be anti Muslim if you are Christian, I mean Easter worshiper.
I’m sure they do.....But who cares
let’s not act like you don’t know exactly what you’re doing when using specific terminology. You conducting yourself like this is the same way trump does. Refuses to directly acknowledge issues to rustle feathers when it literally would benefit all just to speak in clear concise terms. Won’t back your style on this one bc I find it intolerable either way. But it seems to be a case of a habitual offender crying wolf when his own style is used against him. There is a lesson to be learned here.
It is a verifiable fact that David Duke is a former Grand Wizard of the KKK and remains a white nationalist to this day.
How about the late Senator Robert Byrd? Do you acknowledge the former part of his KKK membership, which he repeatedly denounced and apologized for since the '60s, or do you still refer to him as a KKK member because he was a Democrat?
You and I agree on something. Let's be friends this year and put all that nonsense behind us.
Oh, I'm happy to defend my own words, which I absolutely choose carefully and deliberately for whatever effect I darn well please. I just wanted to know how you would rationalize away whining about my so-called obsession w/ terminology while turning a blind, hypocritical eye toward others when they do the same. You didn't disappoint.
Actually, the exact opposite is closer to the truth. Religion was certainly misused as a weapon to condone slavery and pacify the enslaved, but it is undeniable that the entire abolitionist movement was founded by and dominated by people of faith, specifically Christians.
If you're going to refer to Christians as idiots -- many of us are -- you should take extra care to ensure you aren't saying idiotic things, and you failed pretty badly there.
The posters involved make huge concessions all the time. They are willing to question and disagree with ‘their side’ all the time. It’s called being honest and real. It’s not some message board game of loyalty. A lot of guys here that basically disagree with most of your stances are plenty critical of trump. It tells us your either blind or you really do believe in the extreme left nonsense. I hope it’s turning a blind eye bc that’s fixable.
"Because all religions endorsed slavery, it was ok?" No dumbass. Slavery has nothing to do with religion. But religion has a lot to do with a moral compass. Can you follow logic?
I chose 250 years. That puts the date to 1759 in case you failed math. 1759 was about the time the Colonies were really getting pissed off at the Crown for taxing them out the ass and doing nothing to help with the Indian problems, restricting where they could fvcking live etc..
There were a bunch of men in the colonies who were very smart and were thinking about how one could draft laws to make a country that fair folks could really get behind. They did not want anything to do with a monarchy. They did not want a church dictating terms. They wanted FREEDOM.
Of course you are so much smarter than those dumbasses. Your IQ is far better than James Madison, Thomas Jefferson, George Washington.............. they were white, stupid and would go along with slavery so that they could create a nation and establish a Constitution that has stood the test of time. Of course at that time you could have come up with a better solution and created a country without slavery. The founders are much dumber than your brilliant ass!
You will not agree that our founders got their ideas from the bible, but they did. They also got those ideas from the revolution against the Holy Catholic church. They got those ideas from the reformation. They got those ideas from the enlightenment. They published their main work in 1789 and they got all of the States to agree to them, it is called the U.S. Constitution and was ratified in 1789.
"It sure as hell wasn't religion that freed the slaves in the US." No sir it was the Civil War and the Emancipation Proclamation initiated by Lincoln. But Lincoln was a religious person who felt that slavery was a sin and was evil. So I state that religion freed the slaves. Hell John Brown gave his life over slavery.
I can't believe you never took American History.
Ever hear of the "quota" system? Where I worked, if you bid on a job, 8 times out of 10 a black person got it over a white person. It happened to me on more than one occasion.
Always an excuse, never own your own legacy. If they were registered Democrat, they were Democrats, no amount of spin will change that. Jim Crow was a Democrat.
- Status
Similar threads
