ADVERTISEMENT

UVA Declines White House Invitation

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bullshit, who on here actually uses their own wife for their avatar??

The first two pages starting midway through the first, is always worth the read.

https://forums.rivals.com/threads/did-unc-basketball-get-away-with-a-loophole.855497/

Well now that Daniel jones is gone y’all may actually stand a chance against us lol.
This is the truth. Jones had nothing but his worst games against Virginia. Wasn't a good matchup, I suppose. Lol. Very happy for him being a top 10 pick. Don't know how smart of a pick he was, the Giants must have seen some promise in him. Or it could be the Manning connection.

And
as far as full frontal male nudity I believe if I’m forced to look at tits and shaved vaginas then I should be forced to look at dicks and balls. It’s the right thing to do.
What about hairy vaginas?

I ask about the male nudity because we have this dude called @TheDude1 who constantly sends dick pics in PMs. Just wanted to give you a heads up on that. <--- heads up.
 
KKGx3UV.png

That proves nothing, and implicate less. And it says as much. Nice reach though...
 
  • Like
Reactions: SNU0821
The first two pages starting midway through the first, is always worth the read.

https://forums.rivals.com/threads/did-unc-basketball-get-away-with-a-loophole.855497/


This is the truth. Jones had nothing but his worst games against Virginia. Wasn't a good matchup, I suppose. Lol. Very happy for him being a top 10 pick. Don't know how smart of a pick he was, the Giants must have seen some promise in him. Or it could be the Manning connection.


What about hairy vaginas?

I ask about the male nudity because we have this dude called @TheDude1 who constantly sends dick pics in PMs. Just wanted to give you a heads up on that. <--- heads up.


RollLaughRollLaughRollLaughWhatever happened to that UNC guy? Has he disappeared forever?


Apparently the decision to pick Jones stemmed from his performance at the Senior Bowl. That's supposedly what set him apart, that and his professionalism.


I don't mind hairy vaginas as long as I don't have to go down on one.

Lol well after seeing Durdens (the rapist) dick on tMB nothing scares me anymore.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lurkeraspect84
Apparently you can buy toupees for the vagina...

91K95AZ5SBL._UX679_.jpg
Letting the wife know.....she just said they're called merkins.

Fake ass wives(amirite @Unc fan in ky ) with their fake hair, lips, breast and now pubic hair. "IS NOTHING SACRED?".

Until they hold a fleshlight down their I'm still good.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: cavs124
RollLaughRollLaughRollLaughWhatever happened to that UNC guy? Has he disappeared forever?


Apparently the decision to pick Jones stemmed from his performance at the Senior Bowl. That's supposedly what set him apart, that and his professionalism.


I don't mind hairy vaginas as long as I don't have to go down on one.

Lol well after seeing Durdens (the rapist) dick on tMB nothing scares me anymore.
He’s still here. He actually never left and will defend himself every time somebody brings up the fake wife.
 
Lol it’s Emma Watson being sexy. My my numero uno celebrity crush by quite a large margin... what else would you like to know?
Asking for a friend(Some here loved her in pigtail), Did you become attracted to her when she turned 18,or from Harry Potter movies?
 
  • Like
Reactions: cavs124
Most every non-local media outlet is biased. I thought everyone felt this way. Some are right and some are left but it is almost impossible to be a balanced station. I don't think one exist, which is kind of to be expected. The only news (besides the local news) show I watch at all is Meet the Press though.
I use to watch Meet The Press, but when Chuck Todd took over, I had to stop, can not stand that smug look he has. He seems to actually try to be un biased, but he just can't pull it off, his Liberalism is just too strong.
Also use to watch Fox News Sunday, but Chris Wallace has gone full blown Leftist now. They use to try and hide it, now they openly show it.
 
What were the media sources? Because most of those types of surveys only speak to a certain type of media coverage and ignore the wealth of talk radio, opinion sites, Twitter, Facebook groups, etc... that increasingly reflect how people (and particularly those seeking a narrative contra the MSM) consume their news. So while I have no doubt that Trump has faced serious negative coverage in the mainstream press, there's an increasingly large proportion of people for whom those outlets are nigh irrelevant.

Wasn't sure myself, so I had to do a bit of searching. The obvious omission from this study, was Fox. So let's say Fox was only 1% negative. If the 4 major networks each had a 25% distribution, that would put the overall negativity assessment at 70%, which is still incredibly high.

octchart.jpg
 
Wasn't sure myself, so I had to do a bit of searching. The obvious omission from this study, was Fox. So let's say Fox was only 1% negative. If the 4 major networks each had a 25% distribution, that would put the overall negativity assessment at 70%, which is still incredibly high.

octchart.jpg
14-Tone_of_Coverage_on_Cable_News.png


Welcome to capitalism.
 
^The main reason the russian collusion investigation was a waste of time is that it didn't matter what the findings were going to be for these news networks---they were only going to accept one answer.
People seek out news today to confirm their beliefs. Very few people are open to having an honest conversation. The ‘my team’ stuff is pretty bad.
 
People seek out news today to confirm their beliefs. Very few people are open to having an honest conversation. The ‘my team’ stuff is pretty bad.
It’s a total turnoff to all of it. I don’t want to hitch my wagon to either party bc neither resemble anything that I would consider classic blue/red. Each party keeps stepping up the childish crazy on the other...so much so, that it’s almost become acceptable
 
It’s a total turnoff to all of it. I don’t want to hitch my wagon to either party bc neither resemble anything that I would consider classic blue/red. Each party keeps stepping up the childish crazy on the other...so much so, that it’s almost become acceptable
I have become numb to it. Don't even shake my head anymore. Even find it worth a laugh.
 
I think it'll be interesting to see what comes out of the infrastructure meeting today. It SHOULD be a bipartisan issue, like criminal justice reform, but my guess is it gets blown into a partisan circus just like immigration. Maybe I'm just being pessimistic.
 
I think it'll be interesting to see what comes out of the infrastructure meeting today. It SHOULD be a bipartisan issue, like criminal justice reform, but my guess is it gets blown into a partisan circus just like immigration. Maybe I'm just being pessimistic.
We might get lucky and they decide on something great together----then they can battle for who gets credit.
 
I think it'll be interesting to see what comes out of the infrastructure meeting today. It SHOULD be a bipartisan issue, like criminal justice reform, but my guess is it gets blown into a partisan circus just like immigration. Maybe I'm just being pessimistic.
Trump should have followed tax breaks with a comprehensive infrastructure bill. Dems have been clamoring for infrastructure for years. This would have put them in a pickle. Really hope the two sides can meet here.
 
Wasn't sure myself, so I had to do a bit of searching. The obvious omission from this study, was Fox. So let's say Fox was only 1% negative. If the 4 major networks each had a 25% distribution, that would put the overall negativity assessment at 70%, which is still incredibly high.

octchart.jpg

Right, and it's still a study of a few TV stations. They have a ton of reach, sure, but so do other forms of media. And it's still only a measure of negative coverage, which does not necessarily equal bias even among the political right; consider that Trump is divisive even within traditional conservative spheres (from Romney to Kristol to Kasich), which are those parts of conservatism that are most represented in traditional media.

I'm not saying that Trump hasn't received a lot of negative press (he has) and even outright bias (he has, although the extent is certainly debatable), but I think the "herp derp 90% negative" (not you, but there are some here that read that way) is pretty misleading.
 
Somehow I think Trump tries to leverage his wall into this.

Which is more important, the wall, or the infrastructure. My vote would be for the latter
 
Somehow I think Trump tries to leverage his wall into this.

Which is more important, the wall, or the infrastructure. My vote would be for the latter
I think they're both very important. I hope he tries to rope immigration into this. He broad immigration changes. Dems want infrastructure. Let's make it happen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bert Higginbotha
I think they're both very important. I hope he tries to rope immigration into this. He broad immigration changes. Dems want infrastructure. Let's make it happen.
Immigration reforms such as DREAM, yes I’m all for, but let’s be honest, the wall is fcking stupid and a huge waste of tax payer dollars.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dattier and Sevro
Immigration reforms such as DREAM, yes I’m all for, but let’s be honest, the wall is fcking stupid and a huge waste of tax payer dollars.
Disagree, don't think it's a waste at all. I think a wall is an important part of border security. It's not the end all be all, but it is a part. The three pronged approach of border, people and technology seems to be a good way to go.
 
I am not in the, fists in the air chanting build the wall crowd. But I do find it interesting that so many people say how stupid the wall would be and go with the narrative that walls don't work even though it has been proven all over the world that walls work. Hell, not one peep about it being a waste of our money to go build walls in other countries.
 
Disagree, don't think it's a waste at all. I think a wall is an important part of border security. It's not the end all be all, but it is a part. The three pronged approach of border, people and technology seems to be a good way to go.

That wall is not going to deter anything. Trump just wants built for his own honor. The biggest problem with border security is the current checkpoints. I'll agree those need huge improvements, but a wall is just a waste of money. Its too easy to circumvent.
 
I am not in the, fists in the air chanting build the wall crowd. But I do find it interesting that so many people say how stupid the wall would be and go with the narrative that walls don't work even though it has been proven all over the world that walls work. Hell, not one peep about it being a waste of our money to go build walls in other countries.

Where do the walls work?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT