I'd actually like their chances if GS just didn't add Durant.If Bron had Scottie and Rodman and Kukoc and the rest, would you like their chances against GSW? I sure as hell would.
I'd actually like their chances if GS just didn't add Durant.If Bron had Scottie and Rodman and Kukoc and the rest, would you like their chances against GSW? I sure as hell would.
No doubt. Probably a close game if Lebron didn't even play. Maybe Cavs by a point?Nope. GSW best team of all time. LeBron had plenty of help in their win last night as well as Boston crapping themselves.
Lebron was missing his best player. And if you chose your top 5 players between both teams after Lebron, could easily see picking all Celtics.So he beats a team without their 2 best players and he's the goat cause of it?
The Pierce, Garnett, Rondo, Allen team was not great?a team that scores 76 at home in Game 7 is not a prime time team. LeBron has never faced a great team in the eastern conference
The Pierce, Garnett, Rondo, Allen team was not great?
No.
Allen only counts when he helped LeBron in Miami .
People will look down on him less if he had lost before the finals. Am I wrong?So take the MJ route and not even get to the Finals? I guess.
so never mind MJ came back and played the last 18 games and they couldn't get by a team who was swept in the Finals?
32-31? What do you suspect these Cavs would be if Lebron were out? I doubt they win 32 for the season.I would love to see Kobe, LeBron, and anyone else take almost 2 years off from professional basket and come back and lead a ok but not great team to the NBA Finals. Bulls were 32-31 and the 9th seed when Jordan returned. Not a good team. When Jordan returned they went 13-4 the 17 games after Jordan returned and got the 5th seed.
I think this era thing is overblown. Each would figure it out and be dominant in the other era. and I'm old enough to have seen MJs entire career.I grew up a Bulls fan, watching Jordan. I'm not a Lebron fan nor a Lebron hater. With that said I still got to rank Jordan ahead of Lebron but there is no denying that Lebron has at least made it debatable and he isn't even done yet.
Now with that said, if you switch teams and each other played in each other's era. How many championships do you think Jordan has and how many do you think Lebron has?
32-31? What do you suspect these Cavs would be if Lebron were out? I doubt they win 32 for the season.
The guy had played 10 seasons. You really think he can't get ready in 18 games? In his second NBA season, he also played only 18 games. Difference was instead of coming back from PLAYING baseball, he came back from a broken foot.
He was so out of sorts he scored 112 points in his first 2 playoff games against the Celtics.
Come on.
I don't think MJ would be as dominant in this era. I think he'd be in the same tier of the group of guys like Westbrook, Durant, Harden, Curry, Davis. I think Lebron would still clearly be the best.
Guys are faster and more athletic now thanks to better resources and more available knowledge in general.
That a player from 20 years ago would still manage to be in the top 10 in the current NBA still says a lot about him though.
I’ll see your 5 games and raise you, LeBron and Scottie and Rodman and Kukoc and company dispatch this Boston team in 4 games.LeBron just finished off a team in 7 that MJ would have finished in 5.
But Harper, Pippen, Rodman, and Kukoc wouldn't be near the role players in today's game. They'd be lucky to be as good as Lebrons role players.LeBron on Iggy
Harper (great defender) on Curry
Pippen (league’s best defender) on KD
Rodman on Draymond (how much fun would this be?)
Kukoc on Klay
Bron’s Bulls take it in 6.
That was the season that he came out of retirement and he only played in 17 games that season.Bill Simmons made a funny point on his podcast not too long ago, about how the NBA has buried all evidence of MJ losing in the '95(?) playoffs because God forbid we show Jordan in a state of weakness. He was kidding, but it's true. We only remember MJ's greatness these days, and he was, and still probably is the GOAT, for now.
That's interesting. I think people get it in their minds that MJ was the greatest ever forever and don't consider any other possibility. I guess both could be true....he could eventually pass MJ. I just think people get caught in the moment and forget how damn good MJ was.
But Harper, Pippen, Rodman, and Kukoc wouldn't be near the role players in today's game. They'd be lucky to be as good as Lebrons role players.
Jordon wouldn't be as good in today's game, but his role players would.
LaughingYour post is total BS. No one today could check Jordan and he was also a lock down defender. Defenses back in the day were more physical. If Jordan played today he’d average 40 a game.
A little surprised as you don't strike me as one of those irrational posters who pays no attention to an opposing viewpoint.Come on man. That 32-31 team showed that Jordan didn't just join some great team and fail to make the Finals that year. Wasn't in any way comparing that to LeBron or the Cavs so don't go that route. I was comparing conditioning and rust. Not the teams they were on.
Also yes they would struggle to get back to their full ability in 18 games after almost 2 years off. Many players at the time even said that wasn't the same Michael Jordan in 1995 and he wasn't truly back until 1996. Baseball isn't anywhere close to the same conditioning as basketball.
Also Jordan coming back from the foot injury was 4 months off, practicing when cleared and at the age of 23. Jordan when he returned from retirement was after 21 months off and at the age of 32 coming from a sport with completely different conditioning. That is a huge difference. Jordan when he came from retirement had some huge games but also had some struggles because his timing and conditioning was off.
LeBron is the most physically talented player the NBA has every seen but he's still human. It would take more than 20 games for LeBron to get back into game conditioning, timing, and comfort level with teammates after almost 2 years off.
Yeah. with his Bulls' team. when MJ played teams who had more talent he usuallyLeBron just finished off a team in 7 that MJ would have finished in 5.
18 and comical so many think this is not enough time to get in shape......but 9-10 games in preseason where he barely plays can do it.That was the season that he came out of retirement and he only played in 17 games that season.
And he was playing baseball. So, the legs were rested, buuuut he couldn’t get into basketball shape? The excuses are laughable. MJ crowd just wants to pretend that season didn’t exist. We get it.18 and comical so many think this is not enough time to get in shape......but 9-10 games in preseason where he barely plays can do it.
I think much more the latter, but you are right.That's interesting. I think people get it in their minds that MJ was the greatest ever forever and don't consider any other possibility. I guess both could be true.
Hilarious.Your post is total BS. No one today could check Jordan and he was also a lock down defender. Defenses back in the day were more physical. If Jordan played today he’d average 40 a game.
I think much more the latter, but you are right.
It's weird so many cannot appreciate what Lebron has done without a "yeah but MJ...." reply
sure it is. Never mind players are probably bigger, faster and stronger. If not, they certainly have not gone down in these areas.But true.
A little surprised as you don't strike me as one of those irrational posters who pays no attention to an opposing viewpoint.
Yes, they were 32-31.. You really think THIS Cavs team could play around .500 without Lebron? How about win 55 as the Bulls did the previous season without him? You claim not to be comparing, but I'm showing you the difference and it's a flawed argument by you.
How many games do you think they play in training camp to get ready? 10? And they usually skip half or more. Are you thinking MJ was not playing basketball at all during his "retirement" to stay in shape?
Jordan, when he played full seasons, also had some huge games and some where he wasn't his best (though some MJ lovers don't think those games exist...not saying you are one).
https://shutupandjam.net/nba-ncaa-stats/ht-by-pos/sure it is. Never mind players are probably bigger, faster and stronger. If not, they certainly have not gone down in these areas.
Are you one of the "but there is no handchecking" guys?
Newsflash - there is handchecking allowed in the NBA. Because they once said it was outlawed does not mean that lasted long. Or do you believe there is still a no flopping rule or no arguing with referee rule?
sure it is. Never mind players are probably bigger, faster and stronger. If not, they certainly have not gone down in these areas.
Are you one of the "but there is no handchecking" guys?
Newsflash - there is handchecking allowed in the NBA. Because they once said it was outlawed does not mean that lasted long. Or do you believe there is still a no flopping rule or no arguing with referee rule?