🤣 ----SO now the argument changes? You said he had to sit at the end of the game during IU's run....I point out he didn't, and what do you know----Different argument arises.🤣It was his third foul at the 18 minute mark that caused him to sit for a fair amount of the second half. Not his 4th.
The point remains the same, fouls that aren’t fouls affect the game more than just the 2 free points.
Next time, bring a better talking point than ‘It only affects the game THEN’.
Btw-this conversation coming from you is always ironic, especially considering how much you spend talking about the reffing in your last game vs NW. Almost like you talk out of both sides of your mouth on the issue (and both of those sides are retarted this case)
"Fouls that arent fouls affect the game more"----Wtf does this even mean?
How did that tech effect the game anymore than the other 3? Is one foul more impaortant? Is a missed GT call with 19 minutes to play, more important than one made with 5 seconds?
Yep I complain about the officiaiting....Thought the 2nd tech on Woodson was absolutely terrible. I think Scirotto is a ****tard... Difference is princess----I don't blame them for IU losing...Or whine for two days over a technical foul called ,with still 25+ minutes to play.