How much should we consider who each player had during ages 18 to 20. Arguably the most important years in one's development?
Dean Smith vs ?Maybe Paul Silas?
Dean Smith vs ?Maybe Paul Silas?
Yeah. I’ve mentioned that. Bron has been coaching himself his entire life, for the most part. Tutelage was minimal, at best.How much should we consider who each player had during ages 18 to 20. Arguably the most important years in one's development?
Dean Smith vs ?Maybe Paul Silas?
Hahaha. Wow. Now there’s a new defense. And one of the silliest I’ve read. Imagine how much more we’d know about his gambling and the fact that he was an asshole, if the media and clickbait were up his ass today. Jordan is very lucky he played then and not now.In today's world of PEDS HGH and Stem Cells imagine how Jordan would be dominating the league at the same age as LBJ is now, this debate is for people that dont appreciate the past and facts. The media coverage and hyperbole is 1000x worse than in Jordans day also and this comparison gets ridiculous clicks from the minions
Still a bit insulting to see this comparison...
Hahaha. Wow. Now there’s a new defense. And one of the silliest I’ve read. Imagine how much more we’d know about his gambling and the fact that he was an asshole, if the media and clickbait were up his ass today. Jordan is very lucky he played then and not now.
This is just silly. But, I’ll accept your Tar Heel card and move on.Jordan would of torched any player in this era and it wouldn’t of been competitive.
I’m honestly in alignment w you, but Bron has like 4-5 more years and he’s still in his prime. Like I said, Bron will END UP the GOAT, especially after all these MJ fanboys die off.I think this has been a pretty good debate. I think some people are on the side of “he’s already better” and some “he will never pass Jordan.” Im of the mindset of Jordan is the GOAT as of now, but LeBron can pass him if certain things happen.
This is just silly. But, I’ll accept your Tar Heel card and move on.
Let me know when MJ knocks off a 73-win team on their home court in a Game 7 of the Finals.If it was winner take all for my soul, I'm picking Jordan every time.
Option of Jordan or lebron in a game 7 of the finals, Jordan everytime.
Jordan in his prime > Lebron in his prime.
So far can't match 3 round 1 exits either.Already in same conversation as Wilt , Jordan and debatably Kobe Bryant. Can't match Jordan without 6 titles.
Yep.....only titles count. 50-loss seasons, out in round 1? Ignore them.Bill Simmons made a funny point on his podcast not too long ago, about how the NBA has buried all evidence of MJ losing in the '95(?) playoffs because God forbid we show Jordan in a state of weakness. He was kidding, but it's true. We only remember MJ's greatness these days, and he was, and still probably is the GOAT, for now.
This is really the bottom line.I'm with you I think on this one.....MJ still the GOAT now, but to say Lebron is not nor can ever be in the discussion is silly.
well he's retired now sooo..Let me know when MJ knocks off a 73-win team on their home court in a Game 7 of the Finals.
so 20 years wasn't long enough? Lebron did it in year 13.Winkingwell he's retired now sooo..
Paul Silas > Dean smith?The career path with the red carpet laid out for you, marketing teams spending millions upon millions of dollars to make sure everybody knows you're great, and NBA coaching at 18 instead of college coaching is clearly the easier path. How is this even a question?
I know you aren't anti Lebron in posting that......what I wonder is it how many DIFFERENT teammates. would imagine changing teams would add to Lebron's as well as FA not being as prevalent when MJ played. For instance, MJ played on a 10 year contract.I saw a stat for how many All Star teammates LBJ and MJ each played with during their Finals appearances. MJ played with 5 I believe, while LeBron is at 10 +. He's had a lot of help over the years, more than MJ ever did. I will say, what LBJ did in 07 with zero help was absolutely amazing. Even though he did get swept in the Finals
Why can't stats make him better? More assists and rebounds/game doesn't count? Slightly better FG% and much better 3 pt%?I just want to hear what makes him greater. It's not stats and it's not championships. So what is it? The eye test?
But he did win without Wade, Bosh, Love or Kyrie. at least 2 each time he won.Scottie is one guy, though. You could say LBJ never won without Wade, never won without Bosh, never won without Kyrie, or Love. I think Scottie is a great player, too. But there's a difference in needing one future HOF to help and 2 or 3.
I think leading BOTH teams in points, rebounds, assists steals and blocks in a Finals needa a mention.I've been too busy throwing counter punches.
Bron will own like every stat in the book when he's done, but do we want to go over all of those? But, one of my favorites is Bron leading his team in scoring, assists, and rebounds 62 times in the playoffs. Second best are Duncan and Bird at 21. The dude does it ALL. I would point to some things I already said, like the spotlight was unreal on the kid. He had nary the tutelage of MJ. No father figure, like ever. He's done a thousand times more for his community and is willing to speak, not just smile for the cameras and sell shoes like MJ. He's been to 7 straight Finals. He is currently carrying a team on his back in his 15th season. I think right now it's tough to say LBJ over MJ, but by the time he hangs em up, we'll know he's the GOAT. And, 20 years after his career, when it has time to marinate and many of his supporters are too old to use the Internets or dead god forbid, it won't even be a debate. I've left a laundry list out, but don't want to carry on too long.
Maybe because MJ had a 10 year contract, then was signed for $37 million for one year?Michael Jordan didn't retreat to a new team every time he lost a Finals series
Edited: Because Jordan never lost a Finals series. LeBron has lost 5
Maybe because MJ had a 10 year contract, then was signed for $37 million for one year?
Yes....$37 million in the 90s. Let that sink in. where was he gonna go?
I'd say results in Finals one was clearly superior to the other, not sure that means MJ was clearly superior.....though that Dallas night might make this the case.Eh. LeBron has one Finals appearance when he had zero help, MJ has 0. I think we can agree on that, right? MJ didn't get to the Finals until he had Pippen and LBJ didn't get there until he had Wade and Bosh. He also has had Kyrie his past 3 Finals trips. So I could argue that without help, MJ and LBJ have one Finals trip between them, that going to LeBron. Getting to my actual point now, when both are in the Finals, MJ has just been better. 6 - 0 with 6 MVPs. You could argue LBJ has faced better teams in the Finals, and given the GSW recently, I'll give that to you. Anyways, TL;DR, neither guy made it to the Finals without help sans 2007, but when both had help and good teams, one has/was clearly superior to the other.
It's funny you go out of your way to make excuses wherever Lebron might have an edge, but for some reason you don't do the same when the tables are turned?He gets more boards than Jordan because they played different positions. And James has only managed one or two more than the smaller Jordan; so James barely has an advantage in a garbage stat. Assists are a more meaningful stat than boards and James averages more assists but also more turnovers in the process. Assist/turnover ratio is what matters, and both players have a virtually identical ratio. It should also be noted that James has played with more talented players than Jordan, on the whole, and definitely more shooters. It stands to reason that he'd have more assists, he had more to pass to after the original Cavaliers years.
The off the court and community crap shouldn't come into the equation. We're comparing basketball players, not philanthropists. Both guys are kind of douchebags personality-wise. LeBron just tries to hide it better, but the locker room spats with teammates and coaches punctuates my point.
Jordan did it ALL, just like LeBron does.
If college titles count, can we count Lebron's titles in HS? Off the top of my head he had 2.Did Mj take one or two years off when he went to play baseball and retired. You would think he could’ve had 1 or 2 more titles had he never left. Plus you have to consider he won a natty in college which gives him 7 titles. How many players in the history of the NBA have won two 3peats? That’s downright domination. I also saw a stat where MJ has like 18 more 40 point games in the playoffs then Lebron, and MJ accomplished this in less NBA playoff games which is crazy to think.
4. Didn't MJ pass off for a game winner? Not sure either NEEDED someone else to close.1. I admitted in my post that is the one finals he made with no help
2. He had help until the very end. You can argue that series he didn't have anyone, but he had plenty of help before hand.
3. What about averages? LBJ has played more playoff games, averages are a lot more meaningful in these comparisons
4. Disagree. LeBron needed Kyrie to close. MJ was always the closer for the Bulls. I think that says a lot.
I have no issue in the latter spot, but statistically, at least in playoff games for sure, Lebron has been better last time I saw this stat.It always comes back to this for me:
If I’m building a team, I’m taking Lebron every time because of his versatility and sheer dominance across multiple positions.
If I’m down by 10 and need buckets, or down by 2 with 5 seconds left, im taking Jordan because he is a better scorer than anyone I’ve ever seen play.
It is pretty incredible......but when MJ left, his team still won 55 games without him. when Lebron left the Cavs they were a dreg. when he came back they were in the Finals. Miami fell off the map the first year or 2 after Lebron left them, as well.I will definitely say Lebron is the best player... of his time. I love watching him, but I'd give the edge to MJ.
He came to the league 2 years older, won 3 championships, left to play baseball, came back to win 3 more championships, retired for 3 years, came back for 2 years as a publicity stunt and still averaged 37min and 20ppg as a 39 year old.
I AM sure I'll never see one playing for my team again.I do love me some MJ, don't get me wrong. He's just not my favorite! I've actually grown quite fond of LBJ over the years as well. I used to be a HUGE hater, back when he single handily beat my Pistons in the playoffs. But over the years I've just come to appreciate his greatness. I'm not sure if I'll see a player like LeBron in my lifetime again. He's that special.
MJ went down in round 1 three times. That's better than losing in the Finals?Lebron Already lost his chance when he got swept by Spurs in 2007. MJ the GOAT had a perfect 6/6 record in NBA finals, at 100% winning percentage he’s undefeated in the finals. If you lose once in the finals, the best you can be is #2 all time.
MJ went down in round 1 three times. That's better than losing in the Finals?
I'll argue that do you honestly believe that one of those LeBron led teams in the 2000s or even the Cavs teams of the last few years would have made it past either or those Celtic or Pistons teams of the 80s? Those teams were full of past and present all-stars and those losses in the 1st round to the Bucks in year 1 and Celtics in year 2 and 3 Jordan played on rosters far worse than anything LeBron has had.
I love the argument and to me it's not clearly obvious either way. Someone argues in LeBron's favor that Jordan never played anyone in the Finals as good as the Spurs or Warriors teams but then Jordan fans could also argue that LeBron never had to go through eastern conference playoffs as rough as Jordan had to go through in the late 80s and 90s. It's all back and forth and there's no clear answer. I stopped really debating this and just enjoying watching LeBron play and hoping he loses and then turning around and watching Jordan games on YouTube.
The Cavs teams of the last few years would not have been seeded so low to have to play the Cs in round 1.I'll argue that do you honestly believe that one of those LeBron led teams in the 2000s or even the Cavs teams of the last few years would have made it past either or those Celtic or Pistons teams of the 80s? Those teams were full of past and present all-stars and those losses in the 1st round to the Bucks in year 1 and Celtics in year 2 and 3 Jordan played on rosters far worse than anything LeBron has had.
I love the argument and to me it's not clearly obvious either way. Someone argues in LeBron's favor that Jordan never played anyone in the Finals as good as the Spurs or Warriors teams but then Jordan fans could also argue that LeBron never had to go through eastern conference playoffs as rough as Jordan had to go through in the late 80s and 90s. It's all back and forth and there's no clear answer. I stopped really debating this and just enjoying watching LeBron play and hoping he loses and then turning around and watching Jordan games on YouTube.
Think he’s undefeated, which is crazy. Although I’ll argue that up until this year, the east has been pretty weak during LBJs run. Like, extremely weak.What’s Bron’s first round record? Is he undefeated or something like that? Sorry if it’s been mentioned already.
How many of those scrub western conference teams the Bulls beat up on were better than the past two Golden State teams?
Funny thing is, even Lebron would admit Jordan is the greatest and he has stated this multiple times. Mj is who he and Kobe try to emulate. He was their idol growing up.