I feel sorry for you if you believe the two are anywhere close.
I feel bad for anybody who thinks Kamala isn’t qualified.
I feel sorry for you if you believe the two are anywhere close.
I would suppose she is.....but is she remotely a great choice other then direct pandering to voters by being selected bc of her gender and color?I feel bad for anybody who thinks Kamala isn’t qualified.
I would suppose she is.....but is she remotely a great choice other then direct pandering to voters by being selected bc of her gender and color?
I don't think anyone feel she is not qualified...But more of she was primarily chosen due to her gender. Which to me, would be an insult.I feel bad for anybody who thinks Kamala isn’t qualified.
I don't think anyone feel she is not qualified...But more of she was primarily chosen due to her gender. Which to me, would be an insult.
I never felt race was more of an issue, opposed to gender. I know Biden flat out said he was going to pick a female. I don't recall him ever saying (specifically) a "black female". Maybe he did.And race. She was chosen for her gender and race, in part. No white men (or women) were harmed.
And more than a couple of the usual suspects here made the argument she was not qualified shortly after Biden picked her.
Well, I called it accurately. A pick not based on actual merit is wrong and pretty dangerous considering.
Agree. And if I were said candidate, or ever chosen b/c of my gender/race, I personally would be insulted.Well, I called it accurately. A pick not based on actual merit is wrong and pretty dangerous considering.
The question should be...was there many many people excluded that had equal or greater merit...due to racial and gender bias. The answer is yes. Is it common. Yep. Is it just the dems..no. Does it make it right. No.Kamala didn’t merit the pick?
The question should be...was there many many people excluded that had equal or greater merit...due to racial and gender bias. The answer is yes. Is it common. Yep. Is it just the dems..no. Does it make it right. No.
For a party that incessantly professes to fight against gender and racial bias...it’s strange to hear crickets when used to possibly benefit Your parties advancement. That’s all.
Hey, I’m done with lifers and aging politicians. After listening to some of these idiots during hearings....they aren’t in touch at all with what the world is nowI don’t think there were many, many more senators to pick from. Her achievements are impressive. Are there senators who have been senators longer? Yes. Does that make them more qualified? No, just older.
Hey, I’m done with lifers and aging politicians. After listening to some of these idiots during hearings....they aren’t in touch at all with what the world is now
Sounds a lot like the cries of hiring in the NBA....Ya know something that the Dems made sure they were heard.I don’t think there were many, many more senators to pick from. Her achievements are impressive. Are there senators who have been senators longer? Yes. Does that make them more qualified? No, just older.
Sounds a lot like the cries of hiring in the NBA....Ya know something that the Dems made sure they were heard.
She was the best candidate from the pool created by Biden....
Do you think she was the best candidate period?
Also, even if she was the best candidate, period---its still a bad look to confine your list to JUST one gender...Can you imagine had Trump said this? Whoa.....
To funny.....Ya know its okay to admit things. It really is. No reason to camouflage it.I think she was the best candidate for the objective they wanted to achieve. Which is all that matters.
To funny.....Ya know its okay to admit things. It really is. No reason to camouflage it.
Trumpers talking about who’s “qualified”
lololol!
[/QUO
Uififuufufuuruxur6: rydttdttdtrdt fuu furuudu
What confuses me is that Harris dropped out out she because she only had about a five percent approval rate among Democrats but she is now a Vice Presidental nominee.Can one the liberals explain that to meHarris has plenty of qualifications to run as vp. It’s not like she is grossly unqualified. But to verbalize publicly you are strictly basing your pick off of skin color and gender is wholly wrong. And it doesn’t justify it to later pick based on actual merit. If you can’t say she was put in a pool based solely on her skin color and gender to start with...then how do we continue and how do you reconcile the fact that these two things were the primary reasons she was even considered. Am I living in an alternate universe? Will you really look the other way on this? You would eat a republican alive
What confuses me is that Harris dropped out out she because she only had about a five percent approval rate among Democrats but she is now a Vice Presidental nominee.Can one the liberals explain that to me
So you are saying that the person one heartbeat from presidency approval rating by the American people is irrelevant especially since most people think that it is her Guly unlikely that Biden serves a full term.InterestingBeing VP has nothing to do with how many people want you to be President. It never has.
So you are saying that the person one heartbeat from presidency approval rating by the American people is irrelevant especially since most people think that it is her Guly unlikely that Biden serves a full term.Interesting
Never had a candidate whose mental acuity cand energy clearly appears to show that there is a very small likelihood that he can finish his term , so you definitely have to consider the qualifications of his running mateYeah, VPs aren’t picked based on who will do the best job if the President dies. Never has been that way.
Never had a candidate whose mental acuity cand energy clearly appears to show that there is a very small likelihood that he can finish his term , so you definitely have to consider the qualifications of his running mate
Tell us how she is qualified.I feel bad for anybody who thinks Kamala isn’t qualified.
Um, no he wasnt.Trump was such a candidate. Morbidly obese Taft was, too.
They sure should have for this one. Biden will not fulfill his entire term if elected.Yeah, VPs aren’t picked based on who will do the best job if the President dies. Never has been that way.
Yeah. @Jaycg15 used that exact reference in the other thread. Get your own material.Did you guys hear Tucker’s “the dog ate my homework” conspiracy?
I haven't heard all of it, but are they saying there aren't digital copies? Why on earth would they mail the only copy. Wouldn't they scan and email it or fax it? Something seems pretty fishy on this one.Did you guys hear Tucker’s “the dog ate my homework” conspiracy?
They sure loved to
Yeah. @Jaycg15 used that exact reference in the other thread. Get your own material.
Tell us how she is qualified.
They sure should have for this one. Biden will not fulfill his entire term if elected.
Glad I'm not the only one that sees right through this.They sure loved to
Yeah. @Jaycg15 used that exact reference in the other thread. Get your own material.
It was better when there was one political thread. At least it's not as bad as 2015/16 when there would be 4 or 5.What other thread? Edit: oh I see, I posted this in the wrong one. Dammit
Glad I'm not the only one that sees right through this.
Hey, I’m done with lifers and aging politicians. After listening to some of these idiots during hearings....they aren’t in touch at all with what the world is now
This is my problem and I’ve said it again and again. The lifers care more about lining their pockets than anything that could potentially help their constituents. And it goes from the top of the top on Capital Hill all the way down to local elected officials.
The benefits that congressmen/senators get is insane. Family, staffers, and family of staffers don’t have to pay back student loans? I mean WTF how does that make any sense. It would be bad enough if it was just direct family, but the staff and their family too, geeze. And that’s just the one Perk that rubs me the wrong way the most, for some reason.
Most plausible point to me is that he had emails and phone message from the Biden campIt was better when there was one political thread. At least it's not as bad as 2015/16 when there would be 4 or 5.
I am not sold on the Bobulinski guy. He seems scripted and dirty. What I will say is that unlike most stories about Trump where the vast majority of them originated from anonymous sources. At least this guy puts his face on TV and everyone knows who he is. That merits at least some credibility. That and the lack of denial from the Biden campaign. The only thing Biden has denied is that he took money from foreign countries. Which could technically be true. Plausible deniability is something politicians learn very early.