A member of your damn team was named, so your school was named. This isn't rocket science. This is literally a worse job of deflection than the UNC folks did.
So they said absolutely nothing about Duke at all?
That one of your current players asked for money, jobs and a place to live in order to attend a college. Totally no big deal.
You are correct that this is not rocket science. The difference between the verb "to mention" and the verb "to relate (to)" is elementary school stuff. If the former applies, quote it. Otherwise, you might want to get a second grader to tutor you.
Good god you are dense. If a member of your current roster was mentioned, your team was mentioned. You must need assistance tying your shoes if this is a difficult concept for you to grasp. Keep living in fantasy land I guess.
Like I said, arguing semantics like a 4 year old who can't admit you're wrong. Zion Williamson IS Duke basketball now. If he was mentioned, your program was.
Dude, you're on page 8 of a thread based on 2 paragraphs of text from a court case. Not sure what you were expecting. Welcome to the shitshow.
True. But how likely do you think it is the guy wants to risk perjury charges to stick it to Zion Williamson?
I mean, it was stated under oath. That is good enough for the legal system, so I would assume it is good enough for the NCAA.
... I agreed that it was alleged, and then provided my reasoning for believing the guy.
So then you agree---UK has been mentioned as well?
Yes, Kentucky was mentioned, though none of our players past or current have people on record saying they asked for anything.
If they play Zion, they would have to forfeit any games they play him in. I've already been through this in the current thread. I never accused Duke of cheating, which is why the level of resistance is just stupid.
OK. SO I will ask this.
If the NCAA concludes that Zion took money to attend Kansas....Does Duke get in trouble?
Sure, if they play him. Say they dont---Do they get in trouble? No, they do not. NOW---If Duke were mentioned, then....then they would/could. To insinuate someone is part of something simply b/c of association is silly, Global. Which is exactly what you are doing.
You literally, just restated what I have said...
I didn't insinuate anything. I already said I don't think Duke cheated. Read the damn thread before you start pulling stuff out of your backside.
If Keldon Johnson was on the record for asking for stuff from UCLA, I wouldn't try and deny that UK was involved in the current situation. That would just be dumb. You don't have to be guilty to be involved in a situation. Innocent bystanders are also involved. It is not a difficult concept.
I don't recall the entire Bam story, but it didn't involve him or his family. Think it was his AAU coach? His eligibility isn't in question with what came out.
Yeah----Ok. I know exactly how you, and the rest of BBN would react.
I don’t recall anything about his AAU coach. All I really remember was a notebook that had his name with the amount he received with “2017 draft not signed: bad loan” but I haven’t really kept up with it much.
I think it would be naive any any fan to think their school has clean hands. And yeah, that includes IU; though, I mean, ummm, well....If we were paying for the kids we got---Crean's dumber than I thought. Majority of our most touted recruits were from Indiana. But, I do worry about the likes of Vonleh and Bryant.
I damn sure wouldn't play Keldon J0hnson (if I was Calipari) in this scenario, until the NCAA told me I could and even then you're not safe.
