ADVERTISEMENT

Mark Cuban Asks Calipari to Renew Kentucky/Indiana Series

I am serious...Get a date that works. WE can talk tomorrow. I know the wife would love it. I mean sure she likes going with me(To UK games). But, I mean, ya know---Look, dude---I ain't being the god damn "C" anymore the "CATS, CATS<CATS chant anyomre. Done with that,shit..Laughing
It'll be a while. Still trying to move to Knoxville. Once settled in, Im be all over Kentucky in no time. I have a lot of ground to make up.

we had personal and financial goals to be done before we moved on June 1st, and we've blew them out of the water, but with Covid, it's put everything on hold.
 
Good thing they have the peach basket era to fall back on.

Y’all like to talk shit about UK winning titles back in “the old days” but one little thing I’m not understanding is why doesn’t UNc and IU have titles from those days? Y’all say UK only wins a title every so many years then tell me why UNc and IU hasn’t passed UK???
 
He can bring up the “Cal” era. I’d honestly be embarrassed if UNC had 38 nba draft picks & only 1 title.
That’s just piss poor coaching or bad referees, you can pick.

Is 14-19 bad coaching or poor referees?

And Id wager the paper class scandal didn’t “embarrass” You a bit did it?

14-19 was a result of a ton of injuries, poor shooting & about 8 buzzer beater losses.

why would the AFAM stuff embarrass me? I said from day 1 that UNC broke no rules & as the NCAA ruled, I was right.

Id say both of y’all are a little bit right. About 10% was injury, 40% was bad coaching (Roy letting Cold Anthony shoot shit shots all game long) and the other 50% was Roy throwing his team under the bus and giving up on them. Roy really showed his true colors last season. Knowing he wasn’t even gonna make the NIT so he threw the season away.
 
Y’all like to talk shit about UK winning titles back in “the old days” but one little thing I’m not understanding is why doesn’t UNc and IU have titles from those days? Y’all say UK only wins a title every so many years then tell me why UNc and IU hasn’t passed UK???
Actually UNC has a title from 1924 & a championship from 1957.
 
Sorry to burst your big blue bubble but UCLA is the greatest program of all time.

Tears you up don’t it!Laughing It’s been debated over and over and everyone says UK is #1. I know that hurts your heart but it’s true. You have a hard time seeing the truth about things but we both know deep down that you know UK is number one!!!
 
Tears you up don’t it!Laughing It’s been debated over and over and everyone says UK is #1. I know that hurts your heart but it’s true. You have a hard time seeing the truth about things but we both know deep down that you know UK is number one!!!
The goal every year is to win a championship
UCLA has 11 championships, the only program to have double digit championships.
 
Ya Paul Blart kicked me out of that thread for stating my opinion.
Sure is a tarnished crown you’re wearing.
giphy.gif
 
Mad about what? You’re the one jumping in the conversation about my opinion of UCLA being the goat.
Looks like you’re the one upset.

Ok good...you think UCLA is the greatest. We are all happy for you.
 
Duke before 1984: 0 National titles

UK before 1984: 5 National titles

Pick you dates then show the rest.
Again, perfect example of what I was talking about. When we talk all-time, sure, UK's gonna come out on top. But all-time starts to run thin. Duke has been the best program the past 40 years. Just like there's no arguing UK's been the best CBB program,of all-time----there is no arguing Duke has been the best since 1984.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Noahtogo24
So why the hell did you quote me to begin with?

Dude just give it up. Everyone knows that you’re ate up with UK and even when you say shit that makes you look dumb you’ll say it anyway because you think In your mind that people are gonna believe what you say. Nobody on gods green earth thinks UCLA is number 1, not even you. You just can’t stand the idea that UK is number one all time. That’s what happens when you have a lifetime of excellence in your program. That’s exactly why I love it when dumbasses wanna bring up UK winning titles back in the day. Well, why wasn’t your team doing it!!!! As I’ve said many times before, you know exactly who number one is and even though you won’t say it we all know you know.
 
Last edited:
You all think $500k is a lot but it really isn't. If his stock drops just one draft spot in the top 10, he will will end up a loser in this financially.


Again, perfect example of what I was talking about. When we talk all-time, sure, UK's gonna come out on top. But all-time starts to run thin. Duke has been the best program the past 40 years. Just like there's no arguing UK's been the best CBB program,of all-time----there is no arguing Duke has been the best since 1984.

basically , since the start of the 64 team tourney ?
 
Dude just give it up. Everyone knows that you’re ate up with UK and even when you say shit that makes you look dumb you’ll say it anyway because you think In your mind that people are gonna believe what you say. Nobody on gods green earth thinks UCLA is number 1, not even you. You just can’t stand the idea that UK is number one all time. That’s what happens when you have a lifetime of excellence in your program. That’s exactly why I love it when dumbasses wanna bring up UK winning titles back in the day. Well, why wasn’t your team doing it!!!! As I’ve said many times before, you know exactly who number one is and even though you won’t say it we all know you know.
I guess other teams weren’t winning titles back in the day for the same reason UK has only won one title in 20 years.
Why is it so impossible for me to believe that a program that has won 11 championships, 3 more than the next program, is considered the GOAT?
 
Last edited:
Again, perfect example of what I was talking about. When we talk all-time, sure, UK's gonna come out on top. But all-time starts to run thin. Duke has been the best program the past 40 years. Just like there's no arguing UK's been the best CBB program,of all-time----there is no arguing Duke has been the best since 1984.
No doubt. Some will argue against UK being the best though. They are clearly outnumbered in their opinion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IUfanBorden
Again, perfect example of what I was talking about. When we talk all-time, sure, UK's gonna come out on top. But all-time starts to run thin. Duke has been the best program the past 40 years. Just like there's no arguing UK's been the best CBB program,of all-time----there is no arguing Duke has been the best since 1984.
Bull shit why 1984? In 1984 Duke had won crap.

Duke the best the past 40 years my ass. Why pick 40? Why pick 20?

Why did you pick 1984? Pick 1991. Before that Duke had won nuttin'.

Why not pick UVA and you would only have to go back to the current champion. GEEZE.

Pick the time Borden and get of the anti-Kentucky bandwagon. Pick IU. Pick UNC. Pick IU. Pick UCLA. Pick Ohio St. Pick who ever you choose. GEEZE. GEEZE. GEEZE.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RunninRichie
Again, perfect example of what I was talking about. When we talk all-time, sure, UK's gonna come out on top. But all-time starts to run thin. Duke has been the best program the past 40 years. Just like there's no arguing UK's been the best CBB program,of all-time----there is no arguing Duke has been the best since 1984.

I can live with that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: catman111
Bull shit why 1984? In 1984 Duke had won crap.

Duke the best the past 40 years my ass. Why pick 40? Why pick 20?

Why did you pick 1984? Pick 1991. Before that Duke had won nuttin'.

Why not pick UVA and you would only have to go back to the current champion. GEEZE.

Pick the time Borden and get of the anti-Kentucky bandwagon. Pick IU. Pick UNC. Pick IU. Pick UCLA. Pick Ohio St. Pick who ever you choose. GEEZE. GEEZE. GEEZE.
I picked 1984 b/c that is what MANY, if not ALL historians consider the modern era of college basketball. Its not MY personal time frame.

You are to emotionally involved with UK basketball to have any type of rational discussion.

You don't think Duke has been the best program the past 35 or 40 years? Ok fine. But instead of giving me some emotionally charged, temper-tantrum answer---How about use your intelligence, and explain why they are not?

Again, 1984 isn't a time frame I chose. Just going by what the historians of the game feel is the start of the modern era. You know, those same historians who feel UK is the best CBB of all-time.

Since that time(1984), Duke has won 5 National titles....Been to 12 FF's, and 16 Elite 8's. I am curious Bert, what program has done better?

Here's the issue with not only you, but other UK fans: You cannot be happy with being revered as the CBB's best of all-time. You have to have it all: Best the past 10 years...best the past 20.....Best the last 6 months, etc, etc...You take as an insult to what Kentucky has accomplished....Why? Well, easy---You're a fan of a program that cannot handle hearing that someone else might be a little better of late. TBH, it hurts your feelings.

I love ya Bert. You are a good person...A good friend. But your love for UK hoops blinds you to any type of discussion in this manor.
 
No doubt. Some will argue against UK being the best though. They are clearly outnumbered in their opinion.
You'll get no argument from me. UK is the best program of all-time. Overall,yes. I think its comparable to the Boston Celtics/LA Lakers. Even the Yankee's. All three considered the best of their respective leagues: NBA/MLB. Celts have won 17 NBA titles...Lakers 16. By far the most. Yankee's have won 27 WS titles---16 more than any other team. Hard to argue that those three aren't the greatest of all-time.

BUT.....What I can argue is that they haven't been the greatest the last 10, 20 or 30.. Lakers havent won an NBA title since 2010....Celtics since 2008....Yankee's since 2009. Other franchise's have stepped up. Been better. BUT...It des not change what LA, Boston or the Yankee's have done so OVERALL.

Some just don't wanna hear that. Yet those same, have no issue saying that their team had the best 3 year stretch....or best 5. Or that since Cal has been at UK, Kentucky has done this better, or that. And that is fine. BUT...you cannot have it both ways.







And yes, I understand the Lakers have won 5 titles since 2000. So nitpickers need not apply.
 
ADVERTISEMENT