Such an ignorant approach.Yeah, but his presence made a HUGE difference in '66. He showed that Duke really
was trying to recruit black players and Kentucky wasn't. It would have completely
changed the impact if Duke had won.
Such an ignorant approach.Yeah, but his presence made a HUGE difference in '66. He showed that Duke really
was trying to recruit black players and Kentucky wasn't. It would have completely
changed the impact if Duke had won.
Bullshit!Yeah, but his presence made a HUGE difference in '66. He showed that Duke really
was trying to recruit black players and Kentucky wasn't. It would have completely
changed the impact if Duke had won.
Bullshit!
Rupp wanted to sign Wes Unseld at all cost; however, racist told his family that if he played in the SEC he would be killed in Mississippi, Alabama and Florida. So he signed with Louisville. It happened to others also. By the way Unseld would have been a Soph for UK in 1966.
So please don't start that. Duke is in North Carolina and they were the center of anti-black sentiment.
You can't rewrite history on basketball and racism in one thread.
My information is from Rupp and Joe B. For the uninformed Joe B. was the UK assistant in 1966.Jon Scott aka bigbluehistory has debunked so many of these myths by actually calling those who said/wrote those articles. players and "journalists", instead of citing them.
John Feinstein had a clear bias and was torn to shreds. His books were a long post full of cherry-picked angles and didn't hold up by those who remember.
Man, the shit is getting deep!It looks like Duke prevented some major racial riots from breaking out by losing to UK in the 1996 Final 4 and not being matched up with an all black team.
Duke even then was proving it was America’s Team by doing the right thing all the time.
Yeah, I actually discussed that in the book under the Kentucky and SEC section. It shows what the SEC was like back then.The story that I find equally interesting, in roughly the same time period, is Mississippi State winning multiple SEC titles but not competing in the NCAA Tournament because of some weird rule where they couldn't compete against blacks. After missing multiple NCAA Tournaments where they were eligible, the coach evidently snuck the team out of the state to play against Loyola Chicago. Crazy times that must have been.
Now you’re throwing stones because Duke and their fans don’t see color? I have no idea if Coach K was Asian, Hispanic, or Black, and I really don’t care to find out. In my eyes, he’s just a coach.Man, the shit is getting deep!
Hell Duke still has not had a black coach in basketball or football.
I just saw his huge nose. Game recognizes game.Now you’re throwing stones because Duke and their fans don’t see color? I have no idea if Coach K was Asian, Hispanic, or Black, and I really don’t care to find out. In my eyes, he’s just a coach.
The story that I find equally interesting, in roughly the same time period, is Mississippi State winning multiple SEC titles but not competing in the NCAA Tournament because of some weird rule where they couldn't compete against blacks. After missing multiple NCAA Tournaments where they were eligible, the coach evidently snuck the team out of the state to play against Loyola Chicago. Crazy times that must have been.
Yeah, I actually discussed that in the book under the Kentucky and SEC section. It shows what the SEC was like back then.
Now you’re throwing stones because Duke and their fans don’t see color? I have no idea if Coach K was Asian, Hispanic, or Black, and I really don’t care to find out. In my eyes, he’s just a coach.
Very good point. It took a while but you came around. But you avoid the fact that Kentucky basketball wanted to integrate but was forced not to do so by a few racist states like Mississippi, Louisiana, Florida et.al. It is hard to recruit a black player when there are newspaper articles in some of the cities you will be playing stating that they will kill you.The ACC most certainly was back then. They had just gotten their first black players in that very year.
That was part of the point of the book; Duke, who did not integrate until 1963 after a 15 year battle, and the ACC had NOT represented racial progress in that era. THAT's why if Duke had played the game it would indeed
have had significant racial implications; and much more negative ones that Kentucky.
Very good point. It took a while but you came around. But you avoid the fact that Kentucky basketball wanted to integrate but was forced not to do so by a few racist states like Mississippi, Louisiana, Florida et.al. It is hard to recruit a black player when there are newspaper articles in some of the cities you will be playing stating that they will kill you.
Earlier you lead me to think that Kentucky was behind North Carolina. That lead me to think that you did not follow the game or race relations during that era. I did. UK integrated in 1949.
The only place that I have ever seen the KKK was in North Carolina. Me and two of my Kentucky buddies beat the shit out of two KKK guys and took their little white hats and pissed on them. Man that made them mad!
In my 77 years I have never seen or met a member of the KKK in Kentucky. I am confident that they exist but I have not had any contact with such assholes.