ADVERTISEMENT

Malik Williams (a thread where Steelers is desperately grasping at straws)

It depends, and generally I don’t walk right into a thread and start berating UK’s program arbitrarily.
giphy.gif
 
The George T. Stagg has been dipped into the past weekend, I ‘pologize. But JC and Crazyq surk cawk as posters, let’s be real. My only wish is they’d incorporate some funny banter.
 
The George T. Stagg has been dipped into the past weekend, I ‘pologize. But JC and Crazyq surk cawk as posters, let’s be real. My only wish is they’d incorporate some funny banter.

The funniest thing about some is their lack of humor.
 
I got on here this morning for the first time in about a day, saw this thread title and cackled. RollLaughI was looking so forward to reading this that I waited to get my coffee first. It delivered. I saw some spots where I thought I'd toss in a good-natured "Rustled" or "Rent Free" as the most juvenile things I could think of, but instead held back because I wanted to enjoy the purity of the simple junior high ebb and flow already established. Laughing

@UL_1986, I think the only thing this thread lacked was a drop by from Crazy. Please lets enjoy what we UK & UL fans bring moving forward. It's special. What was called "trying too hard to be relevant" I have to disagree with. This would occur whether there was an audience or not, something the other schools simply can't muster.

We are symbiotic.
 
Last edited:
The corner idea may stick. Tbh, idk, idc I just was drunk last night when I started the thread and wanted to discuss a player on our team that finally showed his worth. If our homeboard had more than 5 people on it, I’d take the conversation there.

....now there's an idea!
 
Very painful game to watch. This team doesn’t understand 1-3-1 defense. Mcmahon is a huge liability on defense. Nwora kept chucking. All around bad. Gotta steak one in Chapel Hill, which looks highly unlikely now.
I watched a little bit of it. Was going back and forth from that game, TCU-KU, and Butler-SH. Seemed like Louisville was about to take control but Pitt kept draining some timely 3s to get back in it. I want to say Louisville was up by 9 or 10 maybe midway through the 2nd half and I turned back to it a few minutes later and it was tied. I did see Pitt shot 53%, tough to win when that happens.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UL_1986
I watched a little bit of it. Was going back and forth from that game, TCU-KU, and Butler-SH. Seemed like Louisville was about to take control but Pitt kept draining some timely 3s to get back in it. I want to say Louisville was up by 9 or 10 maybe midway through the 2nd half and I turned back to it a few minutes later and it was tied. I did see Pitt shot 53%, tough to win when that happens.
That and our turnovers, my lord. We just kept giving them the ball. Very frustrating team to watch.
 
I’m looking forward to the future, but this years team is too inconsistent. Everyone is willing to launch up deep threes, only a couple want to use up energy on defense. I’m still sticking with my 20-11 prediction, but that’s looking like a very unlikely record.

Heck, we have a two week stretch in February of,

Carolina
at FSU
at VT
Duke

Actually we’ll probably be 18-13 (Not 20-11) after looking at the schedule harder. Next year should be fun though.
 
Last edited:
Very painful game to watch. This team doesn’t understand 1-3-1 defense. Mcmahon is a huge liability on defense. Nwora kept chucking. All around bad. Gotta steak one in Chapel Hill, which looks highly unlikely now.


Agree totally. Any team that relies on him to play significant minutes is severely handicapped. has to be wide open to be effective and if he doesn't make shots he's a liability.
 
LOTs of props to Pitt. Every time Louisville would close the gap on a double digit Pitt lead in the 2nd half, Pitt would answer with a run of their own. Truth be told, the game was not as close as the final score indicates; Louisville needed a 17-4 run to get the game into OT, and Pitt missed 17 of 33 FTs. Jeff Capel has some nice young players to build on moving forward.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UL_1986
LOTs of props to Pitt. Every time Louisville would close the gap on a double digit Pitt lead in the 2nd half, Pitt would answer with a run of their own. Truth be told, the game was not as close as the final score indicates; Louisville needed a 17-4 run to get the game into OT, and Pitt missed 17 of 33 FTs. Jeff Capel has some nice young players to build on moving forward.

Congrats on keeping it close on the road...
giphy.gif
 
I’m looking forward to the future, but this years team is too inconsistent. Everyone is willing to launch up deep threes, only a couple want to use up energy on defense. I’m still sticking with my 20-11 prediction, but that’s looking like a very unlikely record.

Heck, we have a two week stretch in February of,

Carolina
at FSU
at VT
Duke

Actually we’ll probably be 18-13 (Not 20-11) after looking at the schedule harder. Next year should be fun though.

"Next year should be fun though."


....yeah, after the FBI investigation hammer drops? Good luck with that.
 
"We're not out of trouble yet....not by a longshot." ---Jerry Eaves, Former U6 player and current host of The Jerry Eaves Show
 
Agree totally. Any team that relies on him to play significant minutes is severely handicapped. has to be wide open to be effective and if he doesn't make shots he's a liability.
He was decent against Miami, because Chris Lyykes is somehow shorter than Mcmahon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RipThru
Im here to do my part to ruin the thread and obsess. What are we ruining and obsessing about?
 
Just your guys usual pathetic m.o. where you try to be clever, but end up looking sad and obsessed.
 
Just your guys usual pathetic m.o. where you try to be clever, but end up looking sad and obsessed.

Call it what you want, but kicking U6 while they're down and while UK owns SCOREBOARD on your asses will continue... especially when you post here thinking we should care what MW is doing.
 
ADVERTISEMENT