Most aren't, yet we always end up with the same shit going on.The difference is this thread wasn’t a bait thread.
Most aren't, yet we always end up with the same shit going on.The difference is this thread wasn’t a bait thread.
It depends, and generally I don’t walk right into a thread and start berating UK’s program arbitrarily.Most aren't, yet we always end up with the same shit going on.
It depends, and generally I don’t walk right into a thread and start berating UK’s program arbitrarily.
It depends, and generally I don’t walk right into a thread and start berating UK’s program arbitrarily.
I don’t though. I may throw a tasteful jab. But I don’t cycle through that same bs rhetoric.Dude.
The George T. Stagg has been dipped into the past weekend, I ‘pologize. But JC and Crazyq surk cawk as posters, let’s be real. My only wish is they’d incorporate some funny banter.
Right, at least post something witty or humorous if you’re on a steady troll. “Does anyone give a shit about the rules!!!”.The funniest thing about some is their lack of humor.
Right, at least post something witty or humorous if you’re on a steady troll. “Does anyone give a shit about the rules!!!”.
I don’t though. I may throw a tasteful jab. But I don’t cycle through that same bs rhetoric.
Nominated for a "Postie"They don't ignore each other because they love going back and forth, pushing each other's buttons. A true lover's quarrel.
I say rather than do something punitive, I nominate that it gets PINNED! This is who we are; the two schools. Everyone else gets a show without a ticket.What do you suggest we do?
There's GOT to be a way to nominate you for "THREAD TITLE OF THE YEAR"! I just keep laughing!excellent game, showing his 5 star potential finally.
The corner idea may stick. Tbh, idk, idc I just was drunk last night when I started the thread and wanted to discuss a player on our team that finally showed his worth. If our homeboard had more than 5 people on it, I’d take the conversation there.
Tough loss. Props to Pitt.Did Malik Williams break through?
Very painful game to watch. This team doesn’t understand 1-3-1 defense. Mcmahon is a huge liability on defense. Nwora kept chucking. All around bad. Gotta steak one in Chapel Hill, which looks highly unlikely now.
I watched a little bit of it. Was going back and forth from that game, TCU-KU, and Butler-SH. Seemed like Louisville was about to take control but Pitt kept draining some timely 3s to get back in it. I want to say Louisville was up by 9 or 10 maybe midway through the 2nd half and I turned back to it a few minutes later and it was tied. I did see Pitt shot 53%, tough to win when that happens.Very painful game to watch. This team doesn’t understand 1-3-1 defense. Mcmahon is a huge liability on defense. Nwora kept chucking. All around bad. Gotta steak one in Chapel Hill, which looks highly unlikely now.
That and our turnovers, my lord. We just kept giving them the ball. Very frustrating team to watch.I watched a little bit of it. Was going back and forth from that game, TCU-KU, and Butler-SH. Seemed like Louisville was about to take control but Pitt kept draining some timely 3s to get back in it. I want to say Louisville was up by 9 or 10 maybe midway through the 2nd half and I turned back to it a few minutes later and it was tied. I did see Pitt shot 53%, tough to win when that happens.
Very painful game to watch. This team doesn’t understand 1-3-1 defense. Mcmahon is a huge liability on defense. Nwora kept chucking. All around bad. Gotta steak one in Chapel Hill, which looks highly unlikely now.
LOTs of props to Pitt. Every time Louisville would close the gap on a double digit Pitt lead in the 2nd half, Pitt would answer with a run of their own. Truth be told, the game was not as close as the final score indicates; Louisville needed a 17-4 run to get the game into OT, and Pitt missed 17 of 33 FTs. Jeff Capel has some nice young players to build on moving forward.
Did you just steal my sig, you basturd??? LaughingCongrats on keeping it close on the road...
![]()
I’m looking forward to the future, but this years team is too inconsistent. Everyone is willing to launch up deep threes, only a couple want to use up energy on defense. I’m still sticking with my 20-11 prediction, but that’s looking like a very unlikely record.
Heck, we have a two week stretch in February of,
Carolina
at FSU
at VT
Duke
Actually we’ll probably be 18-13 (Not 20-11) after looking at the schedule harder. Next year should be fun though.
like clockwork, the inbred shows up."Next year should be fun though."
....yeah, after the FBI investigation hammer drops? Good luck with that.
like clockwork, the inbred shows up.
Can’t help himself.like clockwork, the inbred shows up.
He was decent against Miami, because Chris Lyykes is somehow shorter than Mcmahon.Agree totally. Any team that relies on him to play significant minutes is severely handicapped. has to be wide open to be effective and if he doesn't make shots he's a liability.
Just your guys usual pathetic m.o. where you try to be clever, but end up looking sad and obsessed.