First of all, don't even go there with "Wake would have beaten UK last night if Richards was out with foul trouble". Richards was in serious foul trouble last night against a much better team on the road, a team that had just reeled off three very impressive wins, but it didn't matter. Wake Forest had 4 conference wins in a very down ACC.
Thing is, you can't just shut one guy down on UK and think that they're beat, because that has been tested in every game this year, whereas if you take Jones OR Carey out, Duke is in trouble.
Secondly, I never said UK was a "great" defensive team. I said "very good". And you know what, they are very good, you only have to watch them to know. The metrics consider the full season, but the last 2 months, UK has been an exceptional defensive team. They're 15-2 in their last 17 games. That includes wins over Louisville, @ Texas Tech, Florida, @LSU, @ Arkansas (full strength) and @ Tennessee. You aren't going 15-2 if you have a weak defense AND turn the ball over 15+ times a game.
Sorry, but duke has not looked very good at all lately. Should have lost at UNC, lost badly at NCSU, lost at Clemson and lost at Wake. The amount of points duke is giving up to NIT teams (and worse) is alarming, but the way the metrics are set up, it doesn't effect them. Congrats.