Do you know how stupid and irrational it is to act like a double dribble no call in the first half mattered but a no call foul mid-way in the 2nd half of a game didn't matter as much as the end?
I think Arizona has been extremely implicated, so you are wrong there.
You keep saying that everyone sees through it yet only Kentucky fans are responding negatively to me ITT. Coincidence?
You keep doing you, Jarms. Congrats on coming back under a new alias because you were so rustled at the outcome of the UNC trial. And if you aren't Jarms, you might as well be.
Hey buddy, let me ask you this, if there is no difference between the beginning/middle of the game and the end of the game, why did the ncaa decide to stop the clock after every made basket at the end of the game?
Look, I don' care what happened in the duke game, but if you think things that happen in the regular flow of the beginning and middle of the game are the same as what happens in crunch time, you're insane.
The last 4 minutes of the game, in a tight game especially, are played much differently than the rest of the game. The team in the lead runs their offense based on the clock, the team trailing is trying to get every possession they can and score as fast as they can.
In most cases, teams foul to stop the clock and whether you believe it or not, referees know what's happening, they know the trailing team wants to foul to stop the clock and they know there are certain fouls that shouldn't be called.
The last 4 minutes of a college basketball game are managed, played, set up, timed and called differently than the rest of the game.
Again, I don't care what happened in the Duke vs UCF game, both teams deserved to win and both teams deserved to lose.