Tomorrow, NIKE joins the cheating party.
- Thread starter HRTheCard
- Start date
We should have another team in the sweet 16. Turge didn’t switch to zone fast enough. LSU has a massive coaching problem, they didn’t have a clue what to do against the zone. It takes serious talent to make Turge look good.
It was a no call, which Travis gets his own offensive rebound. So they would have had to foul him anyway. Not the same thing at all bud.
So by saying this, you agree that calls earlier in the game have the same effect as calls late in the game? Because the double dribble happened with several several minutes left.
Both effected the game in the same way. A no call at the beginning has the same effect as it does at the end.
If so, then quit about Duke. Tacko should’ve picked up his 4th with 9 minutes to go.
If not, then the double dribble didn’t effect the game nearly as much as the foul on Wofford late.
On the flip side. You brought up Duke winning because of bad calls/no calls but you mentioned nothing about the god awful charge called on Zion that led to UCF having the ball and scoring on a putback where the ball never touched the rim and should have been a shot clock violation. Same play, Tacko held Javin down with his left arm while he rebounded it with his right. No mention of a horrible foul called on a three point shot that led to UCF taking a 2 point lead that would eventually lead to the 4 point lead that led to that last play that you guys arr crying so much about. If we're being honest, if the refs didn't hose Duke from 2 minutes left to 30 seconds, UCF is likely fouling Duke to extend the game with 30 seconds left and the final play never happens.
charge on zion......push by barrett, delaurier with a hook and hold... foul on UCF player taking the shot....... im pretty sure the refs swallowing the whistle saved ur butts.
Zion should of picked up his 8th with the charge at the end.........we all know the guy and Barrett are protected... just like Davis in 2012 was somewhat protected... but at least Davis fouled out of a game........ has Zion or Barrett?
Not a no call at all. Ref didn’t call the foul until after the missed shot. He only got the rebound because he created all of the contact.
We're going to have to whipe the floor beneath you. Would not want you to slip on your tears and hurt yourself.
But they actually played in that game. You’re bitching about the officiating in a game UK didn’t even play in. At some point you have to let it go.
I meant it should have been a no call but the point was moot because they would have had to foul him once he got the offensive rebound anyway. That wasn't excessive contact. He went up strong and Wofford guy played great defense.
Coming from the guy that said he wanted the sec to burn from the porn lawyers tweet................ uh huh sure
Might be getting some of you duke fans confused but I know I saw posts upset at officials after that game from a duke fan or two
You want to single out the no call on the double dribble that was mid game, then turn around and only talk about the calls at the END of the Duke game because they favored Duke.
UCF was +17 with Tacko on the court. If he picks up his 4th like he should have on the horrendous no call with 9 something to go, then they likely aren’t in the scenario late.
You can’t pick and choose when middle of the game no call’s mean something. You also can’t choose how valuable a no call is to another no call. They all have the same impact.
So a no call double dribble means a lot, but a no foul on Tacko means nothing or not as much as the no call’s that went in Duke’s favor late game? That’s literally being biased.
They either all have the same effect (which they do, a no call is a no call, points are points, fouls are fouls), or we get into cherry picking and blaming the refs for only what we WANT to see.
So which is it.
Can you draw us a picture of this dream world you live in every day.......... im sure its a trip....
You are acting like the game was completely in UCF's favor up to that point when it wasnt........
Then why did he get 2 automatic free throws when you were in the bonus? Why wasn’t it a 1 and 1? Because the ref blew the whistle late and it was called a foul on the shot. You are literally trying to change what physically happened. Hilarious.
These are the first posts I've even mentioned it....... you act like i've been on a vendetta against that game since last night lol
Thats not what im saying.......... Im saying the whistle blew when he got the rebound....... meaning that no matter what.... he had the rebound and the wofford team would of had to of fouled him even if it was a no call. and it absolutely was NOT an offensive foul.
They called the foul...........which wasnt a foul...... but it was moot.... they would of had to foul him anyways.
You are acting like a no call has more meaning based on the time in the game..which is not true.
It’s been nearly 24 hours. Christ idc that you just mentioned it clearly it’s still in your head.
a no call in the final seconds of a game in a close game means winning and losing..
He got the offensive rebound because he lowered his elbow on the shot and bumped him out of the way.
I mentioned it because it was already being discussed by others...... I didnt start it.
A no call with 9:34 left in the game means running away with it or allowing the other time to stay in it.
So you WEREN’T suggesting that the double dribble could’ve been the difference between winning and losing? Yes you were. If you weren’t, you wouldn’t have singled out that play. Im pretty sure that was in the first half, too. Own it. You are being so biased because it’s Duke.
Pretty simple concept, really. LSU @ UK comes to mind.
Similar threads
