I’m not saying Izzo is the moral compass for all. I’m asking if it’s alright to hold an investigation, see if Izzo violates Title IX, covered anything up, or if what he did was sufficient. Then depending on that, should he be fired or “resign”.
I think that’s pretty fair. To sum it up, I see a difference between public perception/morals and criminal wrongdoing and firing/possible charges and such.
I feel like there is a middle ground and you don’t have to go to one extreme or the other. It’s quite possible it’s a gray area where this ain’t great morally but you didn’t violate Title IX or the law and that’s completely separate from Larry Nassar and/or LAKS and Mark Hollis. Those people aren’t on trial here, we’re talking about Izzo and Dantonio.
Do you see where I’m coming from? Because I can’t sit here and defend them entirely and say they’re 100% morally superior beings but I’m also not sitting here ready to take them down and shame their names.