ADVERTISEMENT

***Official 2019 B1G Off Season thread***

Who is the worst Purdue poster?

  • Pig1960

  • Proudopete

  • Joe for prez

  • JohnHoosierr

  • Graham Couch


Results are only viewable after voting.
For the first time? Okayyy
yes for the 1st time in Fran's 9 seasons. here is the break down of the 10 players
SR Jordan can play the 1 or the 2
SR Kriener can play the 3-4-5 but mainly plays the 5
RSJR Pemsl can play the 3-4-5 but plays mainly the 4
JR Garza can play the 4 or 5 [me I hope he plays the 4
RSSO Connor can play the 1-2 and the WG
RSSO Nunge has started at the 3 and the 5 but also can play the 4
SO Wieskamp can play the 2 and the 3
RSFR Fredrick can play the 1-2 and the WG
FR Patrick can play a point forward on the press 2-3-4 in other matchups
FR Toussaint is a 1 only, and is the only player on the roster that can play just 1 position.
 
You’re going to keep this up rather than being a normal poster? Don’t be the JohnHoosier of the Indiana fan base.
I'm not. I said I didn't think they have a backup 4 and gave reasons why I thought that. It's called a discussion.

Dont get pissy with me because you always think Michigan's backups can beat the rest of the big ten's starters.
 
Good call @ThreeTwaunMoore , definitely sounds like @NC_Trojan10
Not sure who that is, but went through his post history.... I can see the confusion as it looks like he is a pretty biased IU fan (admittedly I am too), but the Zach McRoberts is as good as Ryan Cline thing is even too much for me. I was very anti McRoberts getting on the court.
 
I'm not. I said I didn't think they have a backup 4 and gave reasons why I thought that. It's called a discussion.

Dont get pissy with me because you always think Michigan's backups can beat the rest of the big ten's starters.

Lying about what I said is very JohnHoosier of you. Is that really your goal? Be better than that.
 
Not sure who that is
giphy.gif
 
What did you say that was along those lines then? Was it not every team that Michigan's backups could beat?

I said that if Moe Wagner returned our bench could be better than some bottom end starting 5s because Teske and Livers or Brazdeikas would both be coming off the bench.

I didn’t say the bench after Wagner left could beat every starting 5.


The difference in those two takes is bigger than the difference between Sasha and Cline.
 
Yup. Remembers my discussion about Michigan’s bench but has never read NC_Trojan’s posts? That’s not even a lie my 5 year old niece would try to slip by.
So... you admit you said it...

2. I do remember the posts as I went through his history a little bit ago after being accused of being him (or her).
 
So... you admit you said it...

2. I do remember the posts as I went through his history a little bit ago after being accused of being him (or her).

No one ever said Michigan’s bench could beat all or most of the conference starters.

Did your old account get banned? You really should honor the bet you lost at least.
 
No one ever said Michigan’s bench could beat all or most of the conference starters.

Did your old account get banned? You really should honor the bet you lost at least.
I dont have an old account. You can read this board without having an account. This is not a premium board. When reading the Trojan guy's posts though, I noticed you made him have a picture of Jim Beilein. I'm assuming that's what you are referring to. Is that really the picture you had him choose? Was that the bet to begin with, or did you get to choose any picture you wanted?
 
I dont have an old account. You can read this board without having an account. This is not a premium board. When reading the Trojan guy's posts though, I noticed you made him have a picture of Jim Beilein. I'm assuming that's what you are referring to. Is that really the picture you had him choose? Was that the bet to begin with, or did you get to choose any picture you wanted?

Oh you’re not Trojan? Why didn’t you just say so!
 
It’s one of your own that’s calls himself the the B1G fan if I had to guess

1, This dude posts identical to the way NC use to post.

2. NC came around out of nowhere and posted for a year and then disappeared April 7th.

3. This dude started posting April 7th.

4. NC had the generic Rivals logo as his avatar until he lost the bet to me. Looks familiar.



Not sure how anyone could think it’s more likely to be a Purdue fan than NC.
 
1, This dude posts identical to the way NC use to post.

2. NC came around out of nowhere and posted for a year and then disappeared April 7th.

3. This dude started posting April 7th.

4. NC had the generic Rivals logo as his avatar until he lost the bet to me. Looks familiar.



Not sure how anyone could think it’s more likely to be a Purdue fan than NC.
The Trojan guy's last post was Feb 10th.
 
What bet did he lose?

The shit show starts here:

https://forums.rivals.com/threads/5...ost-intrigued-by.843815/page-11#post-26015248



Short story:

@NC_Trojan10 signed up last summer. I offered a bet to Indiana fans that Michigan would finish higher in conference play because he was trolling. He says he will take the bet and wants it to be a 1 year ban bet. I tell him that’s not a fair bet because no one knows who he is and he never posts here. He goes on for pages about how I must be scared because I wont take a ban bet with his troll account.

I come up with the idea that we do a 1,000 post avatar bet. Loser has to keep the winners avatar choice for their next 1,000 posts. That way simply not posting for a certain amount a time couldn’t get someone out of it.


He accepts, loses, and then stops posting February 11th. His last login is April 7th and this poster starts posting April 7th.
 
The shit show starts here:

https://forums.rivals.com/threads/5...ost-intrigued-by.843815/page-11#post-26015248



Short story:

@NC_Trojan10 signed up last summer. I offered a bet to Indiana fans that Michigan would finish higher in conference play because he was trolling. He says he will take the bet and wants it to be a 1 year ban bet. I tell him that’s not a fair bet because no one knows who he is and he never posts here. He goes on for pages about how I must be scared because I wont take a ban bet with his troll account.

I come up with the idea that we do a 1,000 post avatar bet. Loser has to keep the winners avatar choice for their next 1,000 posts. That way simply not posting for a certain amount a time couldn’t get someone out of it.


He accepts, loses, and then stops posting February 11th. His last login is April 7th and this poster starts posting April 7th.

I don’t see somebody creating a new account because of an avatar, but if it is him, he’s gay af.
 
The shit show starts here:

https://forums.rivals.com/threads/5...ost-intrigued-by.843815/page-11#post-26015248



Short story:

@NC_Trojan10 signed up last summer. I offered a bet to Indiana fans that Michigan would finish higher in conference play because he was trolling. He says he will take the bet and wants it to be a 1 year ban bet. I tell him that’s not a fair bet because no one knows who he is and he never posts here. He goes on for pages about how I must be scared because I wont take a ban bet with his troll account.

I come up with the idea that we do a 1,000 post avatar bet. Loser has to keep the winners avatar choice for their next 1,000 posts. That way simply not posting for a certain amount a time couldn’t get someone out of it.


He accepts, loses, and then stops posting February 11th. His last login is April 7th and this poster starts posting April 7th.
Your argument is that I started posting the same day a random IU rivals member stopped posting?
 
I don’t see somebody creating a new account because of an avatar, but if it is him, he’s gay af.

I think it’s more because he spent all offseason last year talking about how bad Purdue would be. Then Indiana sucked while Purdue was good.

So rather than doing it again under the same account and Purdue fans being able to show him how wrong he was last year he makes a new account and immediately comes in to talk about how bad Purdue’s roster is.


And yes that’s but still gay af.
 
ADVERTISEMENT