Not at all, but with the Purdue fans calling people pussies over not taking bets I figured I'd offer one that should look good for a Purdue fan.
***Official 2019 B1G Off Season thread***
- Thread starter bMORE607
- Start date
Not at all, but with the Purdue fans calling people pussies over not taking bets I figured I'd offer one that should look good for a Purdue fan.
Even though I'm siding with someone you don't like, I thought I was being civil. Why jump to this?
pig1960: 38% seems likely
SNU: I disagree.
pig1960: Okay then bet me, 37.001% or higher and I win.
SNU: You said 38%
Purdue posters: You're not man enough to admit you misunderstood him.
SNU: I disagree.
pig1960: Okay then bet me, 37.001% or higher and I win.
SNU: You said 38%
Purdue posters: You're not man enough to admit you misunderstood him.
Because I've trolled before every civil conservation has to turn into shit-posting and talking about posters fvcking eachother?
You guys talk about how you don't claim JohnHoosier and then do JohnHoosier type things.
I’d make him donate to a pro-LGBTQ+ group too and watch him welch like the piece of shit he is.
You don’t do yourselves any favors with your consistent schtick on here. 95% of your posts are trolling garbage, don’t get butthurt when people won’t take you serious.
For a guy that uses snowflake and cuck as often as you, you sure get sensitive when I make fun of your white knighting for snu.
My feelings aren't hurt. I'm just saying that if non-trolling posts are what you guys would prefer from me then don't turn my non-trolling posts into the same old back and forth shit-posting.
Again, it doesn't bother me personally. If you and I never had a serious conversation again I wouldn't care. There are other good Purdue posters here that do/will. If you'd rather take the JohnHoosier route then that's your prerogative.
He said:
"I don’t think it’s a stretch to think 38% is likely. May not happen but I’d make a friendly wager on it."
You take that as him saying 37% is likely?
These last few pages are truly the epitome of what the offseason thread is.
Iu/Purdue shitposting, hail jumping in randomly, Gil was apparently a racist cop, bet propositions that are never taken, multiple insults thrown every which way.
Way to go out with a bang boys.
Iu/Purdue shitposting, hail jumping in randomly, Gil was apparently a racist cop, bet propositions that are never taken, multiple insults thrown every which way.
Way to go out with a bang boys.
So if you said you'd be happy with 4th and would expect 5th and someone wanted to bet you straight up on 4th, you'd take that bet straight up? I think not.
funny how so many are making a big deal out of the players that left. the 1st is
6'6 Daily 12.5 mpg, 2.5 ppg not a big loss as he transferred to Akron
6'7 Baer a very good former walk on 19.1 mpg, 6.7 ppg his replacement is 6'8 4* top 100 Patrick
6'5 Moss 24.1 mpg 9.2 ppg replacement will be Evelyn and Fredrick looks like a = trade
6'9 Cook 31 mpg, 14.5 ppg, 7.6 rpg, 0.7 bpg not exactly the dominating number from the most Athletic player, shooting 51% from the field 0% from 3 AND just 64.4 % from the FTL he led the team in attempts and made FTL, the bad he led the team in TO's with 92.
these numbers can and will be improved on 7'0 RSSO Nunge as a FR had 25 blocks, shooting 75.6% from the FTL, 33.9% from 3 and 30 TO's in 30 games, was the 5th leading scorer as a FR
6'8 RSJR Pemsl as a FR was 3rd on the team in scoring at 9.0 ppg, 4.7 rpg shooting 63.1 % from the field
these 2 will be more than enough to replace Cook and both were starters before this season.
Both can rebound, score and block shots.
6'6 Daily 12.5 mpg, 2.5 ppg not a big loss as he transferred to Akron
6'7 Baer a very good former walk on 19.1 mpg, 6.7 ppg his replacement is 6'8 4* top 100 Patrick
6'5 Moss 24.1 mpg 9.2 ppg replacement will be Evelyn and Fredrick looks like a = trade
6'9 Cook 31 mpg, 14.5 ppg, 7.6 rpg, 0.7 bpg not exactly the dominating number from the most Athletic player, shooting 51% from the field 0% from 3 AND just 64.4 % from the FTL he led the team in attempts and made FTL, the bad he led the team in TO's with 92.
these numbers can and will be improved on 7'0 RSSO Nunge as a FR had 25 blocks, shooting 75.6% from the FTL, 33.9% from 3 and 30 TO's in 30 games, was the 5th leading scorer as a FR
6'8 RSJR Pemsl as a FR was 3rd on the team in scoring at 9.0 ppg, 4.7 rpg shooting 63.1 % from the field
these 2 will be more than enough to replace Cook and both were starters before this season.
Both can rebound, score and block shots.
They’re such a sensitive bunch. They act like they’re all different but in reality they’re exactly the same as Johhoosier.
But that's not what happened.
He said:
"I'd be happy with 38%"
"I don’t think it’s a stretch to think 38% is likely. May not happen but I’d make a friendly wager on it."
Then he offered the bet of 37.001% or higher being a win for him.
Plus I never said a word about the 37%. I questioned his comment on 38% or higher. I mean, this isn’t rocket science. It’s just a weird hill to die on just to try and oppose anything that I say.
HailToCivility preaching the high road when made fun while constantly trolling and white knighting for a stalker. Thanks for the lessons sir.
Let me clarify:
"I'd be happy with 38%"
Meaning - He'd be happy with 38%
"I don’t think it’s a stretch to think 38% is likely."
Meaning - If someone said 38%, he doesn't think it's unrealistic
"May not happen but I’d make a friendly wager on it. Over/Under 37% seems fair."
Meaning - The wager relates to his expectation, which is the sentence that follows. It's interesting that you skipped the last sentence as it seems to contradict your position.
Everyone, please consider donating to the SNU/Hail wedding fund. All proceeds will go to wedding expenses, a whip for SNU & a leash for Hail.
https://www.gofundme.com/f/snu-amp-hail-wedding
Honest question. Do you Purdue fans think people actually care if you like me or us? You’re on a internet message board. You don’t know me. You’ll never meet me. You have no impact on my life other than to provide entertainment in how idiotic you all are as a collective group.
Wrong. The whole conversation hinges on the 38%. I didn't question the 37%. Jesus don’t be a f’ing idiot.
It boils down to us disagreeing what he implied.
"I'd be happy with 38%"
"I don't think it's a stretch to think 38% is likely."
Meaning: I think 38% is likely and don't think it's a stretch.
The only thing we can conclude is that pig1960 sucks at actually stating what he thinks is likely.
@pig1960 what do YOU think is Purdue's likely 3pt %?
Last edited:
Aside from special cases I think doxxing is really lame, but I think there is a difference between doxxing and stalking. He doxxed you when you didn't deserve it but I don't think he actively stalks you.
It’s his trademark. Bottom line is they are both liars and trolls.
They both conveniently leave out the part where I actually offered the bet set at 37.
I knew better than to engage the shithead twins. I wouldn’t take the bet at 35 now.
What’s funny about this is I’m ripping you two bc you clearly yearn for each other’s approval.
Thanks for more lessons in civility. Must be lonely on the high road.
Where did I say anything about 37%? You know you got call out and are too big of a pussy to take a bet. Standard Purdue douchebag.
Will you take my bet?
I don't think not taking it makes you a coward but will you take it?
Do the Purdue fans who always side with eachother here yearn for eachothers approval?
Yeah. I do. MSU, Maryland, and I would give it a high likelihood one of Purdue, Michigan, OSU, Illinois makes it.