Do ya think the B1G will land 3 teams in the S16?
I don't think it's a stretch to think it's likely that 3 B1G teams make the S16.
Do ya think the B1G will land 3 teams in the S16?
So what you are saying is there are two possible interpretations of what he implied, which I agree. It was only after he clarified his position that I concluded that my interpretation was the correct one.It boils down to us disagreeing what he implied.
"I'd be happy with 38%"
"I don't think it's a stretch to think 38% is likely."
Meaning: I think 38% is likely and don't think it's a stretch.
The only thing we can conclude is that pig1960 sucks at actually stating what he thinks is likely.
@pig1960 what do YOU think is Purdue's likely 3pt %?
I'm not interested in your bet. I never talked about Purdue vs. Michigan making the FF. SNU is adamant IU returns better shooters and he has the stats to back them up. So he is a coward for boasting about IU's returning 3 point shooting and how it will better than Purdue's, yet won't take a bet that IU shoots a better percentage from 3 this year.Will you take my bet?
I don't think not taking it makes you a coward but will you take it?
What does Pig have anything to do with you bragging about IU's returning shooting prowess and how statistically its better than Purdue? Put your money where your mouth is.I’ll take yours when @pig1960 takes mine. Simple really.
So what you are saying is there are two possible interpretations of what he implied, which I agree. It was only after he clarified his position that I concluded that my interpretation was the correct one.
Thanks for at least acknowledging the possibility. That's more than Snu is willing to do.
I'm not interested in your bet. I never talked about Purdue vs. Michigan making the FF. SNU is adamant IU returns better shooters and he has the stats to back them up. So he is a coward for boasting about IU's returning 3 point shooting and how it will better than Purdue's, yet won't take a bet that IU shoots a better percentage from 3 this year.
Liar. Where did I “brag” about our shooting prowess? I’ve simply maintained that your stance is dumb as shit. You’re sold on your guys as shooters and down on ours even though your guys have a worse percentage on lower volume.What does Pig have anything to do with you bragging about IU's returning shooting prowess and how statistically its better than Purdue? Put your money where your mouth is.
Pig was boasting about your guys shooting over 38% from 3 this year and then tried to give himself an extra percent on the bet. He’s a coward and won’t put his money where his mouth is.I'm not interested in your bet. I never talked about Purdue vs. Michigan making the FF. SNU is adamant IU returns better shooters and he has the stats to back them up. So he is a coward for boasting about IU's returning 3 point shooting and how it will better than Purdue's, yet won't take a bet that IU shoots a better percentage from 3 this year.
Take the bet. It's clear IU returns better shooters. This is slam dunk win for you.Liar. Where did I “brag” about our shooting prowess? I’ve simply maintained that your stance is dumb as shit. You’re sold on your guys as shooters and down on ours even though your guys have a worse percentage on lower volume.
I don't give a shit. That has nothing to do with the bet I proposed to you.Pig was boasting about your guys shooting over 38% from 3 this year and then tried to give himself an extra percent on the bet. He’s a coward and won’t put his money where his mouth is.
That's possible. Another instance of it being open to interpretation.I don't think him offering the bet on 37% clarified his position, though. I read that as him still thinking 38% is likely but giving himself an extra % on the bet. Which is where the confusion comes in.
It is clear, statistically. Get @pig1960 to take my bet at 38% and I’ll take yours. Time for you girls to put up or shut up.Take the bet. It's clear IU returns better shooters. This is slam dunk win for you.
That's possible. Another instance of it being open to interpretation.
There is a reason why I tell me team to have a conversation rather than Email a 3rd party if a subject is important. Too many opportunities to misconstrue intent or tone.
It's also why I tend to take people at their word when they try to clarify intent.
I’m not here to defend pig, et al, but I’ll set the yearning for approval bar at whether or not one has tried to defend the honor of another message board poster by making the very sad attempt at claiming that you both definitely have sex and are super good at it.Do the Purdue fans who always side with eachother here yearn for eachothers approval?
When you give your wife good sex they tend not to care about what extent your internet trolling goes.
Everyone, please consider donating to the SNU/Hail wedding fund. All proceeds will go to wedding expenses, a whip for SNU & a leash for Hail.
https://www.gofundme.com/f/snu-amp-hail-wedding
I’m not here to defend pig, et al, but I’ll set the yearning for approval bar at whether or not one has tried to defend the honor of another message board poster by making the very sad attempt at claiming that you both definitely have sex and are super good at it.
it is clear so why won't you take the be?It is clear, statistically. Get @pig1960 to take my bet at 38% and I’ll take yours. Time for you girls to put up or shut up.
Sorry little buddy, but that’s exactly what happened.I wasn’t referring to SNU with that post. Now that that’s cleared up what’s the new bar for yearning for approval?
Love you trying to play this down like it’s normal behavior. You inform your wife and buddies that you obtained pictures of my family in response to me laughing about your McBob takes?
When you give your wife good sex they tend not to care about what extent your internet trolling goes.
Sorry little buddy, but that’s exactly what happened.
No, I was referring to myself. I read your post and thought about how my wife knows I troll on here and doesn’t care and used it as an opportunity to humble brag about sex.
He’s saving himself for your guys’ honeymoon.Is SNU even married? I don’t think he is.
Yikes
He’s saving himself for your guys’ honeymoon.
Yes married with two kids.Is SNU even married? I don’t think he is.
Don’t project your gay fantasies onto me.He’s saving himself for your guys’ honeymoon.
My favorite long con on this board.Yes married with two kids.
Yeah, I don’t care if you don’t believe me random internet message board guy.My favorite long con on this board.
Yes. Precisely. I don’t believe you, the random gay internet message board guy. Thanks for clearing that up.Yeah, I don’t care if you don’t believe random gay internet message board guy.
I realize heterosexual relationships scare you but fear not, my friend.
This is probably the best time to close this thread.
Classic. I will have to use “random gay internet message board guy” whenever I refer to the resident troll couple.Yes. Precisely. I don’t believe you, the random gay internet message board guy. Thanks for clearing that up.
Classic. I will have to use “random gay internet message board guy” whenever I refer to the resident troll couple.
We (the brewery) technically can't legally. I never have personally.Do you ship beer
We (the brewery) technically can't legally. I never have personally.
We are bottling currently and are switching to cans around mid-December. I'd feel more comfortable shipping cans.
I was specifically talking about hoarding pictures of my brother and you hopped in. Hard to interpret that any other way, but your justification doesn’t help your cause lolNo, I was referring to myself. I read your post and thought about how my wife knows I troll on here and doesn’t care and used it as an opportunity to humble brag about sex.