I don't think it's a stretch to think it's likely that 3 B1G teams make the S16.
***Official 2019 B1G Off Season thread***
- Thread starter bMORE607
- Start date
I don't think it's a stretch to think it's likely that 3 B1G teams make the S16.
So what you are saying is there are two possible interpretations of what he implied, which I agree. It was only after he clarified his position that I concluded that my interpretation was the correct one.
Thanks for at least acknowledging the possibility. That's more than Snu is willing to do.
I'm not interested in your bet. I never talked about Purdue vs. Michigan making the FF. SNU is adamant IU returns better shooters and he has the stats to back them up. So he is a coward for boasting about IU's returning 3 point shooting and how it will better than Purdue's, yet won't take a bet that IU shoots a better percentage from 3 this year.
What does Pig have anything to do with you bragging about IU's returning shooting prowess and how statistically its better than Purdue? Put your money where your mouth is.
I don't think him offering the bet on 37% clarified his position, though. I read that as him still thinking 38% is likely but giving himself an extra % on the bet. Which is where the confusion comes in.
Oh, okay. I don't read most of the posts about Indiana vs Purdue 3pt shooting.
Liar. Where did I “brag” about our shooting prowess? I’ve simply maintained that your stance is dumb as shit. You’re sold on your guys as shooters and down on ours even though your guys have a worse percentage on lower volume.
Pig was boasting about your guys shooting over 38% from 3 this year and then tried to give himself an extra percent on the bet. He’s a coward and won’t put his money where his mouth is.
Take the bet. It's clear IU returns better shooters. This is slam dunk win for you.
I don't give a shit. That has nothing to do with the bet I proposed to you.
That's possible. Another instance of it being open to interpretation.
There is a reason why I tell me team to have a conversation rather than Email a 3rd party if a subject is important. Too many opportunities to misconstrue intent or tone.
It's also why I tend to take people at their word when they try to clarify intent.
It is clear, statistically. Get @pig1960 to take my bet at 38% and I’ll take yours. Time for you girls to put up or shut up.
I’m not here to defend pig, et al, but I’ll set the yearning for approval bar at whether or not one has tried to defend the honor of another message board poster by making the very sad attempt at claiming that you both definitely have sex and are super good at it.
I wasn’t referring to SNU with that post. Now that that’s cleared up what’s the new bar for yearning for approval?
Sorry little buddy, but that’s exactly what happened.
No, I was referring to myself. I read your post and thought about how my wife knows I troll on here and doesn’t care and used it as an opportunity to humble brag about sex.
If we get donations do I get the money? If so make sure you spread that link around.
This is probably the best time to close this thread.
Yes. Precisely. I don’t believe you, the random gay internet message board guy. Thanks for clearing that up.
Classic. I will have to use “random gay internet message board guy” whenever I refer to the resident troll couple.
We (the brewery) technically can't legally. I never have personally.
We are bottling currently and are switching to cans around mid-December. I'd feel more comfortable shipping cans.
I was specifically talking about hoarding pictures of my brother and you hopped in. Hard to interpret that any other way, but your justification doesn’t help your cause lol