That's not what I said. I said Langford was just fine. Never said scoring 13 on 15 shots was fine.
Read better.
Why are you being a dick over this?
That's not what I said. I said Langford was just fine. Never said scoring 13 on 15 shots was fine.
Read better.
That's not what I said. I said Langford was just fine. Never said scoring 13 on 15 shots was fine.
Read better.
Not being a dick. You misquote me all the time.Why are you being a dick over this?
Not being a dick. You misquote me all the time.
And many would say that "Langford looked just fine", would be saying, "even though his shot wasn't falling, he still looked good offensively". And he did. Making shots is part of it. Not all of it. He got to the rim. He got in the lane. He got good looks. They(shots) just didn't drop. If he had been totally "locked up", and unable to get to the rim, or in the lane, then my feelings would be different.You seem incapable of having a legitimate conversation without getting defensive and rude.
Many would say that “Langford looked just fine” would be calling his scoring night “fine” and that has nothing to do with how good or bad a person reads.
Not really. Since I had already acknowledge he had an off night. Seems to me that would be a dead give away I didn't think he was that efficient.Read my above post. You don’t see how that can come across as the same thing? Maybe that’s not what you meant but to sayc anyone who misunderstood you needs to read better is being a dick.
Who do you think is having the better season?
Player A
15.7 pts 5.8 rebs 1.2 assists
29.6 PER
.626 True Shooting %
126.0 Offensive Rating on 28.5 usage
12.2 Box +/-
Player B
17.7 pts 5.9 rebs 2.4 assists
20.4 PER
.546 True Shooting %
111.0 offensive rating on 26.8 usage
6.1 Box +/-