Lol Delk was a much better player but Lamb shot 47.5% from deep over 2 years. Delk was at 39.5%. That's a gigantic difference.
It ain't a stretch. He won everything he could at UK and has become a superstar in the pros. The white dudes that are legends wouldn't score a point on AD.
Reading comprehension bad. I didn't compare him to anyone, just said he was a good point guard and a first round pick.
See above. I didn't say it was UK's greatest team. But it was a damn good one. Lol at thinking the 98 cats were better. Same with 2010. They didn't even make the final four.
So in your mind, you have to make the FF to be thought of as a great team? 2015 came within a whisker of missing the FF, Notre Dame had them by the throat.
2019 Duke didn’t make the FF, but if you listen to Jay Bilas, they were, hands down, the greatest team of the modern era.
UK2010 is one of the best teams ever at UK. They were a better team than 2012, but since 12 had AD and won the title, people like you automatically rank them higher.
You appear to be disagreeing with me when I say I would take Delk over Lamb, but you admitted Delk was a better player. So, what's the issue there?
Would you take Lamb over Booker, Monk, Meeks, Shep, Delk, Murray or maybe Tyler Herro? I wouldn't.
In fact, the only guy on that 12 team that would be taken first over any other previous UK player was AD and he only scored 6 total points. So KU did a good job of taking him out.
As far as AD not allowing "the white dudes that are legends" to score a point, is funny, you act like nobody ever made a shot against UK2012 because AD was on the team. AD wasn’t guarding 1's and 2's out on the perimeter. Strange take man.
Everyone has their opinions and that’s all this is.