Trump
- Thread starter JimboBBN
- Start date
Sounds like incest wasn't a big deal in your family. That's your business, Phil.
Can you not see anything wrong with what Trump said about his daughter? I mean, I find it creepy and weird to say that about your own daughter. The people who bring it up, though, are the same ones who don't find it creepy and weird that Joe Biden has said and done some extremely inappropriate things to little girls. And there's dozens of videos that show it.
No, I dont.
Unless you have the entire conversation/transcript we have no idea of the context.
He is a proud father with a beautiful daughter.
Funny, how none of this stuff was ever made public until he ran as a Republican.
Liberals are the worst, most hypocritical people on this planet.
Any accusations by Ivanka of Trump showering with her.
Nope, nothing. Just a loving father.
When Donald Trump was watching his 16-year-old daughter Ivanka host the 1997 Miss Teen USA pageant, he turned to the then-Miss Universe and asked: “Don’t you think my daughter’s hot? She’s hot, right?”
In the almost 20 years since, Mr. Trump has called his eldest daughter “voluptuous”. He’s said it’s OK to describe her as “a piece of ass”, though she is a senior executive in his business empire.
On The Howard Stern Show, 2003
Donald Trump bragged about his then-22-year-old daughter’s body, saying: “You know who’s one of the great beauties of the world, according to everybody? And I helped create her. Ivanka.
“My daughter, Ivanka. She’s 6 feet tall, she’s got the best body. She made a lot money as a model—a tremendous amount.”
On The Howard Stern Show, October 2006
Stern remarks that Ivanka “looks more voluptuous than ever”, and asked if she has received breast implants. Trump engages in the discussion, saying she has not.
“She's actually always been very voluptuous,” Trump responds. “She's tall, she's almost 6 feet tall and she's been, she's an amazing beauty.”
Rolling Stone interview, September 2015
“After I met Ivanka and praised her to her father, he said, ‘Yeah, she's really something, and what a beauty, that one. If I weren't happily married and, ya know, her father . . .’”
**** you. Typical sick twisted liberal accusing others of what they do.
Too bad you werent in the NC mountains over the weekend.
Would you've tried to seduce me with your family?
Last edited:
If you're not butthurt about something, you're not liberal.
What the fvck is wrong with you? Me personally, I wish the people in the mountains weren't going through what they are and will be for a long time. You? You just wish a message board foe was there. And you're talking about sick and twisted people.
This one is even better. Has to be a joke, right?
Imagine how gullible someone would have to be to think she actually intends to secure the border.
Dear God.
Dear God.
Thoughts from the VP debate:
1) Vance is very polished as a speaker
2) Walz is definitely not as polished but did better than I thought he would
3) Hilarious how the MSM CBS wonks said they wouldn't fact check and then when they did (not shocking), Vance put them in their place
4) Overall, I'd say Vance won the debate tho not by as big a margin as I would have expected
5) I doubt the debate had much impact on the 5% that are still on the fence about who to vote for
1) Vance is very polished as a speaker
2) Walz is definitely not as polished but did better than I thought he would
3) Hilarious how the MSM CBS wonks said they wouldn't fact check and then when they did (not shocking), Vance put them in their place
4) Overall, I'd say Vance won the debate tho not by as big a margin as I would have expected
5) I doubt the debate had much impact on the 5% that are still on the fence about who to vote for
I thought it was an old school type debate where two people had different visions, but showed respect to one another and acknowledged common ground. I really thought that was dead in American politics. I think the "JD Vance is weird" narrative took a big hit last night.
I keep reading articles about Texas being a potential tipping point in the election. That state isn’t ever going blue. Waste of breath.
Death, taxes and the left claiming they have hope in Texas. Latinos in Texas are even turning their backs on the dems.
The VP candidates were very respectful and adultlike while addressing key issues, yet the Presidential candidates just argue and throw shade like 5-year-olds while talking about nothing of substance. Never thought I would confuse a presidential debate with a Jerry Springer episode.
It isn't that far-fetched, especially with Californians flocking there and illegals voting. Trump only won Texas 52.1% to 46.5% in 2020, and that was before the California/PacNW mass exodus started. He won most southern states like Alabama, Arkansas, and Mississippi by waaaaaaaaaay more than that.
I had to laugh when the moderator said the candidates did not have prior access to the questions before the debate. Almost every answer by both candidates was down to the second on the 2-minute allotment (I timed them) and were obviously well rehearsed. Also, you don't just pull random stats and quotes out of your ass without prior preparation unless you're Rain Man. Many of the questions were obvious and to be expected, but every single question asked they had obviously prepped for. Otherwise you would expect a pause to collect thoughts before responding. There was none of that.
It was refreshing and kinda brought me back to how things used to be.
Yep----Actually makes you dislike Trump/Harris even more---I mean why cant the two people battling for PTOUS, be like this?
Thats like reading articles wbout the Cowboys winning the SB...
Waste of breath as well...
The cool thing about that ‘lost money’ is it’s not lost. The negotiation process with telecom companies took a bit longer than expected but the broadband rollout was never intended to be implemented immediately. It’s a 10 year plan.
This is something worth keeping an eye on because, if Trump wins, it could speak to the problem with Presidents getting credit and blame for everything that happens during their time in office. It’s too nuanced for some. The first broadband expansion is anticipated to occur in 2025 and has been for some time. If Trump wins and that expansion goes ahead as planned, it will be a feather in his cap for something he had no part in. But anybody who points that out would be labeled a hater who just doesn’t want to give him credit.
Fair points. I will say that the fella in the tweet makes a good point even with the outcome you have laid out. There is a zero percent chance that none of that $42 billion ends up in waste. So the point still remains about not caring about him losing his own money. On the flip side, there is zero percent chance that any bill that Trump passes or passed, would end up with no waste. So he is also losing tax payer's money.
Good God. Tiktok is a cancer, trump was right. But imagine believing this video is real.
Hey man, you know how those crazy woke gay libs are with their crazy ideals, like women deserving the right to govern their own bodies and wanting wealthy elites to pay some taxes some of the time.
They’ll do anything!
The people who think that taxing the rich more would do anything to lift up the poor are some of the dumbest creatures to roam the earth.
Abortion is one of those things I wish Republicans would give some leverage on. All life matters, including women who might die trying to give birth. I think it’s a horrible cop out more times than not to fix lazy mistakes, but it’s needed in some instances to ensure that people who are alive stay that way.
