Now double that and our programs will be equal.The last tourney game coached by Bill Self:
The last tourney game coached by Johnny Calipari:
Does this make you lil bro of lil bro?
Now double that and our programs will be equal.The last tourney game coached by Bill Self:
The last tourney game coached by Johnny Calipari:
Does this make you lil bro of lil bro?
Now double that and our programs will be equal.
^^Nope. Timeframed.
UK’s unknowns. I’m good with it. We both won the same number of championships last year.
"last quarter century" was all I needed to see.Did you happen to notice what I was responding to? Where were you on this one? 🤣
"last quarter century" was all I needed to see.
UK fans have no need to timeframe. Especially with fictitious bird fans.So your "no timeframing" rules don't apply to UK fans. Got it. Well, you can go ahead and spare me of it too.
UK fans have no need to timeframe. Especially with fictitious bird fans.
24-11
8-4.
Don't care what they do. When you do it, you get the truth hammer.Actually, they timeframe all the time. Like the example I just gave you. 😆
Do your 40s titles help you cope with the midmajor-level success in recent years?
Don't care what they do. When you do it, you get the truth hammer.
24-11.
8-4.
^^^just more noise that fans of teams without more titles say. Yaaaawwwwn.
That guys needs a tampon^^^just more noise that fans of teams without more titles say. Yaaaawwwwn.
There's nothing to ponder. the #'s are what they are.
24-11.
8-4.
This is the reality. It's time that you get a grip on it.
Should @dukedevilz adjust his 50 greatest programs thread to only include KU stats for the last 40 years?
KU was a good program prior to that. I'm not sure why ppl dismiss it.
Which are you proud of? A "sample" (your word), or all time?No, he should just add a modern era ranking.
Oh wait…he did. 😁
Off-season champs. KU fans really have become the new UK fans.The Athletic released their preseason top 25. How can Kentucky be ranked 15 spots below a team that lost a preseason exhibition game? Has to be a mistake.
1
Kansas
There are question marks about KU’s shooting, but the offense is going to be elite because of its passing ability. Opposing coaches are going to tear their hair out trying to figure out what to do in pick-and-roll coverage. Dajuan Harris Jr. is one of the best at making the pocket pass to the short roll, and both KJ Adams and Hunter Dickinson make quick decisions in that action.
Kevin McCullar Jr. is also a capable passer and a really good cutter. The group already looked to have great chemistry in August. And it’s August! Bill Self is going to have a blast figuring out ways to get Adams and Dickinson in advantage situations. He also has new ways to use Harris because he has other players capable of bringing the ball up, which will also save Harris’s legs. Self has also upgraded his bench. Kansas has seven guys who would start just about anywhere with Arterio Morris, Elmarko Jackson and Nick Timberlake battling for the fifth starter spot and the other two as the first off the bench. (New Aussie addition Johnny Furphy is also super interesting and gives Self some more lineup flexibility.)
We haven’t even mentioned the defense, which has two of the best perimeter defenders in the country (McCullar and Harris), and Self upgraded the team speed and positional length. And if you are wary of Dickinson being a part of an elite defense, go take a gander at Michigan’s numbers his freshman season, as well as the fact that Michigan had the second-best defense in the Big Ten during conference play last season. He’s surrounded by elite talent again, and it’s hard to see him failing in a system that’s designed to utilize his gifts.
16
Kentucky
A pivotal season forthcoming for John Calipari. The Wildcats have a ton of talent, including a potential top-five pick in Justin Edwards, potential first-rounders in D.J. Wagner and Aaron Bradshaw, plus a bit of experience in seniors Antonio Reeves and Tre Mitchell.
Reeves and Mitchell, particularly, seem key to something that we saw from Kentucky during its GLOBL JAM win in Kentucky during the offseason. Calipari seems poised to play a more modern style of offense, with better floor spacing and a willingness to fire from 3. Reeves will be one of the best shooters in college hoops this season, a consistent sniper who hit 40 percent of his 200-plus attempts last season. For his part, Mitchell let it fly nearly five times per game from distance in the trip north of the border and has real potential as a physical, rebounding, floor-spacing four.
But ultimately, a lot of this will come down to how the freshmen perform. We have full faith in Edwards to be the best player on the team. But the rest of the roster comes with questions. Can Wagner consistently run the show and get the Wildcats efficient looks? He’s an aggressive shot-hunter and brings real tenacity on defense, but his decision-making could be questionable in high school (as could his shooting efficiency outside of 15 feet). Bradshaw has a ton of tools, but his production has never matched his inherent talent level, and he’s coming off of an offseason foot injury. Onyenso is also coming off an offseason foot injury, leaving the Wildcats so thin up front that they had to go get Croatian big Zvonimir Ivisic late in the summer.
Which are you proud of? A "sample" (your word), or all time?
I feel like you wouldn't even post before you were born.
I can't speak for others, but over the years, I've watched all those games others have recorded to properly understand our history.I feel like most Kentucky fans have never watched a game from the 40s or 50s. Yet a lot of the same fans have watched and re-watched (maybe many times) big games from the modern era. Why do you think that is?
I love the whole history of basketball, but I'm a fan.
Proof.Yale football fans surely love their entire history too. But do you think an Alabama fan feels inferior for having fewer all-time titles? 😆
Honestly, I don't think the KU fanbase bothered with record old games so young guns could watch the past.
No offense, but you're proof KU fans only care about the here and now despite the rich tradition of KU basketball.
What's your thoughts on Ted Owens?KU fans talk about tradition as much as any and know as much about it as any. One can put a little more focus and emphasis on this era without losing appreciation for the rest.
"Modern era" is a common phrase in b-ball circles. As you know, Devilz even took the time to make a modern era ranking. KU fans will discuss the modern era and all-time. Kentucky fans will only discuss all-time (JC even threw a tantrum because Devilz had the audacity to make a modern era ranking 😂🤣 ).
Why can't both be discussed? What are Kentucky fans threatened by?
Btw, I seem to remember that you used to post stats like "most tourney wins since 2010" or some such thing. Does it just come down to whatever fits the argument? Are you guys the arbiters of what's acceptable to discuss that week?
I don't recall that. I'm guessing Calipari era?Btw, I seem to remember that you used to post stats like "most tourney wins since 2010" or some such thing. Does it just come down to whatever fits the argument? Are you guys the arbiters of what's acceptable to discuss that week?
I don't recall that. I'm guessing Calipari era?
Also, I don't mind ppl talking eras, but when folks dismiss eras, especially when they hang..nvm, but when folks dismiss decades as "grandpas" etc, the argument loses credibility.
Modern era/time frames is a crutch.
It's telling when folks use "since I've been alive'. I'm sure you understand.
Imagine a UConn 25-year-old using the same argument and saying we both suck and they are the best they've had more titles than KU has in their history.
It's convenient.
Exactly.Some of us are consistent. Some aren't.
Fwiw, I haven’t rewatched a game from any era. Once is enough for me.I feel like most Kentucky fans have never watched a game from the 40s or 50s, even though they can be found on Youtube. Yet a lot of the same fans have watched and re-watched (maybe many times) big games from the modern era. Why do you think that is?
I haven’t watched the games from decades ago, but I know most of the names just because our tradition keeps it alive. Wah Wah Jones, Issel, Alex Groza, etc are not unfamiliar names nor are their accomplishments. I’m proud of our program’s lasting success. Not all years are going to be winners, but the past success is a great foundation to build present and future success. It beats starting from scratch.I can't speak for others, but over the years, I've watched all those games others have recorded to properly understand our history.
The other teams were trying to win. It's all the same to me.
Doesn't it seem kind of foolish and bandwagon-like to disregard past teams?
his 50 greatest programs thread to only include KU stats for the last 40 years?
KU was a good program prior to that. I'm not sure why ppl dismiss it.
Yep. And the numbers in the modern era are what they are. Sorry, chief.
40 years is a pretty decent sample. Longer than my lifetime. And during that time, you come up short. Deal with it.