Does that really bother you?Not saying you care but the media acts like he can do no wrong.
Does that really bother you?Not saying you care but the media acts like he can do no wrong.
Parents should never question PT at that level. That is like David Robinsons dad asking Pop about PT in SA.
And how do the parents know what Semi did in practice.
Again, you are basing a criticism off speculation and opinion.They don't. It's his word against theirs. But questioning the work ethic of a player who is now being called the most "jacked" player in the NBA? LOL. A little suspect.
Says the idiot who ignores a 2013 NIT for UK and thinks Duke underachieves.
Priceless
And K was correct. He should have never gone to the draft.Ask William Avery what K said to him when he was leaving for the draft.... in front of his parents.
2013 NIT first round loss. NIT = Not Invited Tournament.1. LEHIGH
2. MERCER
F'N PRICELESS.
2013 NIT first round loss. NIT = Not Invited Tournament.
BTW, those years when K had the #1 class and underachieved (your words), what was UK class ranked? Hmmmmm, #2 a couple of times, top 5 the others.
How many McDaa's does it take to lose a first round NIT game?
You seem to have forgot some UK blunders.2 embarrassments is worse than 1.
1. LEHIGH
2. MERCER
F'N PRICELESS.
I went to a Duke game at NC State and sat behind the Duke bench. K hounded the officials with profanities all game. He is a joke.
I can honestly say, I have never disliked another person/coach or school because of the way the media portrays them.Not really. Just making a comment.
I agree but not everybody thinks the way you do. I am sure Donald Trump would agree.I can honestly say, I have never disliked another person/coach or school because of the way the media portrays them.
No one asked your opinion little man.Oh no, bad words!
This always makes me laugh. Grow a set.
This last post doesn't seem to fit the narrative of many of your posts on this subject.I agree but not everybody thinks the way you do. I am sure Donald Trump would agree.
Explain my narrative?This last post doesn't seem to fit the narrative of many of your posts on this subject.
So....
2009 NIT & 2013 NIT > 2012 & 2014 NCAA Tournament ?
Also, Duke had 11 guys on those two teams that finished their 4-year career at Duke. 9 of the 11 left Duke with a national title. Things worked out okay.
But the season took place, right?2009- Gillispie debacle.... nice try, though.
You seem to have forgot some UK blunders.
And if you haven't noticed, your opinion just makes me laugh and laugh.
K has two titles since UK's last one with basically both having McDaa loaded rosters.
But the season took place, right?
Outside of the Cal era. Don't care.
It's part of your history bub. If only the Cal era counts, UK only has 1 title instead of 8 since history doesn't matter to you.Outside of the Cal era. Don't care.
Really, how sad is that. What a shame the Cal era has been so disappointing then.Outside of the Cal era. Don't care.
It's part of your history bub. If only the Cal era counts, UK only has 1 title instead of 8 since history doesn't matter to you.
Hmmmm, but you brought up Gillespie to make a point. So, I guess you do care, only for the fact that it makes you feel better to ignore UK's failures.Outside of the Cal era. Don't care.
Really, how sad is that. What a shame the Cal era has been so disappointing then.
1 NC. Bottom line.
- Most wins
- Most Sweet 16's
- Most Final Fours
- ZERO first round exits
1 NC. Bottom line.
NIT first round exit. ONE NIT FIRST ROUND EXIT. Even worse.
Nope. NIT = 1 wasted season.
LEHIGH and MERCER = TWO EPIC FAILS.
Spin away, but that's the bottom line.
K has more titles this decade than Cal does in his 31-year career as Head Coach.
Whatever the argument here is, it's ****ing ******ed.
How did a thread about Duke having a good weekend come to this point where you’re talking about Cal? How come every thread you seem to be apart of ends up with you posting Cal and Kentucky’s resume? Don’t you get sick of doing that? I mean it’s the same shit all day in half of the threads on this board. Clearly none of you are getting through to each other so why bother anymore? You guys are ruining everything.It's pretty simple... Cal era at UK /K during same timeframe. 2 titles for K, but 2 huge, embarrassing failures as well.
Not to mention....
So..... when people like you guys try to spout off about Cal and his alleged 'shortcomings' at UK.... there's a list of facts getting in the way of your cool story, bro.
- Not as many wins
- Not as many NCAA Tournament wins
- Not as many Sweet 16's
- Not as many Final Fours
How did a thread about Duke having a good weekend come to this point where you’re talking about Cal? How come every thread you seem to be apart of ends up with you posting Cal and Kentucky’s resume? Don’t you get sick of doing that? I mean it’s the same shit all day in half of the threads on this board. Clearly none of you are getting through to each other so why bother anymore? You guys are ruining everything.
How did a thread about Duke having a good weekend come to this point where you’re talking about Cal? How come every thread you seem to be apart of ends up with you posting Cal and Kentucky’s resume? Don’t you get sick of doing that? I mean it’s the same shit all day in half of the threads on this board. Clearly none of you are getting through to each other so why bother anymore? You guys are ruining everything.
What does a NIT season feel like? Asking as a fan of a blue blood that hasn't been to one this century.It's pretty simple... Cal era at UK /K during same timeframe. 2 titles for K, but 2 huge, embarrassing failures as well.
Not to mention....
So..... when people like you guys try to spout off about Cal and his alleged 'shortcomings' at UK.... there's a list of facts getting in the way of your cool story, bro.
- Not as many wins
- Not as many NCAA Tournament wins
- Not as many Sweet 16's
- Not as many Final Fours