South Carolina is barely top 50 in the NET. Only top 30 teams are quad 1 wins at home.
SEC race is going to be a good one between UK and UT...
- Thread starter ABVolsFan92
- Start date
South Carolina is barely top 50 in the NET. Only top 30 teams are quad 1 wins at home.
I was talking about Auburn's Quad 1 record. Alabama's their only quad 1 win.
LOL. They can beat Texas, Oklahoma and Oklahoma St but no one in the SEC? Keep the idiotic takes coming. 🤣
All that money spent on football only to suck in both sports.
Did you beat texas last season? Auburn has 13
more team titles than kansas has and that doesnt count the extras we could claim in football. No really even a comparison here
Imagine needing to resort to boasting about unrecognized mythical titles and Equestrian. Yikes. 🤣
Guess I'll have to settle for a sports life of watching KU and the Chiefs winning every year. Dammit.
i didnt even include equestrian. its even a bigger gap if i do.
I attended and saw auburn win a national title in football. I have been to a final 4 in basketball. I have seen auburn baseball go to 2 of the last 4 college world series. I have seen my nfl team win a superbowl also. I also was in attendance to see your blow chiefs a 4 TD lead in a playoff game. Yeah I am doing alright
Last edited:
Cool. Glad that you're satisfied. But you're talking shit to someone who's seen three SB wins in the last 5 years, with another SB appearance and 6 straight conference championship appearances, 3 CBB national titles, many final fours, a World Series title, back to back WS appearances, an MLS title, constant division/league titles, and even an Orange Bowl win by the shitty football program. Most of this within the last 15ish years.
All in small market "flyover" country.
LOL at you trying to claim the royals on just the two years they were good. Doubt you have even watched a full game since that 2015 year
So South Carolina is 4-4 in Q1, while Auburn has only 1 Q1 win. Auburn IS considered a Q1 win but South Carolina is not. What the fuQ1 is wrong with this system?! Honestly the NET is such a shit algo.
Meh I guess we'll see. I've never seen less effort trying to defend the 3 ball than I did in that UCONN marquette game. Marquette just 1v1s every possession, no ball movement. Lets see how they look vs Xavier.
Yeah but they are getting Q1 points for beating teams like St. johns, Providence, Butler, Seton Hall etc. Basically every road game they play is Q1.
All this stuff is great, but I have climbed Mt Everest and even re-tied "green boots" laces for him.(look it up) I was also in Berlin 1936 as an egg in my grandmother to witness Jesse Owens win the sprint races. When I was a child I built a city out of building blocks, now 600,000 people live there. I once had an awkward moment, just to see how it feels. ect...
Apparently, while beating 13 loss Villanova at home is a Q1 win.
The back to back WS runs might be my favorite sports memory. Why wouldn't I claim it? Did you forget that Auburn's had one good tourney run in their entire existence and didn't even close the deal?🤣
Hell, the Royals have another WS title in my lifetime too.
I grew up listening to the Royals on the radio nightly when they were losing 100 games every year. I'm not a bandwagoner like an SEC football turned basketball fan.
SC might not be as weak as their #47 or whatever NET ranking, but I do think they're probably overrated. They've gotten a lot of mileage out of a couple solid wins.
Haven't seen Marquette recently, but they looked great early in the year.
Keep in mind that UConn struggled for awhile in conference play last year, before steamrolling everybody in the tourney. I think people are selling the BE short again.
It's not a bad conference it is just getting a ton of NET love which in turn makes all of their away games and some questionable home games Q1 games.
Seton Hall lost to USC, Iowa, Rutgers, Baylor by 8, 13, 7, and 18 pts. The only p5 team they beat OOC was Mizzu by 6. Right after escaping Mizzou by 6 they go on to beat UCONN by 15 and have won a bunch of BigE games.
My eye test just hasn't been impressed with the Big E this year other than UCONN. When I watch a Big12 or SEC game I see so much energy on D, Guys trying to bust through screens diving all over the place. When I watch a Big East game it just seems like a different level of effort. I'm sure I've just had bad luck with the games I've seen.
Last edited:
bandwagoner? hadly. you showing you are full of shit again? Sorry texas and oklahoma wont be subsidizing your school anymore
Yeah, but the SEC was 3-16 vs ranked teams in non-con, and some of your top teams had losses to bad teams. Why do so many SEC fans refuse to credit other leagues? Some of you act like you've had the success of the ACC or old Big East.
Last edited:
CD, don't try to stop me! If Flagger and Aubie can sit around and make up a bunch of Bullshit and then brag about it, I can too!
I'm not saying the SEC is all that great. I just don't think all the BigE teams are either. I think the ACC is much much better than what the computers say FWIW. I see the ACC and see last years final 4 Miami team with a lot of returning players and they cant get wins.
They brought back everybody from a team that was good last year. A talented, experienced, athletic team that can shoot and has a lot of continuity isn't the type of team I'd bet against in March.
Hey I hope you're right. I have much more faith in a team like Creighton than I do them. Hopefully I'm wrong.
