I think making them illegal after 6 weeks (so in the best case scenario the woman has about 2 weeks to decide, worst case she’s unaware) is beyond fvcked up. Offering money to rat on people looking out for young women, so they can be fined and/or jailed for providing information or resources to facilitate an abortion, is just as bad. Hiding behind the guise of protecting unborn life is unethical.There is nothing wrong with opposing abortions period. If people want to support them that's fine as well. I don't judge either way but to think one or the other makes someone an awful person is pretty silly.
I think making them illegal after 6 weeks (so in the best case scenario the woman has about 2 weeks to decide, worst case she’s unaware) is beyond fvcked up. Offering money to rat on people looking out for young women, so they can be fined and/or jailed for providing information or resources to facilitate an abortion, is just as bad. Hiding behind the guise of protecting unborn life is unethical.
They effectively skirted the Supreme Court’s ruling. And this Supreme Court seems cool with that. Political influence and bias among Supreme Court justices and their lifetime appointments is another bag of worms I won’t get into.
Hypothetically, they could hear a case that would overturn laws like that, but it seems unlikely they will.
Brooky, do you enjoy your life?I think making them illegal after 6 weeks (so in the best case scenario the woman has about 2 weeks to decide, worst case she’s unaware) is beyond fvcked up. Offering money to rat on people looking out for young women, so they can be fined and/or jailed for providing information or resources to facilitate an abortion, is just as bad. Hiding behind the guise of protecting unborn life is unethical.
They effectively skirted the Supreme Court’s ruling. And this Supreme Court seems cool with that. Political influence and bias among Supreme Court justices and their lifetime appointments is another bag of worms I won’t get into.
Hypothetically, they could hear a case that would overturn laws like that, but it seems unlikely they will.
Brooky, do you enjoy your life?
That's what I am talking about my man, it's good to be alive, just the chance for a future. 😎 👍Got a big raise this year, 2 beautiful kids, and going to be in LA for a week.
So, yes
The man is traveling to the mecca of his people! Many a lib have made this glorious pilgrimage to the holy land. It is customary to leave a hot steamer in the streets upon your arrival.going to be in LA for a week.
It’s like deja vu all over againThe man is traveling to the mecca of his people! Many a lib have made this glorious pilgrimage to the holy land. It is customary to leave a hot steamer in the streets upon your arrival.
It's refreshing to see the president of the United States tell hospitals to prioritize covid treatments based on the race of the patients.
I'd be f'd in Memphis.It's refreshing to see the president of the United States tell hospitals to prioritize covid treatments based on the race of the patients.
In your snooty way, please educate us all on what racism is. Also, why word it to say minorities and people of color? Why not just prioritize treatment based on anyone with elevated risks? Why publicly announce that this is how you are treating patients? Even without going so far as to say this is a racist policy, it is still an unnecessary insertion of race where it has no business. And that is what you stupid leftist can't grasp.I bet people who don’t understand what racism is think it’s racist to prioritize COVID treatments based on race (elevated risk factors).
Tell me all about these 2 gendersYour common sense tells you that it’s rational to think and teach there are more than two genders? Your common sense thinks it’s okay to teach our youth history thru a lens of racism? The guy that’s scared to give an inch of ground thinks leftist absurd ideas are inconsequential, but by god, the right thinks all immigrants are terrorists Bc we think we should have secure borders and document all newcomers to the USA.
Ummm. No you don’t.I decide based on common sense. Or my opinion of common sense. You decide based on your opinion of common sense.
That’s how that works.
Penis= Male, Vagina=Female. 2 sexes, 2Genders.Gender is different from sex. So, yes, common sense a) dictates there are probably more than 2, b) there is no real world significant impact to my life if somebody decides there are two or 100 genders. It epitomizes “inconsequential.”
American history is undoubtedly and inextricably linked to slavery and racism, at the very least through the 1990’s, in terms of policy decisions, human rights, economics, and war. So, yes, discussing the impact of race on those things throughout history is common sense. Notably, this doesn’t come close to placing blame or guilt or value judgements on any particular race. Notably, it doesn’t change what history is taught, so it’s inconsequential in terms of kids being as educated as I was in school.
On the other side, we see human rights violations in the name of national security. This goes beyond border security in Mexico. On the other side, we see morally bankrupt abortion laws. Stepping away from the social stuff, economically, we see the ideology that if you make things easier for rich people and businesses that money will flow down the ladder and solve our problems. This, despite that economic policy never approaching success in practice.
And you know this how?Muslims are chastised in this country more than any other religion. It’s not particularly close.
Thank you.In your snooty way, please educate us all on what racism is. Also, why word it to say minorities and people of color? Why not just prioritize treatment based on anyone with elevated risks? Why publicly announce that this is how you are treating patients? Even without going so far as to say this is a racist policy, it is still an unnecessary insertion of race where it has no business. And that is what you stupid leftist can't grasp.
Agreed.His point was about Islam in general, not just in America. Christians are chastised for their beliefs in this country by the left much more than Muslims are. There are many more extreme Muslims in the world than Christians. This is not debatable. It is flawed logic.
So which gender would you classify someone with a vagina but internal testes?Penis= Male, Vagina=Female. 2 sexes, 2Genders.
I believe there should be a trans sports category. Swim, run, whatever the sport is. Boys, Girls, Trans.
Dearborn Michigan.I’m missing the yikes. Wait, you think American Liberals who are Muslim want America to be run like a middle eastern country?
I love you Jimbo, but c’mon; get real. There are African and Asian countries with governments heavily influenced by Christianity that brutally beat and execute homosexuals by law. Do American Christians want that?
How many of those are there in the world.So which gender would you classify someone with a vagina but internal testes?
How bout someone with a dick and a vagina?
Enough to where we are having a conversation about it.How many of those are there in the world.