Doubt it happens this year.I hope Hawkins can push Grandison to the 3.
He looks improved, but is still 9th in the rotation so far.
Doubt it happens this year.I hope Hawkins can push Grandison to the 3.
Does Izzo plan on having Christie at the 3 when Brown is out? (At least until Brooks is playable on defense)I think the offense will be better than last year. Better spacing.
We’re high on Brooks, he’s a better shooter than expected, but apparently defensively he’s not where we want him at yet and that’s what’s holding him back. He needs to drop some baby fat. He did join the team like a month late. When he can start playing defense at that level he’s in the rotation. He’s a very strong wing who’s also a good shooter.
Interesting theory - playing nobodies makes you better. Heard from no one who actually understands improvement. Playing nobodies is good - heard from conmen and politicians.
I think we could see some Christie at the 3, but Hall has slimmed down and is apparently going to play some 3/4.Does Izzo plan on having Christie at the 3 when Brown is out? (At least until Brooks is playable on defense)
I like Bingham at the 5, certainly opens up the floor offensively more so than Marble and Sissoko did last year. He’s not lights out or anything, but he’s got good form and is at least willing to shoot it
I have a ton of respect for Beilien - see my tag line. Never the less you get better by playing top competition. Not cupcakes. The problem is you need “wins” to get the seed lines. It’s a con. Duke makes a living at it - most people won’t argue the point. Give me what Izzo does - play tough schedule and get better. Not interested in the semantics of how far you went in the roulette wheel of the dance - are you a great team ? Great teams say bring it on. How many NCs has perrrenial top seed (and talented) Gonzaga won? How tough is their overall schedule. Purdue would be a two seed every year playing in that cupcake league.@pig1960 Beilein has literally referred to the non-conference as "preseason" before. He liked scheduling a few marquee games each non-conference but then loaded it with cupcakes.
I'm not saying that's the only way to do it but it's hard to argue with his results and say it isn't viable.
I have a ton of respect for Beilien - see my tag line. Never the less you get better by playing top competition. Not cupcakes. The problem is you need “wins” to get the seed lines. It’s a con. Duke makes a living at it - most people won’t argue the point. Give me what Izzo does - play tough schedule and get better. Not interested in the semantics of how far you went in the roulette wheel of the dance - are you a great team ? Great teams say bring it on. How many NCs has perrrenial top seed (and talented) Gonzaga won? How tough is their overall schedule. Purdue would be a two seed every year playing in that cupcake league.
Bro, we get it.For the record, and I thought I made it pretty clear, the idea isn't that playing all cupcakes is ideal. It's that the Big Ten is so loaded that the overall SOS ends up top 10-20 regardless of the Non-conference.
Playing a loaded non-conference isn't a necessity. Beilein had a lot of success with the way he handled scheduling. Several marquee games and then a bunch of cupcakes.
Bro, we get it.
Have you seen Gonzaga’s Non Con schedule recently? How many NCs has Purdue won playing a “tough” non con schedule?I have a ton of respect for Beilien - see my tag line. Never the less you get better by playing top competition. Not cupcakes. The problem is you need “wins” to get the seed lines. It’s a con. Duke makes a living at it - most people won’t argue the point. Give me what Izzo does - play tough schedule and get better. Not interested in the semantics of how far you went in the roulette wheel of the dance - are you a great team ? Great teams say bring it on. How many NCs has perrrenial top seed (and talented) Gonzaga won? How tough is their overall schedule. Purdue would be a two seed every year playing in that cupcake league.
You’ve made the same point 12 times. Some people have a different opinion on the matter which you won’t be able to change. That’s fine, but there’s no need to beat a dead horse.Bro, you read pigs post and came away thinking he gets what I was saying? You guys have a weird inability to not recognize how dumb some of your posters are.
You’ve made the same point 12 times. Some people have a different opinion on the matter which you won’t be able to change. That’s fine, but there’s no need to beat a dead horse.
He said teams get better by playing tougher teams and not cupcakes, which more than a few posters have said already. & then you laid out the Beilein method again, & pig disagreed with you & took a hard stance on the topic (which I also disagree with), & then you made the same Beilein point again. I’m just saying, we get it.Did you read pigs post? You’re just as dumb as him if you read his post and came away with it just being him disagreeing with me.
I have a ton of respect for Beilien - see my tag line. Never the less you get better by playing top competition. Not cupcakes. The problem is you need “wins” to get the seed lines. It’s a con. Duke makes a living at it - most people won’t argue the point. Give me what Izzo does - play tough schedule and get better. Not interested in the semantics of how far you went in the roulette wheel of the dance - are you a great team ? Great teams say bring it on. How many NCs has perrrenial top seed (and talented) Gonzaga won? How tough is their overall schedule. Purdue would be a two seed every year playing in that cupcake league.
He said teams get better by playing tougher teams and not cupcakes, which more than a few posters have said already. & then you laid out the Beilein method again, & pig disagreed with you & took a hard stance on the topic (which I also disagree with), & then you made the same Beilein point again. I’m just saying, we get it.
He said teams get better by playing tougher teams and not cupcakes, which more than a few posters have said already. & then you laid out the Beilein method again, & pig disagreed with you & took a hard stance on the topic (which I also disagree with), & then you made the same Beilein point again. I’m just saying, we get it.
Why do you care so much?“Not interested in the semantics of how far you went in the roulette wheel of the dance”
That is an NC_Trojan level troll that you just gloss over because he’s a Purdue fan. Beilein’s tournament success is now irrelevant to the discussion of if his scheduling was fine for his teams. Make two national title games in a decade? Irrelevant. Especially not relevant when we are talking about preparation for March.
It was a dumb post and you’d be calling him out if he didn’t like your team. You’re very odd about not being able to do that.
Purdue fans don’t think tournament success matters… I wonder why? 🤔“Not interested in the semantics of how far you went in the roulette wheel of the dance”
That is an NC_Trojan level troll that you just gloss over because he’s a Purdue fan. Beilein’s tournament success is now irrelevant to the discussion of if his scheduling was fine for his teams. Make two national title games in a decade? Irrelevant. Especially not relevant when we are talking about preparation for March.
It was a dumb post and you’d be calling him out if he didn’t like your team. You’re very odd about not being able to do that.
Purdue fans don’t think tournament success matters… I wonder why? 🤔
Why do you care so much?
I know what your point is for the love of God lmao.My entire point from the get go was that our conference is strong enough to test teams that Big Ten teams don’t really need to hammer the Non Conference. He brought up Gonzaga as if they are relevant to that point. They are in the complete opposite boat.
I said I disagree with his hard stance take. I glossed over most of the discussion because we’ve already had the discussion. I’ve had no problems arguing with Purdue posters in the past either, so don’t even go down that rabbit hole.“Not interested in the semantics of how far you went in the roulette wheel of the dance”
That is an NC_Trojan level troll that you just gloss over because he’s a Purdue fan. Beilein’s tournament success is now irrelevant to the discussion of if his scheduling was fine for his teams. Make two national title games in a decade? Irrelevant. Especially not relevant when we are talking about preparation for March.
It was a dumb post and you’d be calling him out if he didn’t like your team. You’re very odd about not being able to do that.
I said I disagree with him Hail. You’re trying to argue something that is unquantifiable anyway.In a discussion literally about how a non conference prepares a team for March, I’m being told Beilein’s March results are irrelevant because it’s Russian Roulette.
Re-read that and think about how little sense that makes.
So what’s a better way to gauge post season preparedness than, ugh, the past decade of results?
And this somehow not only makes sense to Pig but @otte21 sees nothing wrong with it. I feel like I’m in the twilight zone.
I know what your point is for the love of God lmao.
I said I disagree with his hard stance take. I glossed over most of the discussion because we’ve already had the discussion. I’ve had no problems arguing with Purdue posters in the past either, so don’t even go down that rabbit hole.
I said I disagree with him Hail. You’re trying to argue something that is unquantifiable anyway.
Where did I defend him? Link?You defended his shit post without even reading it lol. It’s okay, I get it. You assumed he was saying the same stuff you were yesterday. He wasn’t.
Why not tell the Purdue poster to let it go?Where did I defend him? Link?
I just told you to let it go because you had made your point over & over.
If he makes the same argument over & over I will. I’ve already said I disagree with his hard stance take on the topic. Plus Gonzaga was a horrible example anyway because they always have a tough non-con but a weak conference.Why not tell the Purdue poster to let it go?
Fan X of an opposing school doesn't agree with my opinion so he must be dumb!Bro, you read pigs post and came away thinking he gets what I was saying? You guys have a weird inability to not recognize how dumb some of your posters are.
Why do you weirdos think it’s our responsibility to hold other Purdue posters accountable? I have no interest in doing so. It’s a fvcking message board.Why not tell the Purdue poster to let it go?
It’s called being consistent. If you are going to call Hail or anyone else out on something, you should also call Purdue posters out on the same things. We know you have no interest in doing so.Why do you weirdos think it’s our responsibility to hold other Purdue posters accountable? I have no interest in doing so. It’s a fvcking message board.
Fan X of an opposing school doesn't agree with my opinion so he must be dumb!
Signed,
@hailtoyourvictor
Where did I defend him? Link?
I just told you to let it go because you had made your point over & over.
I haven’t kept up, but I see @NC_Trojan10 liked all his posts… so he must be wrongFan X of an opposing school doesn't agree with my opinion so he must be dumb!
Signed,
@hailtoyourvictor
Why do you weirdos think it’s our responsibility to hold other Purdue posters accountable? I have no interest in doing so. It’s a fvcking message board.