ADVERTISEMENT

*Official* B1G In-Season Thread

So, you want me to believe, that Beilein and Izzo are better recruiters, better talent developers AND better recruiters, yet Painter has a better record than both of those two over the last 5 years? Whatever floats your boat man.
So five years is all that matters??? Lol. Don’t be dumb.

Here’s a question. Would you trade Beilein’s record over the last five years for Painter’s? I know i would.
 
But, but, but......You told us context matters. Rob was injured , missed games and Archie mentioned that he’s just getting back into form these last couple weeks. Weird you wouldn’t consider that.
Rob didn't play in 3 games during the New Years break. IU went 2-1 in those games. Since he returned, he's played 27 minutes a game. If his injury was really that serious, Archie wouldn't have played him. 17 games to get over a concussion? Ok... Nojel had a stubbed toe so that really stunted his production this year.
 
I think he's got a real decision to make this year because you can only do it twice and withdraw - if I'm remembering correctly. Painter is a big proponent of those guys going through the process and I would expect Haarms to do so this year; but if Eastern goes through it again this season, it limits what he can do next summer.

His deficiencies right now are the same they were in April of 2019, so not sure what good it would do him other than to get some positive feedback on his defensive growth. I would hope he doesn't; but as you said, there are some wildcard variables to keep in mind.

Yeah I feel bad for him, because he is a very solid player. The kid has to learn to shoot if he wants even a sniff of the NBA. He improved the free throws but that needs to be extended. In today’s NBA the kid has zero chance currently
 
  • Like
Reactions: KisteK and Toast.
Rob didn't play in 3 games during the New Years break. IU went 2-1 in those games. Since he returned, he's played 27 minutes a game. If his injury was really that serious, Archie wouldn't have played him. 17 games to get over a concussion? Ok... Nojel had a stubbed toe so that really stunted his production this year.

Comparing a concussion to stubbed toe...interesting
 
Rob didn't play in 3 games during the New Years break. IU went 2-1 in those games. Since he returned, he's played 27 minutes a game. If his injury was really that serious, Archie wouldn't have played him. 17 games to get over a concussion? Ok... Nojel had a stubbed toe so that really stunted his production this year.
Lulz. Archie mentioned several times recently that Rob is just getting back into form. Again, context matters. Hell, even Underwood mentioned you could see that Rob was finally back to form. Plus, I think Archie knows better whether Rob could play or sit and whether he’s 100% or not. I know I sure as shit would take his comments over some man loving Purdue fanboy.
 
Yeah I feel bad for him, because he is a very solid player. The kid has to learn to shoot if he wants even a sniff of the NBA. He improved the free throws but that needs to be extended. In today’s NBA the kid has zero chance currently
Haarms has zero chance at the NBA as well. Europe is a possibility for both.
 
It's not debatable yet, Painter has better conference records than both over the last 5 years. Arbitrary number I know, but consider this. Over the last 10 years Beilein has a 59% conference record, Izzo has a 70% conference record and Painter has a 66% conference record. This includes an 8-10 and 5-13 conf record for Painter. Over the last 5 years Beilein has a 61% conference record, Izzo has a 73% conference record and Painter has a 75% conference record. So the 5 and 10 year trends show that Beilein and Izzo, although improved their 5 year trend over the 10 year, they are both only 2-3% better over that time. Painter jumped 9%. This is a tad deceiving because the two year blip makes his improvement look much higher. So let's take out those two years and insert the two years just prior to the slump. Again, this is very arbitrary but an exercise worth looking at. So the 10 year trend for Painter minus the two down years and adding the very two years prior (so 12 years minus the 2 slump years) his conference record is 73%. That's better than Izzo's 10 year record.

Now, I know you are going to make a bunch of arguments against what I just did, and honestly you should have some good arguments. What I was trying to demonstrate here is that Painter is a better coach than you are giving him credit for and I think you are making NCAA tourney successes your primary factor. Which as I stated before, Izzo and Beilein get higher rated recruits and are very key to tourney success, besides the occasional outlier. This should also be a good argument that Painter is actually a very good coach, pretty much on par with the other two (besides recruiting obviously).

Painter needs more post season success. He’s a solid coach and he does well with what he has but Sweet 16’s aren’t going to get it done.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SNU0821
Beilein and Izzo are better at X’s and O’s, recruiting and developing talent. Again, not debatable except to fanboy Purdue homers.
No Purdue Homer will argue recruiting but X's and O's and developing talent is debateable. Just because you say it a hundred times doesn't make it true.
 
  • Like
Reactions: klize17
Lulz. Archie mentioned several times recently that Rob is just getting back into form. Again, context matters. Hell, even Underwood mentioned you could see that Rob was finally back to form. Plus, I think Archie knows better whether Rob could play or sit and whether he’s 100% or not. I know I sure as shit would take his comments over some man loving Purdue fanboy.
i don't even know what "getting back to form" even means honestly. Dude had 13 points in a loss @ NW. Had 13 & 7 in a loss to Iowa. i love these subjective cut offs
 
I’ll ask like I did everyone else. You’re making a team and picking a PG, who do you take?
That's not your original point though. Stop moving the goalposts. Nojel was the better player this year. And it isn't close.
 
No Purdue Homer will argue recruiting but X's and O's and developing talent is debateable. Just because you say it a hundred times doesn't make it true.
It really isn’t debatable. Facts must hurt. There isn’t one aspect of coach I would take Painter over Izzo or Beilein. Let’s see, shall we...


Recruiting? Izzo/Beilein >>> Painter
Development of players? Izzo/Beilein >>> Painter
X’s and O’s? Izzo/Beilein >>> Painter
 
That's not your original point though. Stop moving the goalposts. Nojel was the better player this year. And it isn't close.

Both of my points are true. They’re pgs, one had better assist/turnover numbers with fewer minutes. As you said not even close.
 
  • Like
Reactions: klize17 and SNU0821
No Purdue Homer will argue recruiting but X's and O's and developing talent is debateable. Just because you say it a hundred times doesn't make it true.

I’ll agree to X and Os but not sure about the developing talent. He develops players for sure but depending on what the end game is supposed to be not sure it’s better than those two.
 
Both of my points are true. They’re pgs, one had better assist/turnover numbers with fewer minutes. As you said not even close.
One played for a much better team and was an All-B1G defensive player. Rob didn't even sniff All-Freshman. Ouch.
 
In conference play, Nojel scores more, rebounds more, has more assists, and is a better defender on a clearly better team.

tenor.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: SNU0821
I’ll ask like I did everyone else. You’re making a team and picking a PG, who do you take?
That depends on who else is on the roster. Probably Phinisee for his long term potential but for this season, probably Eastern unless the team surrounding him is offensively inefficient.
 
That depends on who else is on the roster. Probably Phinisee for his long term potential but for this season, probably Eastern unless the team surrounding him is offensively inefficient.

Today, this day, 3/12/2018, you're picking a PG first, who do you take?
 
Today, this day, 3/12/2018, you're picking a PG first, who do you take?

To play a single game today? Nojel. And then I'm surrounding him with players that fit well with him and allow him to impact the game the ways he does.
 
So, you want me to believe, that Beilein and Izzo are better recruiters, better talent developers AND better X's and O's coaches yet Painter has a better record than both of those two over the last 5 years? Whatever floats your boat man.

"Better record" is kind of deceiving.

Painter last 5 years: 2 B1G titles, 0 BTT, 0 FF / E8, 4 NCAAT wins

Izzo last 5: 2 B1G titles, 2 BTT, 1 FF, 1 E8, 9 NCAAT wins

Beilein last 5: 1 B1G, 2 BTT, 1 FF, 1 E8, 1 S16, 10 NCAAT wins
 
It really isn’t debatable. Facts must hurt. There isn’t one aspect of coach I would take Painter over Izzo or Beilein. Let’s see, shall we...


Recruiting? Izzo/Beilein >>> Painter
Development of players? Izzo/Beilein >>> Painter
X’s and O’s? Izzo/Beilein >>> Painter
I didn't say I would take Painter over them. I said it's debateable, you said it isn't. Stop moving.

Painter just shared the B1G title with an all American and a bunch of........I don't recall all the various unflattering terms you have used for the other players........let's just say players that weren't highly rated. That says something about X's and O's and development.
If a coach can't recruit worth a damn but wins lots of games, how does that happen without being a good game coach or talent developer? Luck?
 
a little per 40 numbers

metric: nojel/Rob
pts 10.6/10.4
ast 3.5/4.3
TO 2.1/1.8
reb 8/4.3
stl 1.68/1.63
fg% .486/.374
3pt%.000/.330

Tells me Rob was the better PG.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SNU0821
To play a single game today? Nojel. And then I'm surrounding him with players that fit well with him and allow him to impact the game the ways he does.

lol you are THAT guy. You want a PG with fewer assists and more turnovers and can't shoot. Makes sense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SNU0821
lol you are THAT guy. You want a PG with fewer assists and more turnovers and can't shoot. Makes sense.
Nojel is the better player. It's not close at the moment. Stats don't quantify his impact on defense.
 
No Purdue Homer will argue recruiting but X's and O's and developing talent is debateable. Just because you say it a hundred times doesn't make it true.

How is developing talent debatable? How many first round picks and draft picks for the three?

Also what seed do you think your going to get the tMB worst poster bracket?
 
  • Like
Reactions: SNU0821
lol you are THAT guy. You want a PG with fewer assists and more turnovers and can't shoot. Makes sense.
Well, I run a motion offense so I don't need a PG with a high assist total. Purdue hasn't had a player average 5 assists in almost 30 years. But I do need a guy who is versatile enough to defend the opponent's best guard or forward.
 
How is developing talent debatable? How many first round picks and draft picks for the three?

Counting draft picks is a really flawed effort if trying to evaluate talent development. Guys like Miles Bridges and Jaren Jackson were being drafted whether they went to MSU or Drexel.
 
Is 30% trash? Is 0% trash?

He's taken 4 3's lol. Not sure why you keep harping on that. He knows he's not a good outside shooter so he rarely shoots 3's. He was more efficient than RP on offense this year. Now that could change moving forward but based on what we saw this year alone, Eastern was the better overall player. Not sure how it can be debated honestly.
 
ADVERTISEMENT