ADVERTISEMENT

*Official* B1G In-Season Thread

Just some info when you are contemplating team success so far, here are the Big Ten KenPom SOS Ranks so far:

Illinois - 6
Wisky - 15
Purdue - 19
PSU - 20
MSU - 22
Minnesota - 32
Michigan - 48
Rutgers - 87
Iowa - 92
IU - 112
NW - 140
OSU - 169
Nebraska - 198
Maryland - 282

Where do you see that
 
Just some info when you are contemplating team success so far, here are the Big Ten KenPom SOS Ranks so far:

Illinois - 6
Wisky - 15
Purdue - 19
PSU - 20
MSU - 22
Minnesota - 32
Michigan - 48
Rutgers - 87
Iowa - 92
IU - 112
NW - 140
OSU - 169
Nebraska - 198
Maryland - 282
This is kind of misleading though. For instance, if you take 2 teams off of IUs schedule I'm guessing that their SOS would be a lot better than 112.
 
This is kind of misleading though. For instance, if you take 2 teams off of IUs schedule I'm guessing that their SOS would be a lot better than 112.

tenor.gif
 
that is consistent of nearly every team on there.
I agree that every team has bad opponents on their schedule. However, theres a drastic difference between the 340th team and the 220th team in regards to the SOS. Over the course of the whole season, it won't be nearly as drastic, but with just an 8 game sample size, it could be a large variance.
 
I agree that every team has bad opponents on their schedule. However, theres a drastic difference between the 340th team and the 220th team in regards to the SOS. Over the course of the whole season, it won't be nearly as drastic, but with just an 8 game sample size, it could be a large variance.
That's how stats work. Omitting a team is stupid.
 
that is consistent of nearly every team on there.
Agreed but some teams have 300+ type cupcakes on their schedule that drag down the SOS. So it's not gonna be equal among all teams. IMO, it's a valid statement, to a point.
 
If you take two other teams off, I'm guesssing their SOS would be a lot worse than 112.

That's kind of my whole point....with only an 8 game sample size...any SOS being put out can be misleading. Only 8 games can allow for 1 or 2 outlier games to have a wide swing in the numbers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SNU0821
That's kind of my whole point....with only an 8 game sample size...any SOS being put out can be misleading. Only 8 games can allow for 1 or 2 outlier games to have a wide swing in the numbers.
Yup. At the end of the season, it doesn't matter. But with only a handful of games, it can matter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jace46555
Agreed but some teams have 300+ type cupcakes on their schedule that drag down the SOS. So it's not gonna be equal among all teams. IMO, it's a valid statement, to a point.
Exactly...with just 8 games it's too small of a sample size. Over the course of a whole season it won't allow for a drastic swing one way or another.
 
Yup. At the end of the season, it doesn't matter. But with only a handful of games, it can matter.
Exactly...with just 8 games it's too small of a sample size. Over the course of a whole season it won't allow for a drastic swing one way or another.

You two teach Turge how to schedule?
 
I agree that every team has bad opponents on their schedule. However, theres a drastic difference between the 340th team and the 220th team in regards to the SOS. Over the course of the whole season, it won't be nearly as drastic, but with just an 8 game sample size, it could be a large variance.

Agreed but some teams have 300+ type cupcakes on their schedule that drag down the SOS. So it's not gonna be equal among all teams. IMO, it's a valid statement, to a point.
It's not a predictive measure. It's a ranking of teams' schedules to date.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bMORE607
Alabama St. has played:
15
41
71
121
Unranked
Unranked

Kansas has played:
9
12
35
84
96
115
134



In what world is Alabama's States schedule more difficult?

KenPom excludes all non-D1 games from all of his metrics. So he only counts the four D1 opponents.
 
KenPom excludes all non-D1 games from all of his metrics. So he only counts the four D1 opponents.

There is no way Alabama St.'s schedule has been more difficult any way you slice it.

SOS is flawed. Playing the #1 overall team and #100 overall team is no the same as playing the #50 and #51 overall team. Going 2-0 against #50 and #51 would be much easier than going 2-0 vs #1 and #100.

That's why RPI sucked so much. Teams could pad their RPI by playing not-that-shitty-but-still-shitty cupcakes.
 
You are also more likely to go 0-2 against #50 and #51 than you are going 0-2 against #1 and #100.

Let's go further.

Say a team is a top 25 team. Playing the #1 team and #300 team should end up 1-1. Playing the #150 and #151 team should be and easy 2-0.


This isn't break through logic, either. It's been a problem with using SOS/RPI for years.
 
Alabama St. and Stanford opponents:
2 Kansas
7 Northa Carolina
13 Wisconsin

15 Iowa St.
21 Florida
41 Iowa
71 South Dakota St.
122 Akron
191 Seattle
202 UNC Wilmington
206 Middle Tennessee
243 Portland St.

NR LaGrnage
NR Birmingham Southern


Anyone that can look at that and say that Alabama St.'s schedule has been more difficult than Stanfords probably also tries to pass German instagram models as their wife on forums.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SNU0821
Alabama St. and Stanford opponents:
2 Kansas
7 Northa Carolina
13 Wisconsin

15 Iowa St.
21 Florida
41 Iowa
71 South Dakota St.
122 Akron
191 Seattle
202 UNC Wilmington
206 Middle Tennessee
243 Portland St.

NR LaGrnage
NR Birmingham Southern


Anyone that can look at that and say that Alabama St.'s schedule has been more difficult than Stanfords probably also tries to pass German instagram models as their wife on forums.

Who has tried that?
 
Looking through the TV Guide I can’t thank the B1G enough for these early conference games.

Everyone else is playing garbage. Leave that shit until the week before Christmas
 
ADVERTISEMENT