When you're outside the top 10 in high school recruiting (some years are stronger than others), it typically means you aren't a surefire stud player. a lot of times it's because a kid has good measurables and athletesism or a great shooting ability (Wiltjer), but in order to get to the NBA, you still better work your ass off.That’s the thing, for every successful 4 Star you name I can spit back a five star that didn’t like wiltjer or green or EJ or the Harrison twins. Five star burger boys that didn’t quite get that magic.
Specifically look at Herro vs Johnson last year. Both wings, Johnson was the more highly regarded player. He was a mock draft lotto pick during the first month of the season, ended up falling to the late 20s. Herro wasn’t even on the preseason mock draft radar and went top 15. So is herro a better listener than Johnson, or did johnson not work as hard? Was the coaching staff coaching them any differently? Or is it possible the high school rankings underrated herros game and perhaps overvalued Johnson’s.
Kahlil Whitney chose to quit instead of working hard.
Keldon Johnson relied on his natural ability all season. He was well ahead of Herro in November and December, but Herro passed him because he worked extremely hard.
Shai Alexander took over the reigns about mid season from Green. He worked harder and it paid off.
Some guys are driven, some have been told all their lives that they're great, so they don't think they need to put up 500 shots a day or hit the weight room hard. "Why would I do that when I'm a top 15 recruit?"
There are plenty of examples, but Booker, Shai and Herro were 4* guys because they didn't perform well on the AAU circuit and if Herro kept his word and went to Wisconsin, he would be getting ready for his junior year in college right now.