I really dont get why some think the officials are not "fair". I know a lot of these guys. I've never, not once felt any of these dudes showed any bias. Sure all officials are prone to being "influenced" by the home crowd. But hell even Huggins said he didn't think that was the case. I mean it seems like everytime we are having this discussion: Officials neing biased, or not fair. Well if that is the case, who are the officials fair with, and not biased against? It seems as if some of feel they are biased/not fair every game. If that is the case, then how does anybody ever win a game?
Officials have bad games. It happens. And when it does, ESPN makes sure to show a call, or calls, over nad over and over, and over. Write articles about it. Officiaitng isn't really any worse than it was 15 years ago. It just has more exposure now.
Example here with the OSU/UM game. A foul was called. They showed that play four times. Why? Is it that important? Why not show the good calls, four times?
Social media and technology have been the main reason officiaiting gets the scrunity it does. It's more visible today than it ever was. Back in the day Bert, you/we didn't have super-duper slow mo, with 18 different camera angles, on a 72" HD tv. Today we do. And that has played a huge role.
With that being said, there have been some ridiculously bad officiated games. And a ton of inconsistency. But no more today than there was 10-15 years ago. Biggest difference? Today those calls are more visible.