Well the NIT was founded in 38 and the NCAAT in 39 IIRC correctly. Somewhere in the 70s the NIT became shit. So that's one issue. Do you draw a hardline somewhere in the 70s and everything before that NIT counts? Eh. I think you do what we do, use the NCAAT as today's standard.I get its TODAYS measure----And that is fine. But it wasn't prior to 1939. So is everything before that just ignored? How do we handled the consensus of the NIT being the "better tournament"
From its onset and at least into the mid-1950s, the NIT was regarded as the most prestigious showcase for college basketball. All-American at Princeton and later NBA champion with the New York Knicks and United States Senator Bill Bradley stated:
And I see what ya did there.....I motion we also include 1979(NIT).
I've always just considered any title claimed before those two tournaments to be retroactively claimed nonsense. I guess I could go back and see how many extra titles Kentucky could claim. Maybe it will push ahead to UCLA and #1 where we should be.