I don’t see you denying being on our hb often, Hell it says you just browsed it at 4:03 today..
Keep up the fabrication and deflection, it’s fascinating.
You also don’t own us in Football, but I get that hyperbole is strong with you.
Gonna be a long offseason
- Thread starter HRTheCard
- Start date
Keep up the fabrication and deflection, it’s fascinating.
You also don’t own us in Football, but I get that hyperbole is strong with you.
I've watched our games vs Michigan, Gonzaga, and Michigan St more than a few times. I prefer to remember the season that way and exclude that last game.
Ah, I was over there having a short conversation with Zipp and Rocky in one of the threads about UK.
Wow, what are you doing, stalking me?
UK has scoreboard on UL in football, that's good enough for me.
Don’t flatter yourself, it literally shows your last time visited next to your post count when you click on information, not exactly rocket science..
Last edited:
Who won in football 2 of the last 3 years? Who has the most recent win?
56-10 is pretty bad and it was in your house too.
Looks like UK is owning UL in football now to me. I see another UK win this year too.
Just don't stay too long in one of our parking garages while you cry your eyes out.
Current status:
Why are we taking him serious when he can’t even spell “hilarious” correctlyHow can we expect him to know what a hypocrite is?
Trying to keep the sh!tshow confined, since it appears that calling hypocrisy in other threads will derail those threads. And to be fair, (i) you posted some good content in that thread re: the trial, and (ii) the biggest offenders in that thread were Havok and your boy UL_1986. Anyway, here's to a sh!tposting offseason like many others.
HRTheCard did in the very first post regarding Rick Pitino, and it was topical. Good for HRTheCard.
Throwing down the gauntlets about the meaning of hypocrisy! Let's see how it goes.
You literally keep asking others to define elementary terms that you probably cannot grasp or comprehend on your own. Speaks volumes. If you think you haven’t conveyed hypocritical behavior within this thread, you should probably get that GED you’ve been working towards.
Let's take a look at the MW definition of hypocrisy: "a feigning to be what one is not or to believe what one does not : behavior that contradicts what one claims to believe or feel."
That's in line with what Havok was saying. Maybe another dictionary will have a different definition: "the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform; pretense."
Same. But just to be sure, let's consult another dictionary: "pretending to be what you are not, or pretending to believe something that you do not."
Those are all pretty clear, and none of them mean that a person is a hypocrite by way of criticizing some, but not others, for a behavior or belief. So the "winner" of the (nonsensical) argument is Havok.
But UL_1986 raised a concern that we should attempt to define. Is there a word to describe what UL_1986 was getting at: that Havok was not sincere in criticizing him (and other UL posters) for derailing threads with UK-UL nonsense because (i) other, different UK posters did similar, and (ii) criticizing the derailing is itself derailing? As for the first, I believe that is a method of whataboutism: "Whataboutism (also known as whataboutery) is a variant of the tu quoquelogical fallacy that attempts to discredit an opponent's position by charging them with hypocrisy without directly refuting or disproving their argument." But it doesn't really square with the dictionary definition, so maybe there's a better word. I'm not sure about the second one, frankly. Derail-ception?
^ Based on your numerous posts today, a gif of an intellectually barren and childish adult is appropriate. As for the substance, of which you offer none, I stand by my work and the definitions in three different dictionaries.
Lol, you must be new around here. I’ll go ahead and throw you into the raftard mix, you guys all post the same drivel.
Current status:
Trying to keep the sh!tshow confined, since it appears that calling hypocrisy in other threads will derail those threads. And to be fair, (i) you posted some good content in that thread re: the trial, and (ii) the biggest offenders in that thread were Havok and your boy UL_1986. Anyway, here's to a sh!tposting offseason like many others.
Every post you quoted was a retort to someone saying something dumb besides one, the Same for Kentuhhhcky...which was also a response talking about Duke underachieving.
I never said I don't talk about Uk or take jabs. I do. We all do. But responding to KL/JC/Jeff/whomever/RipThru/etc. in the Rafter's Fan Club, does not put me on the level of them just bc I responded. My intentions aren't to derail every single thread like their's is. I mean KL will say something dumb about every team on this board in any thread and continue to repeat it no matter the context of the thread.
And it's not just because it's the off-season. This has been going on for months.
Don’t waste your breath, he’s just as ******ed as the morons you’ve already listed. Different moniker, same drivel.
Unfortunately, I think the gif that didn't work correctly made my post look more serious than it was intended to be (it was the "I'm doing my part" one from Starship Troopers). I'd still have a beer with you (and I don't like the constant derailment either).
