Dude 80% of your fan base believes the exact thing; If not more. Cal has a history of giving a longer leash to those with a higher pedigree. It's no secret. Look at his decision with the Harrison twins. Hell he even said he made a mistake by not playing Booker/Ulis more. And had he, UK probably wins that game. But again---Higher pedigree. So Cal gives a longer leash. Noting wrong with that. But sometimes it can cost you a kid like a Matthews.You're the one that said, "He will bury your ass on the bench. Unless of course you are a 5* gem. Then hey, its abut getting you drafted." Well, obviously that is false, which was my point. SGA even proved that this year when he won the starting job and much more minutes than Green. Now it's Cal's fault for not getting Matthews to stay? Kids transfer from every single program in the nation all the time, for multiple reasons. Is it always the coach's fault? Matthews certainly wasn't "shown the door" but you're going to think whatever you want anyway.
And no I do not think Cal showed Matthews the door, literally. But more of a subtle "push". Not playing him...then recruiting over his position. I mean, c'mon, dude. What would you think as a player?
Its just my opinion. I think Cal favors more high profile kids. Lots of folks among BBN think the same. SGA over Green is a bad example. Green was rated the 22nd best player; SGA the 34th. Not a huge difference between the two. MOF, SGA was just 5 spots from being consider a 5*. And I said 5* gems--As in kids like the Harrisons. Not the 22nd ranked player.