UNC, Duke, UK....
- Thread starter AuHoosier420
- Start date
Okay, if you’re gonna talk about different sports and keep moving the goal posts you need to start a new thread.
As an overall athletic department Auburn was won more titles Than UK has. Just think. As average as your football program is it still makes more money than your basketball program.
The same thing that kept calipari away for so long. People making up shit. Kentucky fans loved calling Cal a cheater before they hired him
We're also one of a handful of the sports teams that runs a profit and gives money back to the university.
This season I would give us a 50/50 shot at beating all of them. No one is scared of team that lost to the great powers of Evansville or SFA.
Cal took UMass and Memphis to the final four, And a title game. Cal went to the NBA. Huge difference
And yet you think somebody fears Auburn and Bruce Pearl? Laughing It’s a national conspiracy to keep from giving auburn their due.
He said as soon as Calipari leaves Pearl will leave Auburn. I'm surprised the NBA hasn't come calling for Pearl's wisdom. Maybe they're waiting for Pearl to do something more than a single FF run. IDK.
Your basketball team is aided being in a conference that has made loads of money off football. The SEC is where it’s at today due to football .
I didn’t say anyone fears us. This will now be the 4th time you have made something up in this thread. Quit talking out of your ass
Let’s not act like the nba is the best at hiring head coaches. I mean hell calipari bombed in the nba because of course his talent advantage wasn’t there anymore
What? Auburn made a lot more money last year as an athletic department than UK did.
Yes but your football program still makes more money than your basketball program. Which goes back to my point. You having sec football money helps drive things for your basketball program.
Uk's basketball team made 50 million in profit last year. Auburn's football made just over 60 million. I wonder (without looking it up,what UK's football made compared to Auburn's basketball.) per Forbes.
Auburn was 10th in revenue last year. uK was 17th in overall. Again football is what drives the needle and your football program aids in helping your basketball program.
https://247sports.com/ContentGallery/College-sports-top-25-money-makers-by-gross-revenue-119496046/
https://247sports.com/ContentGallery/College-sports-top-25-money-makers-by-gross-revenue-119496046/
After looking further, you guys only cleared 47 million profit (after expenses). That's below our basketball program. Again, I wonder if our football makes more than your basketball team.
We are looking at revenues only. You can’t Compare with expenses because spending in football to compete at highest level is vastly higher than basketball. It’s not a legit comparison
it's really not. We're UK and you're not.
nonsense aside is your mascot a war eagle or a tiger?
Yet We have more money than you. Kentucky rides the coat tails of the sec football powers to make money.
Our mascot is a tiger. War eagle is a battle cry.
More money and less titles. When you use that excuse you're out of ammo. Bottom line is you're not big time in college hoops, you're a wannabe.
Cal was 189-70 @ UMass(73%).
He was 214-78 at Memphis(75%)
Combined he was 403-148 at Umass and Memphis---74% winning percentage.
What type of huge talent gap did he have at those two schools?
Exactly what point is that? That high ceiling talent doesn't win? But, I mean, I just showed it does. Sure it helps to have veteran dudes. Never said it doesn't. But look at past winners---All have had elite, Top 50, 5* dudes.
Carolina---Check
Duke---Check
UK---Check
Nova---Check
UVA---Check
I don't care how experienced you are---If you do not have elite talent to go with it---You ain't winning the whole thing. Ain't happening. I mean you should know this---You root for Auburn.
Similar threads
