And the source of information he's using is a creepy porn soon-to-be ex-lawyer which is now being federally prosecuted for not only extortion, but fraud. Fraud is 110% detrimental to credibility. And that guy is using a scorned employee whose contract was terminated. I cannot count the number of times I've heard people talk all kinds of nasty garbage about their former employers and their practices. Who's to say that this isn't one of those scenarios? Now on the other hand, who's to say that it's not true? That being said, until that gets provided with something of substance, you have to take it at face value, which isn't worth much in this case.