Okay, then I assume, because you hold the abilities and ethics of the NCAA so highly there isn't any past examples where they screwed up completely? Am I correct to assume that you actually DO believe Pitino when he says he didn't know about the prostitution and also about giving money out at UL?
Also do you agree with them when they didn't punish UNC for the academic scandal that was going on for over a decade?
The NCAA has shown poor judgment time after time throughout the years...time after time.
But okay, let's act like since the NCAA didn't find the smoking bullet, there isn't one...
can you honestly say there was a smoking bullet without seeing what the investigation had?
if your answer is yes the maybe we should apply that to every person that has ever been investigated
do a little work and educate yourself on what the NCAA actually said
Please explain to me how the NCAA could prove someone innocent/guilty with no subpoena power without A. a paper trail, B. a whistleblower or C. A recording of a conversation?
Seriously, it's not like you have to rely on a crazy unrealistic situation to explain how someone can beat a NCAA investigation. People with money do this type of stuff all the time. Have someone who is either loyal, or trusted handle all communication.....that's it.
But if your willing to accept that the NCAA couldn't of screwed up here...sure. I just hope that you're not hypocritical when it comes to everyone NOT your coach.