And yet you guys will always be the 1 seed who lost to a 16 seed, nobody gives a shit about your natty after that Laughing
I give a shit so congrats on being wrong
And yet you guys will always be the 1 seed who lost to a 16 seed, nobody gives a shit about your natty after that Laughing
We lose a game in the first round after winning the natty and we get this kind of crap. B1G hasn't won a title in 21 years and had multiple teams losing in the first round this year and nothing
Nah, Big Ten is getting ripped everywhere. Sports sites, message boards, tv personalities, articles, social media, it’s bad. We all know the Big Ten is way overrated.
I give a shit so congrats on being wrong
I give a shit so congrats on being wrong
I give a shit so congrats on being wrong
And basically got handed the FF game on that call against Auburn.And yet you guys will always be the 1 seed who lost to a 16 seed, nobody gives a shit about your natty after that Laughing
I honestly don't think it's about conference, it's about having versatile rosters. The guards I see don't have that extra quickness gear to push a pace or cause issues on the defensive end. The rosters have physical strong guys up and down the roster but that can be a detriment when playing teams like North Texas that spread the floor with quicks.
I always thought the term "battle tested" was kind of funny. I mean, what good is it being battle tested if you lose 50% of your battles?
It's fine to get tested but it's very arrogant (and baseless) to assume that only happens in one conference.
I agree on the conference as a whole, but that certainly wasn't Illinois' problem ... they just flat-out laid an egg, lol. Nothing will make me feel better about that abortion of a game, but I at least hope Loyola goes on another run. They looked like a good team.
I know Underwood has done a great job but for this game it wasn't a good performance for him. He needed to turn up the heat defensively and make it tougher for Loyola to get into their half court set, and I just didn't see an effort to do that. Loyola didn't win that game due to quickness edge obviously, but more of a lack of adjustments by Illinois. Also just couldn't get a shot to fall it seemed from 3. Top guard with a real rough game overall.
Yeah, it was truly amazing how little we adjusted. I think Underwood probably had the mindset of "just keep playing our game and stay calm," but that is the OPPOSITE of what we needed. Loyola had us scouted perfectly and played one of their best games of the year, and we played right INTO their game plan. It sucks, because I honestly still think Illinois is one of the best teams in the nation, but that inability to adjust is nothing short of an epically fatal error, and that's what matters at the end of the day.
Sadly, no one cares if you’re one of the best teams in the country. They judge you by how you perform in NCAA tourney. It’s stupid and unfair but there’s no question that’s what most people in the media do.
You don't have to tell me that. Illinois basketball has a tradition that stacks up with many programs your casual fan would consider clearly better programs, but at the end of the day ... our deep Tournament runs (1942, 1989, 2005) have come up short of a Natty, and we have had FAR too many early exits as a high seed (1985 Sweet Sixteen as a 2, 1987 First Round loss as a 3, 1988 Second Round as a 3, 1990 and 2009 First Round as a 5, 2021 Second Round as a 1, etc.). If you don't win when it counts, that is definitely what people remember.