I'm so out of the loop just curious.
What computer system do you find to be the most accurate when evaluating teams?
What computer system do you find to be the most accurate when evaluating teams?
So What Methodology is Used to Evaluate Team Resumes
- Thread starter Ipartiedwithhopgood
- Start date
A combination of all the nerds and their advanced metrics. They don't watch any games, they just let their computers figure it out, and the selection committee eats it up.
The true test of evaluating teams by the common fan, is your honest non-message board opinion of opposing teams. I have a few buddies that can set aside hate/bias/homerism to give a real take on games against the hawks. Some guys literally cant see or acknowledge the oppositions strengths against your own teams weakness. The first thing I look at is the best game the opponent has played and then assume thats how they will play against the hawks. I rarely find myself over confident. You watch enough basketball---which i find i cant being a dad---the more in touch you feel with real threats on the schedule.
1, Duke
2. The rest of the ACC
3. Whatever SEC team cheats the best.
4. Gonzaga
5. Teams with most wins. Forget strength of schedule.
