ADVERTISEMENT

Since 2000, Big 10 has been impressive as any league

RockChalk82

Well-Known Member
Gold Member
Apr 1, 2019
947
745
93
Granted lacking natties, but look at this profile since 2000:

2000 Sparty natty
2002 Indiana runner up
2004 Illinois runner up
2007 Ohio state runner up
2009 Sparty runner up
2013 Michigan runner up
2015 Wisconsin runner up
2018 Michigan runner up

That’s super impressive. Why on earth they don’t have a few natties is beyond me but I think one is coming from Juwan Howard in the next 3 years.
 
Last edited:
This is more impressive (will go back one more year):
1999 UConn NC
2003 Syracuse NC
2004 UConn NC
2011 UConn NC
2013 Louisville NC
2016 'Nova NC
2018 'Nova NC

And the ACC has 8 titles, SEC 3, Big XII 2, AAC 1...so the B1G is as good as the AAC when it comes to winning and is the best in terms of losing.
 
Last edited:
This is more impressive (will go back one more year):
1999 UConn NC
2003 Syracuse NC
2004 UConn NC
2011 UConn NC
2013 Louisville NC
2016 'Nova NC
2018 'Nova NC

And the ACC has 7 titles, SEC 3, Big XII 2, AAC 1...so the B1G is as good as the AAC when it comes to winning and is the best in terms of losing.

8 Titles this century for the ACC from 4 different schools.

01 Duke
02 Maryland
05 UNC
09 UNC
10 Duke
15 Duke
17 UNC
19 Virginia

It is pretty crazy that 14 of the past 20 national champions have come from two conferences. And very easily could have been 15 titles, as UConn just left the Big East in 2013.
 
Last edited:
8 Titles this century for the ACC from 4 different schools.

01 Duke
02 Maryland
05 UNC
09 UNC
10 Duke
15 Duke
17 UNC
19 Virginia

It is pretty crazy that 14 of the past 19 national champions have come from two conferences. And very easily could have been 15 titles, as UConn just left the Big East in 2013.
That proves the best conference. It really is simple.

Now please explain why UNC kids don't have to go to class. Explain why you removed UL and kept UNC?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: LeroyOU12
That proves the best conference. It really is simple.

Now please explain why UNC kids don't have to go to class. Explain why you removed UL and kept UNC?
We werent in the acc when we won. Sane reason he has maryland listed who is now B1G
 
8 Titles this century for the ACC from 4 different schools.

01 Duke
02 Maryland
05 UNC
09 UNC
10 Duke
15 Duke
17 UNC
19 Virginia

It is pretty crazy that 14 of the past 20 national champions have come from two conferences. And very easily could have been 15 titles, as UConn just left the Big East in 2013.

ya no doubt big east and ACC been most impressive in that span.

if you go back to 1999, UConn 4 and nova 2. Louisville was in the American when they won theirs in 2013. And UConn was also in the American for one of their natties 2014.

KU desperately needs to hang one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bert Higginbotha
Granted no natties, but look at this profile since 2000:

2000 Sparty natty
2002 Indiana runner up
2004 Illinois runner up
2007 Ohio state runner up
2009 Sparty runner up
2013 Michigan runner up
2015 Wisconsin runner up
2018 Michigan runner up

That’s super impressive. Why on earth they don’t have a few natties is beyond me but I think one is coming from Juwan Howard in the next 3 years.

Well, maybe not as “impressive as any league.”

ACC has had a team in their conference at the time win their title 8 times since 2000, and also had the runner-up another 2 times. So…that’s a bit more impressive.
 
ya no doubt big east and ACC been most impressive in that span.

if you go back to 1999, UConn 4 and nova 2. Louisville was in the American when they won theirs in 2013. And UConn was also in the American for one of their natties 2014.

KU desperately needs to hang one.
Louisville was in the Big East when they won the title.
American year after.
 
Impressive for sure. It's just really hard to win it all.

it’s a crapshoot. So many KU teams should have in theory hung one. We should have 3 with unc this century.

2002 - FF
2003 - runner up
2008 - natty
2012 - runner up
2018 - FF

then 2010, 2011, and 2020 had the teams to do it.

2022 is a good shot. but I put this team with 2013, 2016-2018 kind of teams so not getting hopes up.
 
God bless time flies i thought we were in the american for ours smdh. But yall are right that run was fueled by the comeback against cuse in the BEast champ game
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bert Higginbotha
8 Titles this century for the ACC from 4 different schools.

01 Duke
02 Maryland
05 UNC
09 UNC
10 Duke
15 Duke
17 UNC
19 Virginia

It is pretty crazy that 14 of the past 20 national champions have come from two conferences. And very easily could have been 15 titles, as UConn just left the Big East in 2013.
We're gonna claim Maryland's title for the Big Ten @bMORE607 ;)
 
We're gonna claim Maryland's title for the Big Ten @bMORE607 ;)
fresh-prince-we.gif
 
The count is easy for the SEC. Kentucky 8, Florida 2 and Arkansas 1.

The ACC is not a stable conference. Schools come and go. I am not smart enough to keep up with the full count. They don't even have Notre Dame football but they have basketball. Explain that?

You realize the SEC has recently added teams from other conferences, right? Also, they're going to be adding Texas and Oklahoma in the next few years. But, yeah, please talk about the stability of the conference. The ACC shits on the SEC when it comes to basketball. Even in one of our "down years", we get 3 times as many teams in the Sweet 16 as the SEC. It might "mean more" in the SEC but the ACC actually does more.
 
I think the impressive part was the fact that the B1G had 6 different teams make it to the NC game, while others seem to always be the same teams each time. Will be interesting to see if this trend continues or changes over the next several years as we all know the current portal and G League setups drastically changed college basketball recruiting and parity from what we have seen this year.
 
The count is easy for the SEC. Kentucky 8, Florida 2 and Arkansas 1.

The ACC is not a stable conference. Schools come and go. I am not smart enough to keep up with the full count. They don't even have Notre Dame football but they have basketball. Explain that?


The hell you talking about schools come and go? The only school that left is Maryland and that's been a few years ago. I guess you forgot Texas and OK are joining, before that Texas A&M. @lurkeraspect84 come get your uncle.
 
You realize the SEC has recently added teams from other conferences, right? Also, they're going to be adding Texas and Oklahoma in the next few years. But, yeah, please talk about the stability of the conference. The ACC shits on the SEC when it comes to basketball. Even in one of our "down years", we get 3 times as many teams in the Sweet 16 as the SEC. It might "mean more" in the SEC but the ACC actually does more.
Dr. do you take me for a fool?

The ACC is 2 decades younger than the SEC. The ACC adds and subtracts teams all the time. Hell, half the time I don’t know which school is ACC or not. In football the ACC adds Notre Dame in basketball but Notre Dame is not about to share football revenue with the ACC, so they duck on the football side and the wimpy ACC still goes along with adding Notre Dame to the basketball conference. Talking about big pussies.

The SEC started with 13 teams in 1932: Alabama, Auburn (then Alabama Polytechnic Institute), Florida, Georgia, Georgia Tech, Kentucky, Louisiana State, Mississippi, Mississippi State (then Mississippi A&M), Sewanee, Tennessee, Tulane and Vanderbilt. We don’t add teams for basketball without the football like the ACC does.

The ACC was not formed until 1953. If you are not too good in math that means the SEC was already 21 years old and had a few national championships before the ACC was created.

All the teams listed above are still in the SEC except for Georgia Tech, Sewanee and Tulane which leaves 10.

The SEC added South Carolina and Arkansas in 1991 then Missouri and Texas A&M in 2012.

Sometime in the near future Oklahoma and Texas will be added if the other conferences don’t come up with a scheme to fvck it up either legally, financially or through the NCAA.

Personally, I could care less if Oklahoma and Texas are added as I don’t see the big benefits to the SEC. But it is a big deal in making the SEC the predominate football conference (which they already are) and we all know where the money comes from.

The ACC has little football money compared to the SEC and B1G and that is what keeps their fan’s britches on fire most of the time because ACC football is a minor sport. They have to invent stories about their poweress in basketball.
 
Dr. do you take me for a fool?

The ACC is 2 decades younger than the SEC. The ACC adds and subtracts teams all the time. Hell, half the time I don’t know which school is ACC or not. In football the ACC adds Notre Dame in basketball but Notre Dame is not about to share football revenue with the ACC, so they duck on the football side and the wimpy ACC still goes along with adding Notre Dame to the basketball conference. Talking about big pussies.

The SEC started with 13 teams in 1932: Alabama, Auburn (then Alabama Polytechnic Institute), Florida, Georgia, Georgia Tech, Kentucky, Louisiana State, Mississippi, Mississippi State (then Mississippi A&M), Sewanee, Tennessee, Tulane and Vanderbilt. We don’t add teams for basketball without the football like the ACC does.

The ACC was not formed until 1953. If you are not too good in math that means the SEC was already 21 years old and had a few national championships before the ACC was created.

All the teams listed above are still in the SEC except for Georgia Tech, Sewanee and Tulane which leaves 10.

The SEC added South Carolina and Arkansas in 1991 then Missouri and Texas A&M in 2012.

Sometime in the near future Oklahoma and Texas will be added if the other conferences don’t come up with a scheme to fvck it up either legally, financially or through the NCAA.

Personally, I could care less if Oklahoma and Texas are added as I don’t see the big benefits to the SEC. But it is a big deal in making the SEC the predominate football conference (which they already are) and we all know where the money comes from.

The ACC has little football money compared to the SEC and B1G and that is what keeps their fan’s britches on fire most of the time because ACC football is a minor sport. They have to invent stories about their poweress in basketball.




You are officially stuck on stupid.
 
Bert might be rehtarded
I may agree but I could not find a definition for "REHTARDED".

Now I may be ******ed, but at the minimum I can spell.

I think you should drink less and think more or you may actually be rehtarded. o_O

My father had a good saying: Asshole are born, not made. They just get bigger.

Think about that.

By the way your post really pissed me off, so stick it.
 
I may agree but I could not find a definition for "REHTARDED".

Now I may be ******ed, but at the minimum I can spell.

I think you should drink less and think more or you may actually be rehtarded. o_O

My father had a good saying: Asshole are born, not made. They just get bigger.

Think about that.

By the way your post really pissed me off, so stick it.
Oh you dumb old fvck. The H is added to get by the censor. It was meant to piss you off. You're dumb. You've shown your ass twice, just in this thread.
 
That Illinois team that lost to UNC was just an incredible team.
And they honestly should have won that game. UNC was the more talented team (wow, that’s saying a lot!), but Illinois had Augustine foul out with 8 to go on some ticky tack bullshit, leaving its bench to guard Shaun May the rest of the game, and they missed about 7 threes in the last 1:30 that would have taken the lead or tie it (very uncharacteristic for that team).

Props to UNC, though, they were honestly one of the best teams of all time. That was an amazing championship game that had honestly been hyped since December.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mannjay
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT