You have a strong preference for alternative facts. Nothing like making fan fiction out of a scorecard, I see.
Actually, no, I wrote the joke myself. It's ironic, see, b/c I said that in a post where I was saying I was "sorta good" with words.
I'm sure you're whipping up a poll on a board loaded w/ conservatives to get you all good and fluffed.
It was pretty low on the degree-of-difficulty scale, but you still managed to underperform.
More the twitch-smile-on-one-side funny than bust-a-gut funny, but okay, sure. I'm bored with your trolling for the time being.
How do you keep children safe? That is what I am asking. You said it. No need to skirt the question. I guess focusing on a single, very key, word is ridiculous. RollLaugh
@TheDude1 would be drunk after one wine cooler
How do schools keep children safe? I don't really know where to begin... education? curriculum? advocacy? medical attention? child protective services? head counts? supervising? I have a hard time believing you're serious.
Making sure nobody physically hurts them. How do you do that?
I’d put my quitting on hold for one nightFIFY. And don’t be a wise guy... you know you’d go back to smoking if we hung out
. They are still going on about pigtails? I’m sorry, I can’t tell if it is lame or stalkerish, or some strange mix of both. But hey, if they get a kick out of it, great, glad to be of service
Catholic schools....yikes, guess that was more of a gamble than they thought.
Your turn to answer a few questions: Is it okay to leave early elementary school kids home unsupervised? Not whether it's legal or not, but is it acceptable in the court of public opinion? Why or why not?
Who said anything about leaving them home unsupervised?
I grew up in a different era. They didn't have to worry about me playing outside by myself or getting shot up at school.
A few things.
First, yeah, I think most people would get along. Not everyone; I genuinely think there are a few assholes on here I’d have no time for. What can you do... in life, there are assholes.
Second, I’m not sure I take super far left stances
Third, go ahead and laugh; I have no idea what they’ve been doing
.[/QUOTE
Eh, I think posts sound more harsh than they actually are. They read very pointed and angry and are a summary of a larger explanation. I’m sure your not some crazy leftist, but all we talk about are social issues. We would bore ourselves if we just talked about taxes and economics.
It’s all in good humor about the pedo jokes—mainly bc it isn’t about me lol.
Don't dodge my question! How do you keep kids safe, from physical harm, at school? Laughing
Nah. It makes me happy to see people eat their own words. Not angry.
So, you use nunchucks or what?
Wanna talk about left field. You call me out in a thread where it had been an hour and 30 posts since I commented on. You said I was being a dick to datt and then a few posts later you tell someone else that datt could speak for himself. That's funny to me. Good night.
Yep. I trust I could share a few beers with you, toonces, and have it play out exactly like you said. There are some people here I'd refuse to shake hands with.
I think mine become more extreme in response to opposite extremes. Like playing along and humoring someone's counter-example they brought up just to deflect. I won't do it.Second, I’m not sure I take super far left stances
It's lame and stalkerish, but it's worse than that and more serious than that. They're creating a new truth. It doesn't amount to much here, really, but it's the kind of tactic our President uses to undermine faith in our elections, the press, our military & FBI, and more.They are still going on about pigtails? I’m sorry, I can’t tell if it is lame or stalkerish, or some strange mix of both
.
I bet you can find a post where he said he was hungry and another one where he said he wasn't. You should put those side-by-side without any context and pretend he's so kooky and contradictory and then use that laughing emoji again.