Somebody thought of the idea for that video, acted it out, edited it, and posted it. And at no point did they realize it was a steaming pile of poopy?
Is drawing negative attention to something better that not bringing attention to it at all?
What's funny is the wife and I refer to our vaccine card as our nazi numbers.
I have never been an anti vaccer. Though I don't see a single use for this vaccine regarding my health, I needed it for our vacation.You got the vaccine and didn’t die?
Go figure.
I have never been an anti vaccer. Though I don't see a single use for this vaccine regarding my health, I needed it for our vacation.
Yeah, ummmm, we gonna see this kid on the news one day...Yep. It's from The Onion.
I edited out the other video, as I wasn't trying to highlight that. But, here it is, in case others were wondering what you were referencing.
How often did MLK kneel to the flag? Seems he reached a many of eyeballs....And in a time with nowhere near the media, technology we have today..What is an alternative that will reach as many eyeballs?
I’ve just been hearing how it kills everybody on contact and satan is behind it. Refreshing to see somebody make it out alive.
I literally cannot take you seriously if you’re comparing crybaby athletes to the revolutionists.Yes. MLK Jr. brought a lot of negative attention. I’m pretty sure the only attention the American Revolutionists received from England was negative.
I just left that stupid ass comparison alone.I literally cannot take you seriously if you’re comparing crybaby athletes to the revolutionists.
Interested in Brooks response to this.....When members of a protest aren't peaceful, then the protest isnt peaceful. Protests can't infringe on others constitutional rights. Protests can't be effective when their rallying cry is based on a false narrative. Protests can be effective....with the right message being sent to the right audience. What purpose does blocking emergency services hold? What purpose does it serve to keep people from getting to their jobs in time to support their family? What purpose does it serve to burn down buildings and steal from people? The protests were a complete mess. Any good and positive message was drowned out by idiot after idiot. (from the top down). It might be one of the most poorly organized and led protests/movement in history.
You should probably listen to better sources.I’ve just been hearing how it kills everybody on contact and satan is behind it. Refreshing to see somebody make it out alive.
Fvcking idiot.I am listening to two women
Interested in Brooks response to this.....
There is a difference in disruption vs violence, vandalism, looting, etc,etc...Rosa parks caused a disruption when she refused to move. She didn't bust out windows, catch the bus on fire. She simply refused to move. That simple non-violent, non-disrespectful act, created more opportunity, then anyhitng BLM has ever done.Protest doesn’t exist without disruption.
There is a difference in disruption vs violence, vandalism, looting, etc,etc...Rosa parks caused a disruption when she refused to move. She didn't bust out windows, catch the bus on fire. She simply refused to move. That simple non-violent, non-disrespectful act, created more opportunity, then anyhitng BLM has ever done.
Back on the day when the civil rights activists were protesting, the peaceful protesters would leave whenever the protests turned violent. That's because they knew it hurt their overall message. And because they knew that it was no longer a peaceful protest. Nowadays, it is a peaceful protest as long as only 7% are violent.Protest doesn’t exist without disruption.
Back on the day when the civil rights activists were protesting, the peaceful protesters would leave whenever the protests turned violent. That's because they knew it hurt their overall message. And because they knew that it was no longer a peaceful protest. Nowadays, it is a peaceful protest as long as only 7% are violent.
That's not a relevant question. The people who had a legitimate cause for protest had enough common sense to know that all it took was for one violent protester to ruin the message that was intended to be delivered. So they left. Now, they have a false narrative that they are protesting and they are doing so in a much worse way. All at the fault of white liberals. But their answer to the (small percentage) of violent protesters is that they only make up a small percentage of the overall protesters. This way they can be factual at the same time as being dismissive of the effects of the violent and deadly peaceful protests from the past year. But hey, the FBI is investigating a lego likeness of the capitol building in order to get to the bottom of January 6th. Got to get those evil white supremacists that are terrorizing America.How many were violent during the protests?
I would guess a higher percentage were violent and destructive than the percentage of white supremacists being the biggest threat to our democracy. Geezis.How many were violent during the protests?
Protests aren’t effective without an effective message. They also aren’t effective when they are led by ducking idiotsProtest doesn’t exist without disruption.
Could you be a tad more specific here, Brooky....The protests weren’t violent
A buddy of mine smoked cigarettes for an entire month and is still alive. I was so glad to find out that cigarettes aren’t hazardous to your health.I’ve just been hearing how it kills everybody on contact and satan is behind it. Refreshing to see somebody make it out alive.