Unless he can outrun me, it would be easy. He definitely will not shoot you haha
Place to put my Nonsense Thread.
- Thread starter lurkeraspect84
- Start date
You'll eventually be the tallest midget in a room. You just gotta keep looking for the right room.
I’d kick your ass.
That’s the thing, I’m not saying you can’t intervene. I’m just saying don’t kill humans for dumb shit. This place is the only place where that is controversial.
I've conceded on the fact that the GOP is equally inept as the donkeys.
Oh you’re grasping for straws now. If you grab any, hand me one; I can’t reach them.
You act like laws in regards to these things are black and white. In fact, they are not.
You gotta let him have some brass knuckles or something to even it up.
You didn't capitalize Black, you racist pig
Right, which is where opinion comes in and court decisions. I don’t know of court decisions that have allowed for deadly force in response to a slap.
Oh shit I was hoping for you to be in your 50s or 60s. Being almost the same age plus you having rehtard strength, I might be in trouble.
Well the slapped victim can't testify in his own defense cause his head bounced off the curb and now he's dead.
Geezis LeBron, You need to read past page 1 of the Insulin dependent Diabetes Mellitus Manual.
He also acts like it is his opinion that determines how a case will be handled.
DA decides whether to a) not charge the person. b) charge them and set a trial date. Or c) let a grand jury decide whether or not the defendant acted in self defense.
Grand jury doesn't determine guilt, just whether there is enough reasonable doubt to go to trial.
If it goes to trial, the DA has agreed to try it as a criminal case and will have to prove without reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty of murder. I have been involved in 3 cases where self defense was the defense's argument and all 3 were found not guilty.
It goes beyond your interpretation of how laws are written. If it were as black and white as some people think it is, we wouldn't bother with trials.
The information is available on the inter webs. I know you work in medicine (I think?). I linked an article reviewed by a doctor which supported my statement. Let me know if she was mistaken.
We all know how the courts work. I don’t know why you get so worked up about people having different opinions. Do I need to preface my opinions with ”in my opinion” to make it easier on you?
Look, my little sensitive bitch. You're the one pretending to know how self defense cases work. You act like your definition of self defense is what matters and there is no need for trials.
0% chance Brooky owns a gun, so you're safe. Go get the free stuff you inherently deserve.
It’s not just MY definition
Self-Defense in Criminal Law Cases
Read about the elements of the defense of self-defense, including the reasonable fear of an imminent threat and the use of proportional force.
www.justia.com
Lol. He says that I am the one that gets so worked up. Before he edited this post to hide him getting worked up, he just said. "We all know how the courts work, dork"
For fvck's sake, get ahold of yourself.
I own a bat and these hands
I edited it to be nicer. Sorry for trying to be nice. Find a peaceful corner and take some deep breaths before you pop a blood vessel.
So you think you determine the interpretation of the law by reading how it's worded? I thought we knew how the courts work.It’s not MY definition
Self-Defense in Criminal Law Cases
Read about the elements of the defense of self-defense, including the reasonable fear of an imminent threat and the use of proportional force.
I bet he owns a massive Black (notice the capitalization) dildo that could do some damage though.
I can offer an opinion on the interpretation of the law based on how it is written, yes. That is how that works, Ghost. Furthermore, that link discusses the application of the law in the court room and what is usually upheld/decided.
I think everyone knows which one of us is more likely to be angry here. Just so you know, I have enough decency to know someone more personally than an internet message board before determining whether I don't like them based on differing political opinions. I would have a beer with you. Because I am a grownup capable of separating politics from whether or not someone is a good person. Maybe it is you that needs to take deep breaths.
Last edited:
Problem is, brook. You don't speak as if you are giving your opinion. You mock what we say and then present your interpretations as facts.
Didn't you say baseball bats are non-lethal?
First of all, don’t act like I mock you or others out of the blue. Practically everyone who posts here gives and gets plenty of attitude, or whatever we want to call it.
Second of all, I don’t qualify things with “in my opinion” because I think that phrase is a waste of letters. I don’t know what to do to present my arguments differently. All I can say is that when I decide to comment on something, I do so from an informed standpoint. Whether that means I just looked it up or knew it previously. If that comes across as something other than my interpretation of the facts (therefore, an opinion), I don’t know what to do about that.
Similar threads
