ADVERTISEMENT

****Official B1G Off Season Thread****

Old B1G threads get deleted, do we keep everything as is?


  • Total voters
    32
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
If developing players into great players doesn’t make someone a good developers of talent, what the fvck are we talking about? Idiocy.
Ayo and Kofi have performed as expected. Same with TJD. If you are a top 50 recruit, you SHOULD be one of the best players in college basketball by year 3.

He has developed about as well as Archie Miller. Congrats.
 
Ayo and Kofi have performed as expected. Same with TJD. If you are a top 50 recruit, you SHOULD be one of the best players in college basketball by year 3.

He has developed about as well as Archie Miller. Congrats.
😂

So Underwood must be an excellent coach if he can get significantly better results with the same talent. Your retahd pie cuts both ways.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1016CC0503
😂

So Underwood must be an excellent coach if he can get significantly better results with the same talent. Your retahd pie cuts both ways.
Who said they had the same talent? You stated that Underwood has a player in the league, 1 in the g league, and one as a POY candidate this year. Archie has Romeo in the league. Juwan Morgan I’m the g league (was in the nba the last two years), and TJD as a POY candidate.

Archie is a shitty coach though. Like absolutely terrible. Now Crean on the other hand was able to develop players and had better results than Underwood. Not sure you want to go down that road again though.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 1016CC0503
Who said they had the same talent? You stated that Underwood has a player in the league, 1 in the g league, and one as a POY candidate this year. Archie has Romeo in the league. Juwan Morgan I’m the g league (was in the nba the last two years), and TJD as a POY candidate.

Archie is a shitty coach though. Like absolutely terrible. Now Crean on the other hand was able to develop players and had better results than Underwood. Not sure you want to go down that road again though.
Lololol Crean had 58 total wins and 19 conference wins at this point in his rebuild, and he had no pandemic shortened seasons. Underwood’s ahead.
 
No it doesn’t. That just means I thought we were getting him. It doesnt mean I thought we had a borderline top 5 class without him.

It implies that it is basically a done deal

And it was. Regardless, Gillinois is claiming that I said IU would have a borderline top 5 class with or without Clowney. That’s false.

What? No it doesn’t.

If/when I win the lottery I will quit my job.


That doesn’t mean it’s a done deal thah I’m winning the lottery.
Just to be clear for Hail
 
Lololol Crean had 58 total wins and 19 conference wins at this point in his rebuild, and he had no pandemic shortened seasons. Underwood’s ahead.
Crean inherited a far worse situation and still got to a sweet 16 in year 4. At this point in his tenure, he had the preseason #1 team heading into year 5.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: 1016CC0503
To be fair, he said "IF" Indiana were to land CLowney, IU would have had a borderline Top 5 class. And they would have. Still, in Year one, with a coach with no CBB experience---I'll take a Top 15 class out of the gate
a quick search reveals…
You said 50-60 and IU will be very close to top 5 with Clowney. JHS is a composite 5*. Far better than any scrub Illinois has committed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: snowsquirrel11
You two are the best duo in all of college basketball, always got each other’s back.
It’s actually quite strange. Hail nitpicks to the millionth degree on literally everything, but then defends obvious BS from certain folks on here. It was the douche SNU before and now Trojan. Don’t get it.
 
Last edited:
Lololol Crean had 58 total wins and 19 conference wins at this point in his rebuild, and he had no pandemic shortened seasons. Underwood’s ahead.
Are you seriously comparing what Crean inherited, opposed to Underwood?

Like seriously?

IN Year 4, Crean won 27 games, 5th in Big 10 and went to the SW 16---as a 4 seed.

Underwood won 24 games, 2nd in Big 10, and lost in the 2nd round----as a 1-seed.

Year 5, Crean had the preseason #1 team....

Underwood does not....

Its an absolute asinine argument. Crean had ONE player return from the previous season---Kyle Taber. He averaged 1ppg the previous year. Team was full of freshman, transfers and walk-on's. Seven walk-on's to be exact..

C'mon, dude.....Its not even close.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NC_Trojan10
Are you seriously comparing what Crean inherited, opposed to Underwood?

Like seriously?

IN Year 4, Crean won 27 games, 5th in Big 10 and went to the SW 16---as a 4 seed.

Underwood won 24 games, 2nd in Big 10, and lost in the 2nd round----as a 1-seed.

Year 5, Crean had the preseason #1 team....

Underwood does not....

Its an absolute asinine argument. Crean had ONE player return from the previous season---Kyle Taber. He averaged 1ppg the previous year. Team was full of freshman, transfers and walk-on's. Seven walk-on's to be exact..

C'mon, dude.....Its not even close.
Underwood scrapped the roster and started over from scratch between year 1 and 2. Underwood’s 4th year was a much better team than Cream’s 4th, and it has every chance to be as good as his 5th. Of course we know what happened to Crean after those years.
 
Underwood scrapped the roster and started over from scratch between year 1 and 2. Underwood’s 4th year was a much better team than Cream’s 4th, and it has every chance to be as good as his 5th. Of course we know what happened to Crean after those years.
Your not worth the argument, bro...

If Underwoods 4th team was so much better, then why did his Top seeded Illini get skull ****d by a 9 seed in the 2nd round? All the while, 4th seeded Indiana won more games, advanced to the SW 16, where they probably gave one of stronger title winning teams in recent history, all they wanted..

Ye we know what happened to Crean after the 2012 year(4th season)-----He went on to two more Sw 16's, and won 2 Big 10 titles...

Agree Illinois has a chance to be as good as 2013 Indiana----but I highly doubt it. That team was realy good.
 
Your not worth the argument, bro...

If Underwoods 4th team was so much better, then why did his Top seeded Illini get skull ****d by a 9 seed in the 2nd round? All the while, 4th seeded Indiana won more games, advanced to the SW 16, where they probably gave one of stronger title winning teams in recent history, all they wanted..

Ye we know what happened to Crean after the 2012 year(4th season)-----He went on to two more Sw 16's, and won 2 Big 10 titles...

Agree Illinois has a chance to be as good as 2013 Indiana----but I highly doubt it. That team was realy good.
You finished 5th.
You lost to two sub 100 teams.
You played 5 more games. Illinois would have to win 3/5 to match.
Illinois led the nation in Quad1 wins by several games over everyone but Ok St who had 1 less.
Indiana played a KenPom 40+ ranking in the second round, but Illinois played a top 10 in that same spot. It was one more tournament win against a worse opponent. You should hang a banner for it.
Illinois’ EM on KenPom is significantly better. Indiana was measurably worse, bro.
That was a good team. This team should be good too.
 
Last edited:
Funniest sht ever. Bet on O50.5 on MNF game along witb a bunch of other bets. Obviously, it was a sht game overall (Chiefs actually sucked against a sht Gmen team), but I placed an in game O44.5 bet in the heat of the moment during 3Q. Thought I lost the bets, but…


Fat fingered the U. Hahahahaha. I’ll take it.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Jaycg15
This will go down on Lord of the Rings level for me. And that’s my favorite series of all time.
My fav movies aren’t normally the huge blockbusters. I’m more into the Good Will Hunting and Almost Famous type movies, but Dune was seriously awesome. There are other scifi movies based on great books like Ender’s Game that just didn’t work out, but Dune hit the money.
 
My fav movies aren’t normally the huge blockbusters. I’m more into the Good Will Hunting and Almost Famous type movies, but Dune was seriously awesome. There are other scifi movies based on great books like Ender’s Game that just didn’t work out, but Dune hit the money.

I’m into all sorts of movies too. We go to so many.

Dune was captivating to the level 1917 (also one of the best theater experiences) but with the characters and story of a Lord of the Rings.


It’s tragic they released it on HBO Max and so many people won’t get to experience it the way I just did.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT