Who is this “we” you speak of?Lol we just lost to Nigeria in basketball. Shut it the fvck down.
This is gonna be fun to revisit...Kid was in over his head as a frosh. Should have stayed in HS. Even then, he showed moments of the potential he has. I expect a much better version this year.Painter has GOT to get more Kristian Landers!!! Those 5 stars are just amazing!!!
I think the 4 is Houston’s best college position and I think he’ll play there more this year than most are expecting. My reasoning is that I am not a big believer in Brandon Johns in a major role and I think Kobe Bufkin is going to be too good to keep off the court. Bufkin isn’t taking those minutes from Brooks so I see him playing a lot at the 3 and pushing Houston to the 4.
Jones
Brooks
Bufkin
Houston
Dickinson
is what I see as the main lineup by end of year
That lineup isn't happening for long stretches. Way too small among the 1-3 positions.
Houstan may be more apt at the four, but he will play the three out of necessity. Nobody else is good enough to play that spot.
I'm not sold on Johns either. He will be fine for 20 min at the four with TWill getting 10 there along Diabate getting 20 total (split among the 4/5).
Who?Too bad that one Purdue **** who has blocked me on Twitter ain’t here anymore with macyregor getting his teeth kicked in
Who was wishing? May want to brush up on your reading comprehension skills gramps.Wishing injuries on other teams players is weird man.
Just drop the subject.
Don't know if it is likely, but do believe it is possible!In your dreams. 🤣
not likely. Private citizens tax returns are just that i.e. private. School has no obligation to keep track of how much a player gets and/or the source.Should be
Lander was supposed to be a stud 5 star. Dude’s a middle school playerLol *ignores all the other stud 5*s to point out one who will likely be a stud 5* in the future*
And a lot of those guys didn’t win shit in college. So who gives a flying fvck if a guy that never played basketball gave them some starsLol *ignores all the other stud 5*s to point out one who will likely be a stud 5* in the future*
Lander has 4 years of eligibility left and you are already writing him off lol.Lander was supposed to be a stud 5 star. Dude’s a middle school player
Somehow still shot better from 3 than Ivey.Lander was supposed to be a stud 5 star. Dude’s a middle school player
And yet Ivey is 100x the player. That tells you how bad Lander isSomehow still shot better from 3 than Ivey.
There is a gap but they're also completely different players. Will be interesting to see how lander develops.And yet Ivey is 100x the player. That tells you how bad Lander is
I meant should be as in I hope it isnot likely. Private citizens tax returns are just that i.e. private. School has no obligation to keep track of how much a player gets and/or the source.
And a lot of those guys didn’t win shit in college. So who gives a flying fvck if a guy that never played basketball gave them some stars
Im assuming his point was if they don’t win games, the 5-stars they got in HS don’t mean shit.I’m pretty happy to land 5 stars. It’s always odd to me when people who pay for a Rivals membership go the route of “who cares about what people who have never played basketball rank recruits”. It’s like paying for PornHub Premium and asking who cares about tits.
Your team wins games, which is the point. IU has been a dumpster fire even with five star kids, and Lander clearly should never have been rated that high.I’m pretty happy to land 5 stars. It’s always odd to me when people who pay for a Rivals membership go the route of “who cares about what people who have never played basketball rank recruits”. It’s like paying for PornHub Premium and asking who cares about tits.
Shoutout to the chicubs guy who is still chugging along and had one of the funnier posts on here I’ve seen in a while (the Jesse from breaking bad gif).The IU guys are in such a good place that they have either left the board entirely or started writing fan fic about Purdue being destroyed by NIL and potential injuries.
Lander didn’t look like a top 150 kid last year, let alone a 5 star.Your team wins games, which is the point. IU has been a dumpster fire even with five star kids, and Lander clearly should never have been rated that high.
We all know Crean was an awful coach, yet he had similar success to Matt Painter while at IU. It’s because he had superior talent to make up for his lack of coaching ability.Your teams wins games, which is the point. IU has been a dumpster fire even with five star kids, and Lander clearly should never have been rated that high.
Keep up being a dumpster fire. Can’t wait until the season and you guys suck again.We all know Crean was an awful coach, yet he had similar success to Matt Painter while at IU. It’s because he had superior talent to make up for his lack of coaching ability.
Maybe if you landed better talent you wouldn’t be in a 41 year Final 4 drought. Clearly what you guys have been doing under Keady and Painter has been working. Keep up the good work.
Keep up being nationally irrelevant.Keep up being a dumpster fire. Can’t wait until the season and you guys suck again.
LOL IU isnt even state relevantKeep up being nationally irrelevant.
Im assuming his point was if they don’t win games, the 5-stars they got in HS don’t mean shit.
Your team wins games, which is the point. IU has been a dumpster fire even with five star kids, and Lander clearly should never have been rated that high.
Lol yea we are the biggest brand, most popular, and flagship basketball program in the state.LOL IU isnt even state relevant
He said who gives a sht about the Iu guys that have been part of the dumpster fire. Not sure what you’re getting at.Some players are overrated and some coaches can’t maximize talent, but warping that into “So who gives a flying fvck if a guy that never played basketball gave them some star” is pretty silly. I’d imagine most of us give at least some amount of fvcks considering we are here and paying for the content.
On the court, you are irrelevant at every levelLol yea we are the biggest brand, most popular, and flagship basketball program in the state.
Even with how bad we have been the last few years, we are still more popular than you.
And yet we are still the bigger brand and more popular. No one cares about Purdue.On the court, you are irrelevant at every level
Dumpster fire on the courtAnd yet we are still the bigger brand and more popular. No one cares about Purdue.
The last sentence was weird forsure, because you don’t have to play a sport to understand it or vice versa.Some players are overrated and some coaches can’t maximize talent, but warping that into “So who gives a flying fvck if a guy that never played basketball gave them some star” is pretty silly. I’d imagine most of us give at least some amount of fvcks considering we are here and paying for the content.
Gonna be tough to recover from this knockout blow.Lol yea we are the biggest brand, most popular, and flagship basketball program in the state.
Even with how bad we have been the last few years, we are still more popular than you.
Why? Because he was should be senior in HS, playing in the B10? Thats just a dumb analysis. Never mind the fact as the season wore on, Lander improved. His last two games, he totaled 15 points, 5 assists, with only 1 turnover---in 38 total minutes. You could see as the season went, he got more comfortable with game, i.e. the speed, tempo, etc, etc.. I think Millers management of him was more of a deterrent to his development,opposed to his ability. Miller buried the kid. I get that,to an extent. But then again, why do encouraged a kid to recalssify, then bury his ass on the bench? Even after his two, back to back solid games vs Michigan/MSU, Miller only played him 7 minutes vs Purdue, and not at all vs Rutgers. Head scratching for sure. SOmething his dad spoke openly about.Your team wins games, which is the point. IU has been a dumpster fire even with five star kids, and Lander clearly should never have been rated that high.