So coworker told him this has to be next after Breaking Bad. Really looking forward to it
*Official* B1G Off-season Thread
- Thread starter jwardelt
- Start date
So coworker told him this has to be next after Breaking Bad. Really looking forward to it
Without giving away spoilers, I think it’s pretty safe to say there will be a lot more fantasy in the final 7 episodes.
I've got the book. Have started it but need some time to finish it. Maybe this winter when I've got less going on.
What did you do Cardinal, post a link on your homeboard for the likes? That shit is weak.
That was me. I thought the homeboard people would like to see the comparison. I was right.
Side note Maryland has a new AD. Not their first choice, but I think they got it right out of the 3 finalists.
Side note Maryland has a new AD. Not their first choice, but I think they got it right out of the 3 finalists.
I heard he loves Mark Turgeon. Sucks for you.
So we get to ask for your banning and when a plethora of Purdue homers rush over here during the season next year? Like we didn't have enough make an appearance during your great regular season run.
Nah, most of them are too busy waiting for our next football commit to bookmark this page.
Let’s take a look at things once you frame the data a bit differently, shall we? This time stretching back only a few more years than Cardinal suggested.
IU data last 30 Years:
Wins - 620
Losses - 358
Winning % - 63.4%
Avg. Wins - 20.7
Avg. Losses - 11.9
B10 Champs - 5
Avg. B10 Finish - 4.6
Final Fours - 2
Sweet Sixteens - 6
25 Win Seasons - 9
Tourney Appearances - 22
Purdue data last 30 years:
Wins - 610
Losses - 366
Winning % - 62.5%
Avg. Wins - 20.3
Avg. Losses - 12.2
B10 Champs - 5
Avg. B10 Finish - 4.5
Final Fours - 0
Sweet Sixteens - 6
25 Win Seasons - 10
Tourney Appearances - 21
A little more objective way to view the data.
IU data last 30 Years:
Wins - 620
Losses - 358
Winning % - 63.4%
Avg. Wins - 20.7
Avg. Losses - 11.9
B10 Champs - 5
Avg. B10 Finish - 4.6
Final Fours - 2
Sweet Sixteens - 6
25 Win Seasons - 9
Tourney Appearances - 22
Purdue data last 30 years:
Wins - 610
Losses - 366
Winning % - 62.5%
Avg. Wins - 20.3
Avg. Losses - 12.2
B10 Champs - 5
Avg. B10 Finish - 4.5
Final Fours - 0
Sweet Sixteens - 6
25 Win Seasons - 10
Tourney Appearances - 21
A little more objective way to view the data.
He was comparing from when Painter has been Purdue’s coach and gave IU 25 years lmao. That’s not skewing the data in Purdue’s favor.
Funny thing is Purdue fans talk shit about this stretch of IU basketball and how they are no longer relevant. What does that say about them?
Exactly. This has been our worst stretch in program history. The data looks pretty equal of course except for those two Final Four appearances that IU has. LOL!
It’s not you’re right, he gave IU the benefit of the doubt by giving you guys another decade. It’s understandable that you’re butt-hurt about it though so no worries.
Interesting that Crean lost 18.4% of those 358 losses in just his first 3 years.
Yeah, maybe we should look at the data excluding Crean's years. I mean, Cardinal just randomly picked 26 wins and 25 years. Why not just pick and choose what we want to do to make the data look awesome for us.
Taking out Crean's first three years our winning percentage goes up to 67%.
Yeah, well, the Purdue data above also includes the 18 games vacated because Purdue broke rules as well. Whooooooops.
They hired a known cheater but it wasn't to try and make IU relevant. IU was four years removed from a final four.
I am still bitter that the cheating was legal a couple years after the fact. Regardless of that fact Kelvin was a scumbag in many other ways and not a good fit.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_vacated_and_forfeited_games_in_college_basketball is Indiana University on this list?
Yeah I know I’m just using hyperbole to get SNU more rustled to be honest. I’m still a little bitter one of those calls went to Hummel haha. But agree with what you said.
So, would you say that for the vast majority of the modern era, the programs have been on equal footing? I don't think Purdue fans really argued that Purdue is way ahead of Indiana, but I do know that argument is made the other way.
It's interesting to think, what if IU goes 0-3 in Elite 8 games instead of 2-1, and if Purdue goes 2-0 instead of 0-2 in their Elite 8 games during that stretch? Does it really change the overall success of the two programs in the past three decades?
The series in the past 30 years is Purdue - 29, Indiana - 30 if my math is correct.
(*Side note: you're missing two Sweet 16 appearances for Purdue, but I appreciate the research on this.)
Let's see if we can get this thread back on track:
I used Wiki and did it quickly. Figured it was close enough to compare but likely had some minor errors. Lol.
Illinois adds another player taller than 6'6" to the roster. Almost enough for a frontcourt now.
Similar threads
