ADVERTISEMENT

*Official* B1G In-Season Thread

Do we have any Brownies fan ITT?
They just traded for OBJ.
SB or bust, I guess.
I follow them simply due to my brother being a HUGE Browns fan. This is a HUGE statement. Hell they were damn near a playoff team this past year. This could make them favorites in their division? Maybe Top 4 in the AFC?
 
Do we have any Brownies fan ITT?
They just traded for OBJ.
SB or bust, I guess.
Giants seem to have gotten better end of the deal. 1st rd (#17), 3rd rd, and Jabril Peppers. Dump the high salary and start a rebuild.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KisteK
I follow them simply due to my brother being a HUGE Browns fan. This is a HUGE statement. Hell they were damn near a playoff team this past year. This could make them favorites in their division? Maybe Top 4 in the AFC?
On paper, Baker has these weapons:
Chubb, Kareem Hunt, Jarvis Landry, and OBJ.
I don't follow them and have no idea how their OL and defense look like. But man, offensively this oughta be a fun team to watch.
 
Thanks for looking out for me buddy
tenor.gif
 
Beilein's player development has meant quite a bit of early NBA entrants. If those players stayed around for as long as most of Purdue's players, this isn't even a discussion. It's not really a discussion outside of Purdue slappies as it is. Izzo/Beilein are the tier 1 coaches in the conference. Painter can be on tier 2 by himself, sure.
You seem obsessed with teirs You were triggered when I said Purdue was on a tier above UM this year. It’s just an opinion. I’m obsessed with Purdue finding the magical tourney draw where they play absolutely no one to get to a natty. Then Matt can reside in magical teir one never to be questioned even though he never once actually won a national championship.
 
You seem obsessed with teirs You were triggered when I said Purdue was on a tier above UM this year. It’s just an opinion. I’m obsessed with Purdue finding the magical tourney draw where they play absolutely no one to get to a natty. Then Matt can reside in magical teir one never to be questioned even though he never once actually won a national championship.

Hasn’t happened in 14 years. Might be waiting a while to actually make it past the sweet 16.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SNU0821
Hasn’t happened in 14 years. Might be waiting a while to actually make it past the sweet 16.
I admitted I was obsessed with an unbelievably weak tourney “gauntlet”. Then and only then can Matt move to tier one. I can’t think of any other sporting event that is so obsessed with non winning teams other than the NCAA tournament. Yes! We lost! 1st loser! Boo yah!
 
Beilein's player development has meant quite a bit of early NBA entrants. If those players stayed around for as long as most of Purdue's players, this isn't even a discussion. It's not really a discussion outside of Purdue slappies as it is. Izzo/Beilein are the tier 1 coaches in the conference. Painter can be on tier 2 by himself, sure.
All this says to me is that Beilein is getting better talent. Makes sense since it doesn't stick around.
 
All this says to me is that Beilein is getting better talent. Makes sense since it doesn't stick around.

You don’t think any of it has to do with developing that talent? Over half of Michigan’s early entrants have been ranked outside the top 75 I believe. It’s not like they are a bunch of one and dones.

Regardless, it (nba attrition) should be at least partially considered when comparing coaches.
 
I have no idea. He's got two more years to develop. You are the one making empirical statements and showing your bias.

When a Purdue poster were saying Teske isn’t an nba player it was fine but the second SNU says it about Haarms people jump on his case. What gives?
 
  • Like
Reactions: SNU0821
Nah. Wouldn't be surprised to see him think about the next level though. There is a place in an NBA rotation somewhere for a defensive big that can hit 3's at an okay clip. That being said I'm positive he returns.

Nah no way he thinks about the next level IMO. Really doubt he’d make a team, not a knock on him but just the nba game now.

I have no idea. He's got two more years to develop. You are the one making empirical statements and showing your bias.



@otte21 stop making empirical statements and showing your bias.
 
Haarms is just a SO and I NEVER read or heard anyone call him a 1 n done player. he is a 4 year development player. so some need to stop being fools and say he is not a NBA Player.

lets wait till after his SR season is done before making those type of comments,

his 7'2 height will get NBA peoples attention. like they say you CAN'T TEACH HEIGHT.
 
The difference in attempts is staggering.

Carsen Edwards - 30% on 199 3pt attempts

Romeo Langford - 32% on 81 3 point attempts

One of the two is a major league chucker and it isn't Romeo Langford
Carsen took almost as many three's(199) as Langford took total shots(238).:eek:
 
  • Like
Reactions: SNU0821
ADVERTISEMENT