Crazy how there’s 2 games of teams squarely on the bubble. I feel like NC State-Clemson and Ohio State-Indiana is win and in the NCAA Tournament, lose and go to the NIT
Good point. Although, I think they are more "lose and you're out" because the bubble is likely going to shrink by a few more spots; so each of the winners may still get squeezed out if they lose their next game on Friday.Crazy how there’s 2 games of teams squarely on the bubble. I feel like NC State-Clemson and Ohio State-Indiana is win and in the NCAA Tournament, lose and go to the NIT
Just shows how good of a coaching job Painter did to overcome the Chuckster and win a share of the title.
Also, if you're going to troll the FGA, at least make your hyperbole within reason. You could have said "shoots 20 times a game" and it would have been at least in the ballpark of his 19.2 field goal attempts per game.
No way Iowa wins 2 games in a row. They've been terrible recently.Finally the world's greatest basketball tournament is upon us.
Whose your pick?
I am going with Purdue. And Iowa makes it to Sat.
Go
No way Iowa wins 2 games in a row. They've been terrible recently.
Same team that's lost 5/6 of their last games and the won the two games prior to that against the bottom of the B10 on buzzer beaters. Not good, Bob.New season
https://picks.cbssports.com/college...d-by=ivxhi4tzhiytanjsgq2a====&via-medium=copy
B1G tournament challenge on CBS feel free to enter a bracket. Hopefully this doesn't get lost with all the shitposting going on today.
Password: Iowasucks
Sure man. Why not tell everyone here why we’re wrong thinking Haarms, without significant improvement, won’t get drafted or play in the NBA....LulzWhy take away from the SNU hyperbole though? It’s what he does.
Sure man. Why not tell everyone here why we’re wrong thinking Haarms, without significant improvement, won’t get drafted or play in the NBA....Lulz
Same team that's lost 5/6 of their last games and the won the two games prior to that against the bottom of the B10 on buzzer beaters. Not good, Bob.
I'm a motherfvcking monsoon, and I'm headed for Iowa.Hey dick face, don't rain on my parade, lol. It's tourney time and I am trying to be optimistic
I'm a motherfvcking monsoon, and I'm headed for Iowa.
Hoping for that Iowa-Illinois rematch. At least we can settle this once and for now.
You argued with me all day because I said it’s highly unlikely, which it is. He would have to significantly improve meaning a lot more than he has already.Again, I said if he continues to improve over the next two years like he has so far, it wouldn’t surprise me if he gets drafted. Never guaranteed it. Just that there’d be a chance.
Finally the world's greatest basketball tournament is upon us.
Whose your pick?
I am going with Purdue. And Iowa makes it to Sat.
Go
Sure man. Why not tell everyone here why we’re wrong thinking Haarms, without significant improvement, won’t get drafted or play in the NBA....Lulz
Crazy how there’s 2 games of teams squarely on the bubble. I feel like NC State-Clemson and Ohio State-Indiana is win and in the NCAA Tournament, lose and go to the NIT
Great point. St Mary’s stole a bid last nightGood point. Although, I think they are more "lose and you're out" because the bubble is likely going to shrink by a few more spots; so each of the winners may still get squeezed out if they lose their next game on Friday.
Great point. St Mary’s stole a bid last night
It’s actually even lower since we have been talking about conference games only, where he took 81 three’s.He made 33 three's. If he shot 38%, he would have made 46. 13 more three's, or 39 more points on the season. That's an extra 1.25 points per game. That would get him to 18 pts per game.
But don't let numbers get in the way of your narrative.
Wow...no idea how 2 separate messages got put togetherThey’re just so different as players. I think RP will always be a better shooter than Eastern as I think that will always be a weakness for Nojel. I also think RP will probably average more assists than Eastern moving forward. If you’re looking for a true point who can shoot and assist, RP is your guy. But I think the main difference lies with defense. RP is already a good defender but Nojel is much more versatile. You can stick him on Cassius one game and then Romeo the next. He can legit guard 1-4 which is a nice luxury to have. I think he’ll always be a much better rebounder than RP too. In terms of overall scoring? I could see it going either way. Wouldn’t surprise me if either outscored the other. For Purdue, they rarely have guys that average a ton of assists because of the motion offense. Eastern is a unique player with his size but I’m happy with him just like IU fans are happy with RP.
It’s actually even lower since we have been talking about conference games only, where he took 81 three’s.
81 x (38% - 32%) = 4.86
4.86 x 3 = 14.58
14.58 / 20 = 0.729 incremental pts
16.4, so the extra 6% would get him to 17.1And what's his conference average?
You guys are now arguing semantics.You argued with me all day because I said it’s highly unlikely, which it is. He would have to significantly improve meaning a lot more than he has already.
Yeah man. I don't get it. I said it's highly unlikely, but possible. Some Purdue fans took issue with it. Really weird.You guys are now arguing semantics.
1) “a chance” if he keeps improving at the same rate
vs.
2) “highly unlikely” if he doesn’t improve significantly.
Yeah man. I don't get it. I said it's highly unlikely, but possible. Some Purdue fans took issue with it. Really weird.
Haarms has zero chance at the NBA as well. Europe is a possibility for both.
What's your point? I said it's highly unlikely. Another way of saying that, wait for it, is Haarms has zero chance at the NBA. He pretty much is what he is at this point. Go unbunch your panties.
It’s the language that deal in absolutes with no qualifiers that always start these arguments. I can see both sides of the argument. Haarms obviously isn’t good enough right now from a skill (except blocks) and physical perspective (except mobility), so he will have to continue to make improvement jumps or he has no chance.Yeah man. I don't get it. I said it's highly unlikely, but possible. Some Purdue fans took issue with it. Really weird.
He would need to put on serious weight/strength along with becoming a serious threat from deep which he hasn't shown yet. And I don't mean hit the occasional 3pt shot every handful of games. He needs to show he can hit multiple a game at a high rate. Add in he's not on any mock draft boards, his age, year in school and the unlikelihood he leaves early, his age is going to be a negative factor as well. I put all those things together and came to the conclusion that it's highly unlikely he gets drafted and/or plays in the NBA. He'll improve, sure, but not enough to get drafted. I would put the likelihood at close to zero he gets drafted.It’s the language that deal in absolutes with no qualifiers that always start these arguments. I can see both sides of the argument. Haarms obviously isn’t good enough right now from a skill (except blocks) and physical perspective (except mobility), so he will have to continue to make improvement jumps or he has no chance.
With that being said, he has made substantial jumps compared to where he was when he walked in the door 3 years ago as the #350+ rated recruit in his class. He is only a soph and has 2 more years to develop. Plus the NBA is a totally different game now where teams are looking for mobility and rim protection. Haas would have been a lottery pick 15 yrs ago, but the game has changed so much since then. Haarms is more of the protypical big man that teams look for now, although he needs to keep adding strength. If he can develop a long range jumper (form looks good and he has made some albeit on low attempts), he has a chance IMO.
i said he'd average 23-25 ppg IIRC, which, omg, he did!I think I used that fact when a Purdue fan/fans thought Edwards could score 25ppg in conference play.
In Snu's world, Highly unlikely = zero.What's your point? I said it's highly unlikely. Another way of saying that, wait for it, is Haarms has zero chance at the NBA. He pretty much is what he is at this point. Go unbunch your panties.
i said he'd average 23-25 ppg IIRC, which, omg, he did!