Meh...Jordan's desire to win was unrivaled. One of the biggest difference's to me, is Michael demanded the best from his teammates. LeBron demanded better teammates, i.e. super teams, etc, etc..Nothing wrong with either. Just to me, one speaks louder than the other. LeBron made the decision to jump around. SHopping for rings IMO. Jordan held the course s Chicago built mostly through the draft. I understand MJ had a better supporting cast, for the most part...But lets not forget, LeBron had Bosh and Wade, at Miami. That's as good of a trio than Mike had while in Chitown. Not to mention that MJ won titles in an era where centers were centers, and played huge roles. Jordan had Bill Cartwright and Will Perdue. I know, I know...Scottie Pippen/Dennis Rodman. But Wade and Bosh....I mean, that's a solid 1/2 counter. I'm not so sure you can argue MJ doesn't win the titles he won, with the talent LeBron had. I mean you substitute MJ for LeBron, in Miami---with Bosh and Wade? Goodness. Put him on a team Irving, Love and Thompson? Yeah---he's winning.
Speaking of NBA finals track record. MJ went to 6. WON 6. Never went past a Game 6. Had he not retired, its conceivable the Bulls could have won 7, 8 or 9 straight. James has gotten there frequently. And that's impressive. He's also lost frequently...That is not.
IMO, biggest difference was MJ's desire to win. To push guys. Demanded it. To me, that's what sets MJ apart. Dude was just an assassin.
