Yea because we all know who gets tore up over the truth about their program fake fraud boy!!!Laughing
Juzang to UK
- Thread starter Rupp'sRunt
- Start date
Yea because we all know who gets tore up over the truth about their program fake fraud boy!!!Laughing
Exactly lol...win at all cost baby just don’t get caught!!!SmokinSmile #CarolinaWay
Great... I can live with that. I don’t care how you or anybody else views UNC. It doesn’t affect me one bit.
Glad you feel that way. That makes it easier for you to live with the fact that UNC cheated for 20 years.
That’s what you think he's doing? Who did he push out the door?
This should be good.
They were supposed to be first round picks, but when 5* guys stay at UNC for 4 years, their stock drops through the floor.
Because Roy kept 4 and 5 star player's for 4 years, Cal only keeps his kids for a year, 2 sometimes.
Kudos to Roy, I wish Cal could keep players for multiple years, but when 4* guys are getting first round/lottery deals after 1 year, it's hard to build momentum from year to year when you have to start out from scratch every year, titles become harder to win.
Yet you lambasted Duke for not winning this year.
And before you say "Zion, blah blah blah"...he's one player. Cal has had several teams as talented overall as this Duke team.
Face it, youth just isn't a great excuse when you're dealing with 8-10 of the most talented players in the country. They're not all freshmen, and by the end of the year most of those freshmen are usually well-adjusted to the college game.
3...2....1 Cal backed off
Laughing Still think he ends up at Kentucky, but this just shows his "source" is nothing. ED is the most connected with just about every kid.
I don’t think mcdaniels is a guy that’s going to dominate as a freshman. I’m not hating on him, I think he can still help a team. He does some things that will be tough for other teams. But there’s not enough of him to play under the basket and he’s a bit slow to play on the perimeter.
I think he’d do well as like the 4th option for a team. Finishing plays, just being active.
I think he’d do well as like the 4th option for a team. Finishing plays, just being active.
I knew his source was nothing when he said JJ was committing tomorrow (Wednesday) & it went almost 4 weeks.
I knew Cole Anthony was UNC bound, just didn’t know when. Some recruits are pretty obvious to predict.
Yeah I mean it didn't take some genius to figure out he was Uk bound whenever he announced reclass.......anyone with a twitter account knew even before he reclassed that UK was gonna get him
I'd bet on classic misdirection before an announcement, but will say hes made his recruitment interesting. ED may just be a UL fan trolling like you though.
RollLaughRollLaughRollLaughRollLaughRollLaughRollLaughRollLaughRollLaughRollLaughRollLaughRollLaughRollLaugh
So now the recruiting experts are out to get Kentucky by trolling them....yeah......that sounds......legit
I'd bet on you not having any "sources" being as you are 0/2. Juzang was WAY off. And now the most connected recruiting guy switches to foggy and we all know no one has the info he does. Obviously he's heard something and I guess your "source" hasn't. Laughing
Again, he may go to Uk, but everyone follows E.D. in basically every recruitment. After he makes his pick, several several others follow every time. If he's up in the air, then it's up in the air, which means your "source" was once again, wrong.
Last edited:
LOL @ you for not telling he was joking
Of the 2 sentences in my post you went for the sarcasm. Nice
The only person trolling is your "source" towards you.
Non-stop repetition. Apparently you don't think he's coming to Uk either being as I saw about 30 "He goeth" posts from you. Laughing
according to Bossi........ things might of changed tonight with McDaniels that would of made RR right with his info. Dont want to say anything more so I dont give away HOB info from Bossi.
That's what I heard as well, and thought all along until ED jumped the gun, which took everyone by surprise.
Reality says otherwise. Consider the development curve, where we see players becoming more productive (i.e. helping to win games) from year to year with almost boring regularity. In fact, youth is actually a terrific excuse for losing games, and it's the best argument against the strategy that Cal popularized (and K has taken up) for the same reasons. You have it exactly backwards (i.e. contrary to actual evidence) by arguing that young but "talented" teams should win more.
When you use the word "talent" here, you're clearly referring to athletic potential (which is what draft and HS rankings are based on), which is not synonymous with expected production, which is what you're attempting to argue here (tHeRe ArE nO fReShMaN iN mArCh!). Just compare senior Frank Mason (consensus POTY) and freshman De'Aaron Fox (first team All-SEC), then look at their draft slot and pro prospects: Fox was and is more "talented," while Mason was better for winning college basketball games in 2017.
Yeah, youth is an excuse for run-of-the-mill freshmen. Not for players that would be getting solid NBA minutes if they weren’t forced to spend a year in college. Not sure what is difficult to understand about this concept.
Wall and Cousins were not Ochai Agbaji.
Virtually every year Kentucky fans go into the tourney with expectations as high as any fanbase. The youth excuse only starts pouring out when they lose.
If building a team this way is a poor strategy, does that make Cal a moron? Why not mix in more multi-year players? There have been very few surprise OADs at Kentucky. Most have followed the predictable track. It would be very easy for him to do this. Yet, for all the excuses, very few Kentucky fans actually want this. You want to bombard opposing teams with raw talent (and some key vets—let’s not pretend like Cal never has a sophomore Washington or a Reid Travis).
I’m not sure how “players get better with experience” shoots down my argument. The point is that many of these freshmen are already among the best players in the country. Kentucky has had more superstar, NBA-ready freshmen than anyone else under Calipari. Only Duke has even been close. And the vast majority of these OADs were very productive college players. There haven’t been many Ortons or Skals. And the occasional disappointment isn’t devastating when there are 8 more high-level players on the roster.
BTW, 90% (if not more) of Kentucky fans would have chosen freshman Fox over senior Mason going into the tourney.
Why hide behind KSU? Aren't you rivals?
Anyway, KSU has nothing to do with UK and KU in the tournament, where UK leads 2-0. ('99,'12)
Because “continuing” to do something generally implies that it happens often or at least recently.
"BTW, 90% (if not more) of Kentucky fans would have chosen freshman Fox over senior Mason going into the tourney."
....so do the Sacramento Kings as Mason backs up Fox.
....so do the Sacramento Kings as Mason backs up Fox.
Similar threads
