was dirk this decade. They would def count. So 3/10? And the other 7 years you pretty mich knew who was gonna be in the finals before the season started. Esp from the east, cleveland with lebron or heat with lebron. Then there was the what 3-4 straight years of gsw in the west.
I just like parity and an even playing field. And the way it is now the big markets have a seemingly insurmountable advantage.
I think it’s less than 60% chances that all three of Durant, Kyrie, and Harden are healthy by the NBA finals (if they make it that far).
But what would it be had lebron never left cleveland and started this new super team era???Dirk was 2011. Kobe and the Lakers beat the Big 3 in Boston in 2010. So I guess that’s 4/11.
Honestly, 35% is pretty good when you consider a guy the caliber of Lebron has been at his peak in many of those years. That shows that it’s at least a solid chance. Especially with Lebron’s prime ending.
But what would it be had lebron never left cleveland and started this new super team era???
I said the current super team era. Maybe i should have rephrased to the player empowerment era.Idk, but Lebron didn’t start the super team era.
I said the current super team era. Maybe i should have rephrased to the player empowerment era.
edit: i said new super team era like its never happened before. I meant the current superteam era that started when he decided to go to miami.
Before lebron went to miami when was the last super team?? Kobe and shaq? Duncan and robinson? It just wasnt as prevelent last generation or until lebron went to miami.
Eh. We're talking about players who had been with teams for a substantial amount of time and landed in a good position vs a guy who bounces around from team to team based on who can make him look good.Like @GE Nole said, the last super team was literally 2 years before with Garnett and Ray Allen joining Paul Pierce (and a young Rondo) in Boston. The only difference was LeBron was a lot smarter and chose to live in Miami instead of Boston.
Eh. We're talking about players who had been with teams for a substantial amount of time and landed in a good position vs a guy who bounces around from team to team based on who can make him look good.
He was there 7 years. So I do need to correct myself. For some reason I thought he was gone after 4 or 5 years. Still, it wasn't a show with Garnett and Allen like it has always been with Lebron.Huh? Miami was Lebron’s second team. After he had been with the Cavs for like 9 seasons.
Boston was KG’s second team. There’s no difference at all.
He was there 7 years. So I do need to correct myself. For some reason I thought he was gone after 4 or 5 years. Still, it wasn't a show with Garnett and Allen like it has always been with Lebron.
An easy concession to make. Perhaps you're right. He may not have started it, but he has done it or attempted to do it more than anyone else.I’m not sure what you mean by “wasn’t a show.” You mean the actual decision?
But the point was guys joining up to form super teams. And yes, when KG and Allen collaborated to join Paul Pierce, it absolutely was a super team. They were known as The Big 3, and they were championship front runners from the very start.
I know some people just like to rag on Lebron, but he in no way started “the super team” trend.
Okay, thanks for extra context. But how is Lebron in Miami different than KG/PP/Ray Allen in Boston like 2 years prior?
Bc boston traded/drafted all those players. They didnt just ger together in the offseason and garnett say well i cant win in minnesota and ray you cant win in seattle?? So lets go join paul pierce on the Celtics and create a juggernaut.
The celtics front office made that happen, which is a big diff in my opinion.
Same could be said for his fanboys. Just admit that you're partial and move on. I don't like Lebron because I think he is a whiney bitch who flops, fakes or exaggerates injuries and bails on his teammates when things don't go his way. Him going from team to team is his right to do so. I don't like that in general, not because he does it.Lot of moving the goalposts when it comes to LeBron as usual. Just admit you don't like him and move on.
Same could be said for his fanboys. Just admit that you're partial and move on. I don't like Lebron because I think he is a whiney bitch who flops, fakes or exaggerates injuries and bails on his teammates when things don't go his way. Him going from team to team is his right to do so. I don't like that in general, not because he does it.
I mean, I know there is a connection between Duke and flopping. Not that flopping is exclusively a Duke thing. But that's about the only thing you can tie to Duke from what I said.How the **** do you like Duke then?
I mean, I know there is a connection between Duke and flopping. Not that flopping is exclusively a Duke thing. But that's about the only thing you can tie to Duke from what I said.
You know how I feel about the OADs. I don't consider today's Duke the Duke that I grew up watching and I sure as hell don't consider Jalen Johnson a representative of Duke. That's a terrible comparison. But anyways. We are talking about Lebron. Do you disagree with my opinion on him as a basketball player?Jalen Johnson quit on his team when things got tough. You're literally a OAD factory so that's going from one team to the next. Coach K whines to the refs ALL the time and I doubt Scheyer will be much different. There's more overlap than you think.
You know how I feel about the OADs. I don't consider today's Duke the Duke that I grew up watching and I sure as hell don't consider Jalen Johnson a representative of Duke. That's a terrible comparison. But anyways. We are talking about Lebron. Do you disagree with my opinion on him as a basketball player?
Same could be said for his fanboys. Just admit that you're partial and move on. I don't like Lebron because I think he is a whiney bitch who flops, fakes or exaggerates injuries and bails on his teammates when things don't go his way. Him going from team to team is his right to do so. I don't like that in general, not because he does it.
Fair enough. I don't necessarily think the hate he receives is comical. Particularly when strictly talking about him as a basketball player. He has incredible talent that can and should do the talking for him. He is a lot of people's G.O.A.T. and talent wise, rightfully so. I think his antics (for me) remove him from consideration. I am not the one who decides that, so it shouldn't hurt anyone's feelings that I have that opinion. I found it hilarious that he talked about carrying the team on his shoulders when AD was out and then left the court with six minutes left when that team he was carrying on his shoulders was getting whooped. He's basically the guy who unplugs the playstation whenever he is getting beat.I don't really agree with you about LeBron. He's played for 3 franchises over his 18 year career so I don't really see him as "a guy who bounces around from team to team based on who can make him look good". He's the guy who makes other players look good. He's a top 3 player of all time, does a lot of good off the court, and generally has a good demeanor on the court. He does flop and exaggerate at times so he's not perfect but the hate he receives is comical.
I actually made the concession that GE was right about him not being the first. Didn't move any goalpost. But right on. Jackass.I'm not a LeBron fan boy at all. But your first post was wrong you were told that then you started moving the goalposts like always. Stick to saying thanks dems in your little echo chamber. Leave actual basketball talk to the adults.
I actually made the concession that GE was right about him not being the first. Didn't move any goalpost. But right on. Jackass.
Eh. We're talking about players who had been with teams for a substantial amount of time and landed in a good position vs a guy who bounces around from team to team based on who can make him look good.
I stand by my overall point. The thing I didn't realize was that he was with Cleveland for 7 years. I also still belive there is a difference between what Boston did with Garnett and Allen and what Lebron has routinely done since his first exit of Cleveland. Routinely on a relative level. Don't go acting like I am saying he does it every year. There was no goalposts being moved. That was an idiotic claim. But nothing less is expected from idiots who can't argue outside of feelings. We have a different opinion. Big whoop. Good luck to whatever team you are rooting for the rest of the way.This was literally your first post dog. It was wrong and you conceded after you were told you were wrong. Super teams happened before LeBron and they'll continue to happen after. The rest of your post is just ironic as hell from a Duke supporter. They've been flopping longer than LeBron has been in he league lmao
I stand by my overall point. The thing I didn't realize was that he was with Cleveland for 7 years. I also still belive there is a difference between what Boston did with Garnett and Allen and what Lebron has routinely done since his first exit of Cleveland. Routinely on a relative level. Don't go acting like I am saying he does it every year. There was no goalposts being moved. That was an idiotic claim. But nothing less is expected from idiots who can't argue outside of feelings. We have a different opinion. Big whoop. Good luck to whatever team you are rooting for the rest of the way.
If you dont see the difference in a front office trading and drafting the players on their team, and three all stars getting together in the offseason and deciding to all sign as free agents with the same team, idk what to tell you, we will have to agree to disagree.So trading players and restructuring deals, to clear cap space, while also filling out a roster with key role players, that’s not work attributable to a front office. But trading for Kevin Garnett is?
That’s a weird distinction to make.
Regarding their talent, KG was 32 his first season in Boston. First team all NBA and DPoY. Boston won 66 games. Paul Pierce was only 31. They were plenty young and plenty good.
I imagine trading for garnett was a complex move, where as having lebron/wade/bosh sign the dotted line, not so much. So miamis front office should be rewarded for filling out their roster with roll players, some i assume who were already there? While Boston drafted pierce and traded for Garnett, their two best players? You have to gove credit for miami drafting Wade, but he was a FA at the time they all signed as well right?
Gonna have to disagree on this one, which is weird bc we usually see eye to eye on most things.
And reatructuring deals to fit all three come on now, they got those three they would have cut the medical trainer
to clear up $$$ if they had to. I imagine those were pretty easy decisions. I dont remember who all they lost when the big 3 signed but i dont recall it being very many above avg players.